Why does EA have one big flaw each year?

[ChicagoNVA]

Quote: Originally Posted by jfsolo

It just goes to show you how we all have a different opinion of what is a flaw. I think the fumbles and injuries are perfect, and I'm worried that too many people are going to complain and get them changed/reduced for next year.

I guess we do..

I don't owe ea anyting to not call it how I see it. I will continue to play the game..it's a very good game, but some of the interceptions are over the top.

This is just my opinion.

[Steeler99]

Quote: Originally Posted by ChicagoNVA

I wouldn't go as far as saying gamekiller. I have bought NCAA every year since 95 and this is probably the most annoyed I have been with the game. If it's not interceptions, it's the fumbling and if that is not enough to worry about.. I play on eggshells because of a rash of injuries. Maybe it's just my bad luck...

I'll have to agree with you. Played my first game today (play now), and by halftime I had four injuries with one being a season ending injury to Mike Hart of Michigan. On top of that there were 5 turnovers in the first half as well! Very early on yet, but so far this is the worst ncaa game I have played .... wish I would have rented first!!!

[bkrich83]

It's funny people compained there weren't injuries. Now there is a realistic amount of them, and people complain there are too many.

[ChicagoNVA]

Quote: Originally Posted by bkrich83

It's funny people compained there weren't injuries. Now there is a realistic amount of them, and people complain there are too many.

Well I have never been the one to complain about issues in a game before... but how realistic is it to have your Running Back Depth Chart gutted because my top 3 running backs were injured in consecutive weeks.. 2 out for 9 weeks and my 3rd bum out for 5 weeks and I didn't even like him.

Nevermind I found the solution.

I will fire my strength and conditioning coach.

[bkrich83]

Quote: Originally Posted by ChicagoNVA

Well I have never been the one to complain about issues in a game before... but how realistic is it to have your Running Back Depth Chart gutted because my top 3 running backs were injured in consecutive weeks.. 2 out for 9 weeks and my 3rd bum out for 5 weeks and I didn't even like him. Nevermind I found the solution. I will fire my strength and conditioning coach.

It happens. I find the injuries great. Depth finally means something.

[Cyros]

Quote: Originally Posted by ChicagoNVA

Well I have never been the one to complain about issues in a game before... but how realistic is it to have your Running Back Depth Chart gutted because my top 3 running backs were injured in consecutive weeks.. 2 out for 9 weeks and my 3rd bum out for 5 weeks and I didn't even like him. Nevermind I found the solution. I will fire my strength and conditioning coach.

Remember Wake Forest last year? They were playing wide receivers at tailback.

[TheShizNo1]

I paid attention to the injuries one game, looked at the injuries and how long they were out. W/ about 6 injuries altogether only one was out for the game.
That's what I find common w/ me, yea their are a lot of injuries but not many stay out. For anyone who's ever played football before that is very normal, you get hurt, get it taped, get back into the game.

I find it to be realistic.

[Resin]

I don't have a problem with the CPU throwing too many interceptions. Of course, I supersim whenever I'm on defense! LMAO