AFC South player ratings at IGN

[ifiok25]

AFC South ratings are now up at IGN.

http://sports.ign.com/articles/635/635703p1.html

[Thrasha]

I think the ratings are too high and too low for some of my Titans but I'll take it.

McNair should be a little more than 90 IMO, his only down part is how prone he is to injury.

Nice rating for Randy Starks, 85 overall

[ed08]

I think the ratings are "fair". Mcnair have a 69 in the injury category so that probably explain the drop compared to madden 05.

[Nza]

Pacman is the ultimate Madden CB - before 25 he will be 90+ easily. Look at those physical ratings!

Bulluck goes doen 2 from last year, and yet LB's like Lewis continue to somehow manage a 99....*shrug*

McNair shouldn't be so powerful and so inaccurate, 88 power 90 accuracy better depicts McNair IMO.

Chris Brown should be around McGahee's rating but fails to surpass 90 OVR. He has 93 break tackle though, what a beast he will be in Madden.

Henry is 87 according to a screenshot at MaddenPlanet which is sweet, two very powerful will make the Titans a killer franchise mode team.

[Nza]

Oh and as for overrating - Hanesworth and Starks got off incrediblt easy, Albert particularly, I mean 89 OVR for what? Anyway, EA said they do base some ratings of predictions, and if they're thinking what i'm thinking, before the season's over, Albert and Randy will be a very dominant DT duo in the NFL. I think Albert's change of heart will come through this season in a big way.

Chris Brown also got off easy injury rating wise, very easy.

I also think Tank got a very generous rating.

One thing i'm confused about is the Texans - from the final team ratings, they had like a 80+ offense and defense, yet their individual ratings kinda suck.

[coogrfan]

The Texans look about right imo, no complaints.

[Dzson]

i think they should use a whole new rating system all together but so far they look'n accurate