Home

Who would you rather have at QB? (NCAA Draft)

This is a discussion on Who would you rather have at QB? (NCAA Draft) within the Madden NFL Last Gen forums.

Go Back   Operation Sports Forums > Football > Madden NFL Football > Madden NFL Last Gen
ESBC Roster - The Best We've Ever Seen in a Boxing Game?
PES 2021 Team Spirit Guide - Understand Chemistry on a New Level
MLB The Show 21 Diamond Dynasty Budget Beasts
Poll: What's more important to you, when the time comes to purchase a game? (Click to vote)
View Poll Results: Who should be drafted?
Terrelle Pryor 14 24.14%
Jimmy Clausen 44 75.86%
Voters: 58. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-09-2009, 11:36 AM   #9
MVP
 
mavfan21's Arena
 
OVR: 12
Join Date: Jul 2007
Re: Who would you rather have at QB? (NCAA Draft)

Use the Madden generated drafts and draft
Spoiler
. The Terrelle Pryor clone. Better than the real Pryor.

But if you insist on imports go with Clausen.
__________________
Don't look back too long and don't look too far ahead.
mavfan21 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2009, 11:59 AM   #10
MVP
 
OVR: 26
Join Date: Sep 2008
Blog Entries: 1
Re: Who would you rather have at QB? (NCAA Draft)

As stated above, you need to find out their S M D ratings because throw accuracy has no meaning(for the pre-made drafts, I cant be positive about the imports) Take a look at their pentagons and figure out about how much more accurate the other is.

If it turns out like I would assume Clausen will have a better arm, better awareness, and better overall. The only reason why I would take Clausen is because you are simming 12 of your games. He will put up far greater stats right off the start and your team will be super bowl bound in no time.(In madden, if you have a good QB when simming you will win most of your games)

Taking Pryor runs the risk of losing for several more years just to get similar production that Clausen will be capable from the start. If you played every game though...Or care about fun instead of winning all the time...Pryor would be extremely fun to play with.
Glorious Arc is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2009, 12:35 PM   #11
Rookie
 
OVR: 4
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Malden, MA
Blog Entries: 1
Re: Who would you rather have at QB? (NCAA Draft)

Neither. Clausen will not make it in the NFL. Neither will Pryor.
NFLFanSince1979 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 12-09-2009, 12:39 PM   #12
Banned
 
OVR: 36
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tennessee
Blog Entries: 6
Re: Who would you rather have at QB? (NCAA Draft)

Quote:
Originally Posted by NFLFanSince1979
Neither. Clausen will not make it in the NFL. Neither will Pryor.
got a physic(sp?) in the house , while ur hear ive got a few questions

when will the world end?
Why was man created?
who will win this years superbowl?
will back breaker be better than madden?
will madden 11 have the ability for the wr to win a jump ball?
True Blue Titan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2009, 02:04 PM   #13
16 Time World Champion
 
Nature_Boy's Arena
 
OVR: 30
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Gotham City
Posts: 927
Blog Entries: 5
Re: Who would you rather have at QB? (NCAA Draft)

Pryor.
Nature_Boy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2009, 02:31 PM   #14
Pro
 
OVR: 12
Join Date: Sep 2008
Re: Who would you rather have at QB? (NCAA Draft)

Alright, I went with Pryor, and I feel like it was a better choice than Clausen, here are the Stats for both of them. Clausen is a little bit better passer, but Pryor should progress and become a good passer and he is a much better runner than Clausen.

Terrelle Pryor (78 OVR)
Passing ratings
AWR- 64
THP- 92 (with +3 from trainers)
SAC- 77
MAC- 76
DAC- 72
RUN- 82
PAC- 78
Rushing ratings
SPD- 92
STR- 72
AGI- 93
ACC- 97
CAR- 82
TRK- 78
ELU- 89
SFA- 83
JKM- 92
SPM- 88
BCV- 81

Jimmy Clausen (75 OVR)
Passing Ratings
AWR- 56
THP- 95
SAC- 82
MAC- 74
DAC- 65
RUN- 80
PAC- 84
Rushing ratings
SPD- 75
STR- 57
AGI- 73
ACC- 79
CAR- 68
TRK- 42
ELU- 43
SFA- 39
JKM- 53
SPM- 54
BCV- 51
Dianwei32 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2009, 03:01 PM   #15
Once in a Lifetime Memory
 
Yeah...THAT Guy's Arena
 
OVR: 19
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: DC
Posts: 16,895
Re: Who would you rather have at QB? (NCAA Draft)

Quote:
Originally Posted by True Blue Titan
got a physic(sp?) in the house , while ur hear ive got a few questions

when will the world end?
Why was man created?
who will win this years superbowl?
will back breaker be better than madden?
will madden 11 have the ability for the wr to win a jump ball?
The guy that says Pryor is a better NFL prospect in real life is giving the guy that says neither is a good prospect crap.. just wow. Even if you don't see Clausen as a good NFL prospect, which most people do, there is absolutely no way that you can possibly argue that Pryor looks like a good NFL prospect.
__________________
NFL: Bills
NBA: Bucks
MLB: Cubs
NCAA: Syracuse
Soccer: USMNT/DC United

PSN: ButMyT-GunDont
Yeah...THAT Guy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Advertisements - Register to remove
Old 12-09-2009, 04:37 PM   #16
Hall Of Fame
 
KBLover's Arena
 
OVR: 40
Join Date: Aug 2009
Blog Entries: 14
Re: Who would you rather have at QB? (NCAA Draft)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dianwei32
Alright, I went with Pryor, and I feel like it was a better choice than Clausen, here are the Stats for both of them. Clausen is a little bit better passer, but Pryor should progress and become a good passer and he is a much better runner than Clausen.
Pryor looks like he'll have a better deep and intermediate pass also. Clausen would be a West Coast offense's dream it seems. 82 SAC already?
KBLover is offline  
Reply With Quote
Reply


« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Operation Sports Forums > Football > Madden NFL Football > Madden NFL Last Gen »


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:13 AM.

Top -