Roster Sharing

[mcarr74]

Anything on this ?

[rangers9911]

Nothing official that I am aware of. However it is safe to say that it won't be included.

[Travolterjohn]

Minimum would be a Roster Transfer from NHL 21 to NHL 22. It makes me sick to work every year more than hundred hours to create +300 Players with best possible looking appearance

[kinsmen7]

Quote: Originally Posted by Travolterjohn

Minimum would be a Roster Transfer from NHL 21 to NHL 22.

Can't see that happening either...MLB removed for this years version because of the jump to PS5.

Quote: Originally Posted by rangers9911

Nothing official that I am aware of. However it is safe to say that it won't be included.

Agreed 100%. I have very little faith that this will be anything more than a fresh coat of paint in the form of frostbite, with some fancy "x factors" that do nothing from a sim/AI tendency point of view, and instead just end up with creating an even more "arcade-y" type game than we've already got.

Ugh. I feel like a "negative Nancy" when I talk about this game, and I absolutely hate that. I just really, really see the potential that this game *could* have. Heck, I'd take roster sharing and nothing else at this point. 21 could be somewhat fixed with sliders, and roster sharing would take it to the next level.

[stooge 1010]

I hope(but I doubt it) multiple team control in franchise


Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports

[northmen24]

They won’t add roster share. If they did you could get away with buying the game every 3-4 years without missing a thing. For offline play anyways. You might miss out on wearing a snow suit playing pond hockey though.

[duhitsrandy]

Quote: Originally Posted by northmen24

They won’t add roster share. If they did you could get away with buying the game every 3-4 years without missing a thing. For offline play anyways. You might miss out on wearing a snow suit playing pond hockey though.

i get this argument but i also hate it. I feel like most established roster creators move on to the next years game anyway so if anything the lack of support on an old years rosters would incentivize people to follow on to the next year even if it's a little further down the line.

[babaracus88]

Quote: Originally Posted by northmen24

They won’t add roster share. If they did you could get away with buying the game every 3-4 years without missing a thing. For offline play anyways. You might miss out on wearing a snow suit playing pond hockey though.

You mean EA might actually have to add something to the game each year, rather than just an updated roster??? to get people to buy the game. That's a bold strategy cotton