I'm a pretty chilled out driver and similar to the original poster, I've struggled to understand how road rage can be so widespread, even if it provides virtually no benefit to anyone involved 95% of the time. I mean, at its core, I understand why road rage occurs - it's a sometimes illogical kneejerk reaction to actions taken by someone we immediately view as being willfully negligent and/or inconsiderate. It's a sudden and volatile outlet, but I'd be surprised if it truly helps people as much as they think it does.
If we're real, I think many of us would admit just about every type of driver probably upsets us at some point. So far in this thread, I've already seen complaints for people who drive too fast, too slow, too recklessly and too carefully. Clearly, I'm guessing the response would be, "Exactly, just drive normal and there wouldn't be any problems." To that I say, good luck. Whatever "normal" driving means, there's always going to be billions of people who don't follow its definition.
That leads me to my next thought. Do we really believe our yelling is changing anything? Is the cost benefit there? Are we willing to yell at 200 drivers in hopes that for maybe one person, it really changes their perspective on things? I understand for some of us, the answer is "yes". For me, not so much. From my experiences, road rage just sucks all around. It's upsetting if I have road rage and it's awkward and upsetting if someone I'm in the car with has road rage. My older brother is just permanently pissed off while driving and it's uncomfortable, it's embarrassing, and it sucks.
In short, I get the idea of road rage and why it happens, but more times than not, I do not find it neat, nor sensible.
Comment