NCAA 14 - OS Community + Playmakers Split Sliders

[TheShizNo1]

Quote: Originally Posted by Matt10

Yeah 55 is good - but make sure ratings are matching up - so check the STR rating of the DL, as well as Shed Block. STR doesn't matter for the running game - it's been tested - just RBK mainly. It sucks because RBK is like an OVR that should be made up of STR,Agilitiy, Acceleration, Stamina, etc. But here's the nice thing, use 55 - then adjust the RBL from there if it gets to become too hard. That's why we have it @ zero - so you can work from there with the RBK edit.

What do you mean by making sure ratings match up?

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

[Matt10]

Quote: Originally Posted by TheShizNo1

What do you mean by making sure ratings match up? Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

Basically making sure the ratings make sense. For example, if you lower RBK to 55 - and see a DE shedding blocks @ a 30 or 50 rating; it might mean 55 is too effective and needs to be compensated with slider adjustment. If that doesn't work - then change 55 to 60, and so on until max of 65.

[derrickj1]

Why do you guys play on 8-9 minutes? I thought 5 minutes was long enough.

[gatorsinRENO]

Quote: Originally Posted by derrickj1

Why do you guys play on 8-9 minutes? I thought 5 minutes was long enough.

To get as close as possible to the actual number of plays ran in college football.

[Chedapalooza]

Quote: Originally Posted by SECElit3

Great example: cover two sink, running back out of the backfield into flat, split slot shotgun set: Int: 65 - ROLB will frequently pass the RB off to the corner and sit in his zone, against this offensive set the RB into the flat is the only threat to his zone. He should be following the RB into the flat, yet he chooses to sit in his zone even though there is no threat. It looks to me as if he is baiting, because he immediately breaks on the ball when it is thrown to the RB INT: 0 - The ROLB goes to the flat with the RB almost every single time. He rarely passes off the RB and more frequently covers the back as he is supposed to.

(character count)

[jackson]

How so we edit all rbk? Wouldn't that negate your advantage of your o line is superior? Please explain

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

[mkharsh33]

So what we're saying here is this: the only value these sliders have is if I lower ALL my Offensive Linemen's run block ratings down to 55, making EACH of them the same type of run blocker, creating a bland/vanilla approach for my team?

Just want to make sure I understand this...

(And I've also read where guys are doing to this their tight ends and full backs as well)?

Thanks for any clarification...

[jb12780]

Quote: Originally Posted by mkharsh33

So what we're saying here is this: the only value these sliders have is if I lower ALL my Offensive Linemen's run block ratings down to 55, making EACH of them the same type of run blocker, creating a bland/vanilla approach for my team? Just want to make sure I understand this... (And I've also read where guys are doing to this their tight ends and full backs as well)? Thanks for any clarification...

Yes 55 for your team. Other stats will depend on success. Leave TE's and FB's alone.

It works out really well.

Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2