Dynamic Injuries "Wear and Tear"

[Tovarich]

As easy as it to say let's have a realistic number of injuries, realistic cause etc etc, I don't think it's reasonable to have a realistic number of injuries until we have larger rosters. A real college team might have 10 players throughout the depth chart unavailable for any given game, but they have 85 scholarship players plus a bunch of walkons. We are limited to 70. I think they actually do a decent job of sort of pro-rating, if you will. This isn't entirely tied to the concept of wear and tear, but I think that's something needing to be taken into account as well.

[Sundown2600]

Quote: Originally Posted by GruffyMcGuiness

I like that idea. The injuries they have no are pretty dumb. I'd like to actually see linemen get hurt because it seems like only QB, HB, WR and LB's get hurt.

Lowering OL and DL injury ratings to 40-50 will see them get hurt in game. This works for all positions. No need to adjust QB, HB, WR because as you say they get hurt most often.