Well that's not what I want. What I'm saying is there is no way to disguise straight up man coverage. Either you are 10 yards off or you line up in their face. So if I see off coverage I know that there's a chance curls are wide open. Either it's man, which means curls are money, or it's Zone with a defender coming up underneath. Not hard to notice right off the bat.
My problem is playing cover 2 man and it looking like cover 2 man. If I run this my CBs hang out with an 8 yard cushion. It does me no good, unless I'm running a zone it's an easy completion. Why should I have to PRESS or call or Press default formation if I want my DBs to line up on the line of scrummage.
If I have good CBs, I want to line up on the LOS because it makes people audible out of the curl routes because they aren't sure if it's press or regular coverage. As of now, any off coverage = Man or Zone, if it's Man it's an easy curl route, if it's zone you tell on the snap and your other routes are open.
All I want is D alignments to be less transparent.