More Links

RigorousXChris · 04-07-2009, 05:03 AM

Vote on whether you want potentials set in stone:

Post for more ideas.

Glorious Arc · 04-07-2009, 05:07 AM

this

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glorious Arc


	I suggested earlier that the Pot be show as a 1-99 stat and instead of having a cap on skills(unless they are physical ratings) that pot be how quickly a player can grow with how well he produces. You could draft a Alex Smith who looks to be a great QB but he has no pot therefore even if he were to produce very well he wouldnt grow quickly. On the other hand you could get a Mario Williams with great talent and solid pot become a supwer star. You could also get a Jay Cutler/Tom Brady who has everything you look for in a QB and Has great pot. Brady took off like a bat outta heck when he got his first starts that would be the example of a player with 90+ pot.

kcarr · 04-07-2009, 05:14 AM

I voted hidden. I think all ratings should be hidden at least in terms of the actual number values that run the game

Exonerated · 04-07-2009, 05:51 AM

Why would you think they are set in stone?

It was not set in stone in HC09.

Logically it wouldn't.

kcarr · 04-07-2009, 06:30 AM

head coaches weren't set in stone. More like set in sand. They could move, just not completely freely. I don't mind this, it just isn't as important to me either way as the idea of hiding the ratings

View Poll Results: Potentials Set in Stone?
Yes - Original Idea	2	10.53%
Yes - But hidden at ALL TIMES	2	10.53%
Yes - But can be exceeded on rare occasions	9	47.37%
No - Change based on performance	5	26.32%
No - Do it some other way	1	5.26%
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll

04-07-2009, 05:03 AM	#1
RigorousXChris Rookie OVR: 2 Join Date: Apr 2009	Potential Set in stone? Vote please. Vote on whether you want potentials set in stone: Post for more ideas. Last edited by RigorousXChris; 04-07-2009 at 05:05 AM.

04-07-2009, 05:14 AM	#3
kcarr MVP OVR: 20 Join Date: Sep 2008	Re: Potential Set in stone? Vote please. I voted hidden. I think all ratings should be hidden at least in terms of the actual number values that run the game

04-07-2009, 05:51 AM	#4
Exonerated All Star OVR: 33 Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Sydney, Australia	Re: Potential Set in stone? Vote please. Why would you think they are set in stone? It was not set in stone in HC09. Logically it wouldn't.

04-07-2009, 06:30 AM	#5
kcarr MVP OVR: 20 Join Date: Sep 2008	Re: Potential Set in stone? Vote please. head coaches weren't set in stone. More like set in sand. They could move, just not completely freely. I don't mind this, it just isn't as important to me either way as the idea of hiding the ratings

	MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
	New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
	Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?

More Links

Potential Set in stone? Vote please.