More Links

Razorbacker · 07-01-2004, 10:57 PM

CrH:

I just re-read the interview over at EAS with the producer of the game and he says 2005 has 70 man rosters.

Producer Interview

I hope they didn't trim it to 62. That wouldn't even be an increase to even matter.

antybaktyrial · 07-01-2004, 10:58 PM

I hope that there were just 62 spots because he got an early version or he didn't know what he was talking about. I remember the guys that went to E3 that got to play the game were reporting that there were 70 men rosters.

Longhorn33 · 07-01-2004, 10:58 PM

Quote:

penz said:
The cornerbak prospect on page 2 is 6'5" 169. Is it just me or is that way too thin?

6'5" is pretty tall for a DB and 169 is way to skinny..I would put him on roids and move him to wr

heelsman22 · 07-01-2004, 10:59 PM

i think the deal with the 62 man roster is that if you come up short of your alloted amount of players it will show up as 62/62 or 69/69. i remember this happened to me last year when i played a dynasty. he said he lost 16 players and i doubt TCU had a full 70 man roster to begin with so that would leave him short of the maximum even with his 11 recruits mentioned. thats just my two cents tho but we will find out soon enough.

Cyros · 07-01-2004, 11:00 PM

Quote:

Longhorn33 said:

Quote:

penz said:
The cornerbak prospect on page 2 is 6'5" 169. Is it just me or is that way too thin?

6'5" is pretty tall for a DB and 169 is way to skinny..I would put him on roids and move him to wr

If he could pack on enough weight and deliver a solid hit you'd be looking at a star OLB as long as that speed stays up.

cliburn · 07-01-2004, 11:07 PM

Quote:

Cyros said:

Quote:

Longhorn33 said:

Quote:

penz said:
The cornerbak prospect on page 2 is 6'5" 169. Is it just me or is that way too thin?

6'5" is pretty tall for a DB and 169 is way to skinny..I would put him on roids and move him to wr

If he could pack on enough weight and deliver a solid hit you'd be looking at a star OLB as long as that speed stays up.

. . . or one Hell of a ball-hawking free safety!

Jistic · 07-01-2004, 11:07 PM

Do I take this to mean that there will be All-COnference teams this year? YES!

Ifiok · 07-01-2004, 11:08 PM

Quote:

penz said:
The cornerbak prospect on page 2 is 6'5" 169. Is it just me or is that way too thin?

Hopefully you will still be able to change a player's height and weight.

07-01-2004, 10:57 PM	#9
Razorbacker Rookie OVR: 4 Join Date: Jul 2002	Re: Recruiting info at IGN CrH: I just re-read the interview over at EAS with the producer of the game and he says 2005 has 70 man rosters. Producer Interview I hope they didn't trim it to 62. That wouldn't even be an increase to even matter.

07-01-2004, 10:58 PM	#10
antybaktyrial Rookie OVR: 0 Join Date: Apr 2004	Re: Recruiting info at IGN I hope that there were just 62 spots because he got an early version or he didn't know what he was talking about. I remember the guys that went to E3 that got to play the game were reporting that there were 70 men rosters.

07-01-2004, 10:58 PM	#11
Longhorn33 Operation Sports Fan OVR: 9 Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Texas Posts: 309	Re: Recruiting info at IGN Quote: *penz said:* The cornerbak prospect on page 2 is 6'5" 169. Is it just me or is that way too thin? 6'5" is pretty tall for a DB and 169 is way to skinny..I would put him on roids and move him to wr

07-01-2004, 10:59 PM	#12
heelsman22 MVP OVR: 11 Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: North Carolina Posts: 1,257	Re: Recruiting info at IGN i think the deal with the 62 man roster is that if you come up short of your alloted amount of players it will show up as 62/62 or 69/69. i remember this happened to me last year when i played a dynasty. he said he lost 16 players and i doubt TCU had a full 70 man roster to begin with so that would leave him short of the maximum even with his 11 recruits mentioned. thats just my two cents tho but we will find out soon enough.

07-01-2004, 11:00 PM	#13
Cyros ULTRAAAA!!!! OVR: 30 Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: The Metroplex Posts: 12,631	Re: Recruiting info at IGN Quote: *Longhorn33 said:* Quote: *penz said:* The cornerbak prospect on page 2 is 6'5" 169. Is it just me or is that way too thin? 6'5" is pretty tall for a DB and 169 is way to skinny..I would put him on roids and move him to wr If he could pack on enough weight and deliver a solid hit you'd be looking at a star OLB as long as that speed stays up.

	MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
	New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
	Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?

07-01-2004, 11:07 PM	#14
cliburn Th* Cmmshnkv OVR: 15 Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Oklahoma City Posts: 2,836	Re: Recruiting info at IGN Quote: *Cyros said:* Quote: *Longhorn33 said:* Quote: *penz said:* The cornerbak prospect on page 2 is 6'5" 169. Is it just me or is that way too thin? 6'5" is pretty tall for a DB and 169 is way to skinny..I would put him on roids and move him to wr If he could pack on enough weight and deliver a solid hit you'd be looking at a star OLB as long as that speed stays up. . . . or one Hell of a ball-hawking free safety!

07-01-2004, 11:07 PM	#15
Jistic Hall Of Fame OVR: 28 Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Chicago, ILL Posts: 16,404	Re: Recruiting info at IGN Do I take this to mean that there will be All-COnference teams this year? YES!

07-01-2004, 11:08 PM	#16
Ifiok Rookie OVR: 2 Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: Hermitage, TN	Re: Recruiting info at IGN Quote: *penz said:* The cornerbak prospect on page 2 is 6'5" 169. Is it just me or is that way too thin? Hopefully you will still be able to change a player's height and weight.

More Links

Recruiting info at IGN