Amongst my friends, the method didn't amount to more than the user holding the trigger, scanning the field no differently than we did in the past, then double tapping the appropriate pass button. The extra .2 seconds it took to double tap the buttong eliminated the effect on the QB and none of us ever felt looked off. The cone was meaningless.
And I disagree that a cone is necessary. My suggestion
here is very similar. It's at least cleaner and it can stop the user from overcoming the effect on the QB.
|
Quote: |
|
|
|
|
Originally Posted by splff3000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is always the ultimate debate among Madden gamers. Some say it's a gimmick and some say it's sim. I can understand why some may not like it because of the way it was implemented before, but I don't understand why some would call it a gimmick. According to this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gimmick
"In marketing language, a gimmick is a unique or quirky special feature that makes something "stand out" from its contemporaries. However, the special feature is typically thought to be of little relevance or use. Thus, a gimmick is a special feature for the sake of having a special feature. "
How can you say the cone is of no use or relevance? You all may not like it, but it is far from a gimmick. I would be interested in seeing a poll asking who's for/against the vision cone. Either way, I know the results would be closer than the poll asking about keeping/removing lead blocker control. lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't mean to imply I thought it was a gimmick. I just felt it was ugly & uneffective.