many problems in ccm

[heime2003]

i found the progression in ccm has many flaws

so far ive played 21 seasons as chiefs gm and some position has too many 85+ rating players and some position rarely any decent players

overprogressed position: DT LE RE

underprogressed position: WR CB SS FS OLB

what do u think?

[Old School SD Fan]

Assume you are referring to the CPU's players. Haven't noticed it but I'm only in season 10 and I don't spend hours analyzing other teams. I will say on the whole progression seems pretty darned good especially in comparison to past years. At least the NFL isn't flooded with 99 players as in certain past versions.

[Dempseylicious23]

Quote: Originally Posted by heime2003

i found the progression in ccm has many flaws so far ive played 21 seasons as chiefs gm and some position has too many 85+ rating players and some position rarely any decent players overprogressed position: DT LE RE underprogressed position: WR CB SS FS OLB what do u think?

I find that the worst offenders for underprogression are the LB (MLB mainly) positions and the FS/SS. If you're not simply simming through all the seasons, you can help your OLB's out (and conversely stall your LE/RE) by using the LB pass rush packages or altering the depth chart directly. It will help your LB's get much needed sacks which are great for progression.

SS and FS are a bit slow. I've only managed to get Kam Chancellor from an 88 to a 90 over the span of 40 games (two seasons where I made the superbowl and about to play the third game of my third season). I've even upgraded him to superstar progression.

[heime2003]

computer does terrible job at progressing their potential pro bowlers

sometimes i get sick of giving my players points manually but i cant

use autoprogress cuz i know com isnt capable.