Can someone explain pre-created rookies in '10?

[vanderbiltfan87]

I know the names of players are random each time. What about their schools?

[kwpit79]

Quote: Originally Posted by kcarr

I don't know, the 90/10 was just a guess. it will be heavily weighted toward random though with just a small set group for presentation and as a shout out for us HC09 guys.

It just sucks that you would have to purpossely not draft some of the top players in order to not feel like you are cheating. I fought a losing battle on this one. Maybe next year.

[AndyBernard]

hope the rookies have a different feel to them, and that each class isn't the same players over and over

also would love for the draft to be top heavy at some positions, and not so much at others


this has potential to be great, but it also has alot of little things that could trip it up, and result in having to bring your draft classes over from ncaa

[kcarr]

Quote: Originally Posted by kwpit79

It just sucks that you would have to purpossely not draft some of the top players in order to not feel like you are cheating. I fought a losing battle on this one. Maybe next year.

I think as long as they make the set players the actual top few picks in the class it will help this. Also, I would say have no known busts as set named players. That way, the most it will effect is making those few top end picks guaranteed some years. That way even if you are going to go after them there is serious cost involved both to acquire the picks (if the fix trade logic) and to pay the rookies (assuming they really have the contract logic down).