Wow, shocking NCAA test results

[rascocm]

running start

[thedudedominick]

Okay thanks for clarifying. Those numbers were going to be extremely shocking if from a stationary start. If you have time or get a chance I would love to see the standstill 40 times as that is the number we are used to seeing. I assume accel would make a difference in that one as well.

[harrisonial2992]

Yeah. A 40 time irl is always calculated using a stationary start, so trying to create parallels between game speed and 40 time is only relevant if the in game calculation uses a stationary start. I highly recommend you do this and would be interested in the result. Trying different acceleration ratings would be interesting as well.

[rascocm]

Alright guys. I use adjusted sliders and some of you know I rerate every single player with my own system I have used for years (phil steele manual). I just adjusted every player's speed on Boston College's team (only team I have rated so far). I was originally using my old chart that I came up with years ago. The highest speed on the field was a 70 and I think he was a backup. Every player had a 99 ACC. This will screw up dynastys but you could rerate i guess. Anyways, it was the best game I have ever played. There were issues but get this. Since my test chart was on fast, I adjusted then to their real life 40 time using the test chart and played on fast, AA. I was Home Boston College and beat away BC 24-17 scoring on my final drive after a shanked punt. I nearly returned a ko, and I took a jet sweep 49 yards to the 5. The flow of the game was amazing and I found myself cheering, which I have never done. 8 min qtrs. I am taking sack yardage out of rushing.

BC (ME) BC (CPU)
10 FD 12 FD
13-27 121 passing 1 int 15-25 180 passing 1 int
26-144 rushing (inc 49 on wr jet sweep) 24-82 rushing
4 drops 2 drops
1 Pancake 0 Pancake
They sacked me 4 times I sackd them 3 times
My top def had 8 tkls There's had 8
I punted 6 times They punted 5
57 plays 52 plays

I think if I had loner quarters, stats could have been better. Our Rbs both had around 3.5 ypc.

[rascocm]

I did try acc rating from 100-0 in increments of 25, with a 99 spd rating, from the 11 yard line and timed from 10-gl and there was np differece in 100 to 0. I will try a standing start. There was also no diff in speed from human to cpu and I do have auto sprint on. I did running start bc it is hard to time and run from 40 at the same time.

[mmorg]

Quote: Originally Posted by rascocm

I did try acc rating from 100-0 in increments of 25, with a 99 spd rating, from the 11 yard line and timed from 10-gl and there was np differece in 100 to 0. I will try a standing start. There was also no diff in speed from human to cpu and I do have auto sprint on. I did running start bc it is hard to time and run from 40 at the same time.

Of course there is no difference. They have a running start and the same top speed. You need to learn about the scientific method before you start running experiments.

[rascocm]

From the 41 and a 1/2, and rb bumped into line at 40 and as soon as he scooted into the hole exactly on the 40 (he had to stop), 99 speed and 99 acc, 3.75.

[rascocm]

Quote: Originally Posted by mmorg

Of course there is no difference. They have a running start and the same top speed. You need to learn about the scientific method before you start running experiments.

They do not have a running start straight ahead when they have to clear the line right up the middle. Hey, I am trying to help, and I am sorry I don't have a degree in rocket science.