Errors that are ruled hits

[tabarnes19_SDS]

I'm not exactly sure at what point I started noticing this, but after one of the recent patches I'm seeing ground balls that are booted by the cpu and human ruled hits. We have been discussing in the Q and A.

Countryboy had this example
www.youtube.com/embed/YoDy85YdzaE

Here's an example of one I've had
https://youtu.be/v4Acurj9NyY

Is anyone else seeing this and what triggers it?

Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk

[kinsmen7]

Quote: Originally Posted by tabarnes19

I'm not exactly sure at what point I started noticing this, but after one of the recent patches I'm seeing ground balls that are booted by the cpu and human ruled hits. We have been discussing in the Q and A. Countryboy had this example www.youtube.com/embed/YoDy85YdzaE Here's an example of one I've had https://youtu.be/v4Acurj9NyY Is anyone else seeing this and what triggers it? Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk

I'm more upset about Happ getting that 50/50 call for the K on baby Vlad...is that Angel Hernandez back there umping, or what?!?!?

But yes, I've noticed it a handful of times. Nothing as egregious as that though...Mine have been similar to CB's, where I can sit and say "Hmmm, I guess that could be considered a hit...", though I had a similar play last night where Altuve was rightly given the error.

[Mrfrosty]

Quote: Originally Posted by kinsmen7

I'm more upset about Happ getting that 50/50 call for the K on baby Vlad...is that Angel Hernandez back there umping, or what?!?!? But yes, I've noticed it a handful of times. Nothing as egregious as that though...Mine have been similar to CB's, where I can sit and say "Hmmm, I guess that could be considered a hit...", though I had a similar play last night where Altuve was rightly given the error.

I sent these to a buddy of mine telling him that Hernandez must be behind the plate. All these were called balls in the same game. I, much like the blue, had no clue where the zone was

Sent from my GM1915 using Tapatalk

[tabarnes19_SDS]

Quote: Originally Posted by kinsmen7

I'm more upset about Happ getting that 50/50 call for the K on baby Vlad...is that Angel Hernandez back there umping, or what?!?!? But yes, I've noticed it a handful of times. Nothing as egregious as that though...Mine have been similar to CB's, where I can sit and say "Hmmm, I guess that could be considered a hit...", though I had a similar play last night where Altuve was rightly given the error.

I'm wondering if your rightful error was with the feet stationary? Seems to be when there is movement side to side and that animation is triggered.

Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk

[NYJin2011tm]

It’s one thing for an ump to have a strike zone but some of the real life ones these days are all over the place. It’s like a random strike zone.

[countryboy]

Now here is an error recorded correctly.

Difference with this one versus the other one, is that Moncada is in front of the ball in ideal fielding position when he bobbles it.

I'm thinking it has to do with the fielder going into a backhand or stretching animation that is causing it to register as a hit versus an error.

[tabarnes19_SDS]

Quote: Originally Posted by countryboy

Now here is an error recorded correctly. Difference with this one versus the other one, is that Moncada is in front of the ball in ideal fielding position when he bobbles it. I'm thinking it has to do with the fielder going into a backhand or stretching animation that is causing it to register as a hit versus an error.

I agree with the feet planted works, when moving ruled a hit.

Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk

[countryboy]

Quote: Originally Posted by tabarnes19

I agree with the feet planted works, when moving ruled a hit. Sent from my SM-G988U using Tapatalk

It's the only thing I can figure out thus far.

Whats bad is the commentary supports it being ruled an error, but the scoring decision not so much.