Will the REAL REVIEWERS please stand up?!!!!

[roadman]

Quote: Originally Posted by MAzing87

Not a ***** at all, but what does ProTak really add to the game?

This is taken from here.

http://insideblog.easports.com/defau...ts&PageIndex=2



At its core, PRO-TAK is actually a collection of a few animation technologies. Though it stands for ‘procedural tackling’, we were able to create some new features sharing the technology (that we are also putting under the can PRO-TAK umbrella):
1. Dynamic gang tackling: New never-before-seen tackling engine in a video game that allows up to 9 players to be involved in a tackle – including offensive and defensive players pushing the pile forward / backward.
2. Steerable tackles: Dynamically manipulating tackle animations based on player ratings means the difference between a first down or a punt.
3. All new OL/DL Interaction system: With steerable and branch-able animation technology, we can now create a true dynamic pocket around the QB as well as a true “flow” to the ball on run plays.
4. QB avoidance: Branch-able animation technology allows for QB’s to shift around the pocket as well as break out of sack animations after they have already started.
5. Fight for the fumble: Dynamic fumble pileups allow possession to change hands while at the bottom of the pile.

[Deus]

Check out my mini review here

[sois]

Quote: Originally Posted by roadman

With the present economy, what company isn't getting sacked? It's not just EA.

http://www.google.com/finance?q=NASDAQ:ERTS&fstype=ii

It's looking grim over at EA. Negative 1 BILLION net income?

That's sad to me. That means cut backs, that means less development. Less everything.

[Netherscourge]

Quote: Originally Posted by fourthreemafia

Its funny how people act like Pro Tak adds nothing to the game. Its easy to spot the haters.

It's also easy to spot the fanboys who jump on the slightest thing and assume it's a criticism.

I didn't say it didn't add to the game. I meant to infer that it's not an innovative or amazing new system.



Pro-Tak is a bunch of triggered scripts. Lets not get all crazy here acting like it took a team of advanced coding specialists to devise the most complicated algorithm in known mathematics...

[metallicatz]

Quote: Originally Posted by fourthreemafia

Its funny how people act like Pro Tak adds nothing to the game. Its easy to spot the haters.

No doubt. Funny how you don't see them in "The little things" thread where you have to say something nice about the game and give it credit. Coincidence? I think not.

[sois]

Quote: Originally Posted by Netherscourge

It's also easy to spot the fanboys who jump on the slightest thing and assume it's a criticism. I didn't say it didn't add to the game. I meant to infer that it's not an innovative or amazing new system. Pro-Tak is a bunch of triggered scripts. Lets not get all crazy here acting like it took a team of advanced coding specialists to devise the most complicated algorithm in known mathematics...

I would argue otherwise. I am by no means a fanboy, but it seems that Pro Tak is more than triggered scripts.

I am betting it did take some hardcore time/effort/money/research.

Either one of us could be wrong though.

I do agree that it doesn't really add that much to the game, certainly not to be called a feature. It's a basic football element. Nothing chest pounding about it.

[Netherscourge]

Quote: Originally Posted by sois

I would argue otherwise. I am by no means a fanboy, but it seems that Pro Tak is a little more than triggered scripts. I am betting it did take some hardcore time/effort/money/research. Either one of us could be wrong though. I do agree that it doesn't really add that much to the game, certainly not to be called a feature. It's a basic football element. Nothing chest pounding about it.

Well, at least we agree on something

[LAKE4742]

Quote: Originally Posted by Renegade44

Yeah some of these reviews are a little sketchy. With the improvements that still need to be made, and the fact that they worked so much on presentation and it still isnt implemented correctly and has issues, I cant see someone giving the game a score over 90. Just cause its the "best madden on next gen" doesnt mean its an auto 95 or sonthing. as a game on its own it needs to be rated and once you digest the kool aid its only a decent game.

Quote: Originally Posted by Netherscourge

The way I see it, Madden 10 is a back-to-basics Madden. EA added stuff that should already be in the game (online franchise, cut-scenes, gang tackles). And likewise, Madden is still missing stuff that was in previous games (play editor). It's nice to see progress, but I'm not impressed by the basics. Basic features are a foundation for innovation. Where's the innovation at? Unfortunately, there's no innovation yet. Just lots of eye candy and graphic tweaks. Madden 10 get's a 80% for me. They are doing well with basics, but I'm not overly impressed. ...IMO Still, it's the only current NFL football video game in town and should satisfy me for a couple months.

Good responses.

But, TBH, this thread was actually born due to 1UP. I couldn't believe that when I saw it. But, those other scores simply don't make sense to me, either.

Seriously, 1UP, Madden 09-10.0? Madden 10-8.3?