More Links

JkA3 · 09-25-2009, 04:53 PM

75 just MIGHT be too low. I was thinking like 76.

CSL · 09-25-2009, 05:02 PM

True. That extra 1 stat point might be the difference between him throwing 4 picks or 5 picks

buttsakk · 09-25-2009, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kehlis


	Thank God it's not Donny's job to appease homers.

Right on the money!

RayAllen20 · 09-25-2009, 06:49 PM

HAHA officially the worst thread on OS.

Jake Delhomme's statistics this year so far.

1 Touchdown
5 Interceptions
55.2% completion rate
45.3 QB rating.
2 fumbles
4 fantasy points after two games.
Right now he is ranked as the 31st QB in the league ahead of Stafford.

Plus he has an amazing reciever to throw to in Steve Smith. And do not say the Panthers went 12-4 because of Jake Delhomme. Steve Smith, Smash and Dash, and a good defense. Delhomme INDIVIDUALLY lost a playoff game to the Cards (not too great of a defense) in one of the worst playoff performances in history. Delhomme as a 75 is perfect. Donny Moore obviously watches and knows more football than you do.

And the Nick Mangold debate? Was that a serious statement? Mangold being a 95 is outrageous is dumber than saying Jake Delhomme is good. Mangold is arguably the best center in the game. Although I might give that to Saturday or Hartwick. Plus have you watched any Jets games recently? Have you personally scouted Mangold. I bet you havent even watched him play.

Sorry for going off but this is one of the worst thread ever. Most biased thing i've ever seen. Your team is 0-2 and isnt very good. We should be lowering them not increasing their ratings.

/end rant

EQuipT · 09-25-2009, 08:01 PM

wow, i can't believe you just said that, delhomme is actually probabaly one of the worst qbs this season, and i'd be surprised if he doesn't get benched by seasons end

ianlast · 09-25-2009, 10:24 PM

What a ridiculous thread; it actually gives me great comfort that Donny Moore is on your "bad side", as it means he's not appeasing idiotic homers.

jwoodson15 · 09-26-2009, 12:31 AM

Making him an 87 would make him better or as good as these QB's which he is not.

Joe Flacco
Tony Romo
Jay Cutler

He would be a backup for every other team in the NFL. He is rated higher than Kyle Orton but I would rather have Orton as my starter. I'm sure its not Jake's fault he cant tell which players are his teamates when he throws though.

cv15x · 09-26-2009, 01:08 AM

If Delhomme is an 85, then Sanchez is a 257.

09-25-2009, 04:53 PM	#17
JkA3 Strategy OVR: 36 Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Denver Posts: 858 Blog Entries: 3	re: Jake Delhomme ratings 75 just MIGHT be too low. I was thinking like 76.

09-25-2009, 05:02 PM	#18
CSL Pro OVR: 8 Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: England	re: Jake Delhomme ratings True. That extra 1 stat point might be the difference between him throwing 4 picks or 5 picks __________________ Yeah.

09-25-2009, 06:49 PM	#20
RayAllen20 MVP OVR: 36 Join Date: Jun 2009 Blog Entries: 19	re: Jake Delhomme ratings HAHA officially the worst thread on OS. Jake Delhomme's statistics this year so far. 1 Touchdown 5 Interceptions 55.2% completion rate 45.3 QB rating. 2 fumbles 4 fantasy points after two games. Right now he is ranked as the 31st QB in the league ahead of Stafford. Plus he has an amazing reciever to throw to in Steve Smith. And do not say the Panthers went 12-4 because of Jake Delhomme. Steve Smith, Smash and Dash, and a good defense. Delhomme INDIVIDUALLY lost a playoff game to the Cards (not too great of a defense) in one of the worst playoff performances in history. Delhomme as a 75 is perfect. Donny Moore obviously watches and knows more football than you do. And the Nick Mangold debate? Was that a serious statement? Mangold being a 95 is outrageous is dumber than saying Jake Delhomme is good. Mangold is arguably the best center in the game. Although I might give that to Saturday or Hartwick. Plus have you watched any Jets games recently? Have you personally scouted Mangold. I bet you havent even watched him play. Sorry for going off but this is one of the worst thread ever. Most biased thing i've ever seen. Your team is 0-2 and isnt very good. We should be lowering them not increasing their ratings. /end rant __________________ I will always, always be a Jets fan. But trust me it hurts.

09-25-2009, 08:01 PM	#21
EQuipT Rookie OVR: 2 Join Date: Jul 2009	re: Jake Delhomme ratings wow, i can't believe you just said that, delhomme is actually probabaly one of the worst qbs this season, and i'd be surprised if he doesn't get benched by seasons end

09-25-2009, 10:24 PM	#22
ianlast Rookie OVR: 10 Join Date: Mar 2008 Blog Entries: 1	re: Jake Delhomme ratings What a ridiculous thread; it actually gives me great comfort that Donny Moore is on your "bad side", as it means he's not appeasing idiotic homers.

	MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
	New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
	Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?

09-26-2009, 12:31 AM	#23
jwoodson15 Rookie OVR: 7 Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Pennsylvania Blog Entries: 1	re: Jake Delhomme ratings Making him an 87 would make him better or as good as these QB's which he is not. Joe Flacco Tony Romo Jay Cutler He would be a backup for every other team in the NFL. He is rated higher than Kyle Orton but I would rather have Orton as my starter. I'm sure its not Jake's fault he cant tell which players are his teamates when he throws though. __________________ DENVER BRONCOS (8-4) WEST VIRGINIA MOUNTAINEERS (9-3)

09-26-2009, 01:08 AM	#24
cv15x Rookie OVR: 1 Join Date: Jul 2009	re: Jake Delhomme ratings If Delhomme is an 85, then Sanchez is a 257.

More Links

Jake Delhomme ratings