Do you prefer 08 or 09 CB play

[xxxxdemonxxxx]

Personally I think both have its good and bad points
I liked how the DB's reacted in 08 where-as now alot of the time they can be easily burnt on drag/quick post routes even if you adjust.
Does anyone miss the ability for the WR to outjump the DB?

[cdon2k]

08's easily, yeah, they were a bit too tight in their coverage but at least you could play man d...

[Unforgiven]

08 by far. I'm so damn tired in 09 of the DB's never seeing the ball, and then jumping 10 ft in the air and blocking the ball with their back

[edubbs]

Man D is pretty much useless in 09.

And I'm worried that it will be back but, overblown in 10'.

This franchise has always had problems balancing things like DB coverage.

They have all of these individual player ratings that 'seem' to do nothing EVERY year on the field.

Every DB and almost every team always play too much alike.

They need to find a way to get these ratings to translate to the game on the field. Right now the ratings often are just window dressing IMO.

[LBzrule]

Neither. 08 cheated and 09 is worthless.

[db56]

I vote for 09, although it needs a lot of work, the no call pass interference on the fly routes gets old quick.

[xxxxdemonxxxx]

Hey Ian or Phil I know you cant state specifics but are there any major changes to db coverage and ratings playing an actual role in how the computer calls plays and plays in general.