Collection Help!!!

[Dylonus]

So... who do you ACTUALLY need for collections?

I tried to do the Indians and it turns out several players aren't even needed; like Lindor....

So, does that mean no Kimbrel for the Padres is needed??

Anyone know the lists of who is / isn't actually needed per team?

[madden34]

any players with an overall below the legend's overall you need. Like the angels you dont need trout for carew.

[Orange Krush]

Quote: Originally Posted by madden34

any players with an overall below the legend's overall you need. Like the angels you dont need trout for carew.

This. However, if you have a higher overall player, like trout, he can substitute for one of the lower players, but he will be locked after you complete the collection and you can't sell him.

[Dylonus]

Quote: Originally Posted by Orange Krush

This. However, if you have a higher overall player, like trout, he can substitute for one of the lower players, but he will be locked after you complete the collection and you can't sell him.

WAIT, WHAT?

What's this mean?? Please explain thoroughly.

[Dylonus]

Quote: Originally Posted by Orange Krush

This. However, if you have a higher overall player, like trout, he can substitute for one of the lower players, but he will be locked after you complete the collection and you can't sell him.

So wait, I could do the D'Backs right now if i got everyone except Goldy?

[Orange Krush]

You only need the players who are lower than the legend to complete the collection. For the Diamondbacks, you don't need Pollack or Goldschmidt because they are above the legend. It should say you need 37 players, that's because there are 37 below the legend. You only need 37, so you can substitute a higher overall guy in for a lower one, but he will get locked when you complete the collection.

[HuntTaker14]

Quote: Originally Posted by Dylonus

WAIT, WHAT? What's this mean?? Please explain thoroughly.

Ok, so trout is a 99 and over Carew in the angels collection. So you wouldn't have to get someone such as Pujols because you already have one player better..........


Take this pic for example, say I would of had Miggy before locking the collection. If I would of, I would not had to get Price

[PhilliesFan13]

Quote: Originally Posted by HuntTaker14

Ok, so trout is a 99 and over Carew in the angels collection. So you wouldn't have to get someone such as Pujols because you already have one player better.......... Take this pic for example, say I would of had Miggy before locking the collection. If I would of, I would not had to get Price

Yes, you would not have needed Price.