NCAA Football Over The Years

[majesty95]

Blue Dude said it pretty well.

Hopefully Microsoft and Sony have learned from their release on current gen and the uproar from developers. The 360 has already made significant strides. We just need Sony to follow suit.

I've been a Sony supporter for many years and always thought it was the lack of power on the 360 holding the games back. in fact, it was the near rocket science sophistication of the PS3 and the 13 manuals needs to program for it.

Wether we like it or not, these two companies are tied together. All cross platform games face the same issues, making a game that fits as well as possible onto both systems, which are inherently different.

It makes sense that both console manufacturers and EA have learned from their mistakes. I would expect EA to delay the release of next gen Madden ad NCAA if needed to get a more robust game engine to build off of. They know the difficulty they faced with this one, so it would behoove them to start with a better foundation next time.

Also, there won't be near as big of a rush to develop games for this new generation. The gap between current gen and the 720/PS4 will be much less significant than the one we saw from last gen to current gen. Plus, the economy still hasn't rebounded so the amount of people rushing out to upgrade will be lower as well.

I could be wrong and we repeat this cycle all over again, but I would probably bet against that.

[mcpheje]

I'm an optomistic guy by nature so I too will hope for the best. However, looking at those numbers from a business perspective is troubling. If the numbers don't rebound, there are a couple of other possibilities that come into play: 1) some level of changes within the Development team or 2) discontinue making the game (as seen with the March Madness series). I would expect the company to go with option 1 prior to resorting to option 2. However at some point it'll cost the company more money to make the game than what they'll earn in revenue. The sales numbers are interesting but the profit numbers would be much more informative.

All said and done I hope the series gets a chance to evolve onto the next generation of consoles.

[fistofrage]

750K in sales seems bad, but honestly how much time, effort, and resources went into NCAA 2013? It feels stale like NCAA 12.5 and from what I can tell, it looks like a couple interns were assigned to the task of adding a couple bells and whistles to NCAA 2012 while noone concerned themselves with fixing or adding items to the game that have been missing or needing fixing for years. I'd be interested to see what their break even point is and how much they actually paid in salaries to produce this game.

The AI option is broken now. The AI safety play is broken. The Penalty sliders for clipping, pass interference, etc. don't work at all. The QB accuracy slider has little to no effect. The list goes on. Let alone the plethora of features we had on the PS2 that still haven't made it to this generation.

EA will phase out NCAA football as the sales deteriorate. They are already preparing you for it with no draft class imports into Madden.

I have played the game since Bill Walsh football. Bought a copy every single year. Some years, it was the only game I bought for the system. And now, if it went away, I wouldn't miss it. The game is sick and tired, and I am sick and tired of trying to find work arounds and house rules to try to make the game as decent as it was 6 or 7 years ago on the PS2.

EA better hope there is a whole new generation of gamers that embrace college football and who never played a PS2. Because anyone who had NCAA 2004-2006 on the PS2 is left shaking their head and walking away from the game.

[majesty95]

Wow, so much to address.

I'll start with the sales numbers. While they are troubling, the 750k current is early. However, I doubt many more copies will be sold when Madden releases so it could be indicative of a huge overall decline.

I, too, am concerned that NCAA may go the way of March Madness. However, I think by looking at the history of sales for the franchise, there is something there with this game. They just have to recapture it.

College basketball was considerably less popular than football and they had two companies making the game (which have both now folded). It's possible but I don't think that's their where this game is going. NCAA can and has been very profitable and it would be foolish to walk away from that.

As far as Madden not having draft class imports. That is because of the new connected careers. They wanted to have draft profiles for all of the players that would play into the Twitter feeds an what not and show all of that off. You just can't have detailed profiled for CPU generated recruits imported from NCAA (at least not as detailed). I expect we will see that make its return eventually. But I could see them leaving it out too since NCAA now has it's own draft feature.

Pertaining to the game being "broken", that is a term too easily thrown around. Broken indicates unplayable. There is nothing unplayable with this game. Is it perfect? No. Is it flawed? Yes. Is it broken? No.

I know there are people who don't even want to play the game because of the coverage (and I'm not far off. It's extremely frustrating). However, look at the poll on here about how satisfied people are with the game. For the most part, people are much more satisfied with 13 at release than they were with 12. That doesn't show in the sales numbers so that may show that OS is more of the hardcore gamers. But if that is true then the hardcore gamers are, by and large, happy as a whole (which I find interesting).

The thing you have to keep in mind is the trend we have seen lately. When they "fix" one thing, something else breaks. Why is that?

The easy thing to do is say that EA is incompetent. Is it really that simple? Then why is 2k having numerous issues that are getting worse each year? How about MLB The Show? New issues have popped up with that game and it's ratings are going down.

I revert it back to the game engine that they are working off of and the complexity of programming. The game engine limits them in what they can do. The complexity of programming hinders their implementation. Yes, they have been programming for 6-7 years on next gen, but they're still working off of an inferior game engine. It's like building a mansion on a mud.

That's why they fix one thing and another breaks. I can imagine that is terribly frustrating for them. With millions of lines of code all relating to each other in some way, good luck finding every bug and fixing it in a way that doesn't negative effect something else.

I've taken elementary programming. It's hard. People who are good at programming have said programming on next gen, especially PS3, is beyond hard. Having to program a game that works smoothly on BOTH systems...I can only imagine.

That's why I think the new game engine will finally get us going in the right direction. They have 6-7 years of experience now and know what their limitations have been and the things that have given them the most problems. They can use that to build an engine that not only better utilizes the capabilities of both systems, but also makes it easier for them to find/fix/address bugs and gameplay issues.

I'm not claiming that it will be perfect and certainly not flawless (this generation of games never will be). But I do think we are headed back towards the glory days of 04-07. For that, I think we can all get excited.

[SanDiegoTrojans]

NCAA 07 was perfection to me. I still play it on the old xbox to this day.

[SlickRick11]

I find these numbers interesting.....I knew there was a decline but it just shows that more people stuck to their guns about not buying the game anymore than I intially thought, hopefully this gets EA's attention enough to fix the bugs and make the game more enjoyable like we all remember they were during the PS2 days

[cptnclutch28]

As far as programming goes yes it is very difficult. It's not easy to make the game play perfectly. Do I think there will ever be a perfect game? No Everyone says that they want a simulation game but in reality if that was the case are people really wanting to have to make passing decisions in less than 3 seconds? I don't believe so. People say that they should implement tiered defensive play calling but in reality yes it works but this is video game world and unless people want to sit there for 2 hours to play one game? No. People want options for the hardcore sim games and the casual gamers so that everyone can be happy but it's not that easy.

I think right now as "flawed" as the game is its still the best that it's been in recent years. There are ways to make the game play the way you want it to as far as sliders and all of that stuff. We are in a world that expects more out of everything we do. We get a game that has good passing mechanics and now the pass coverage is broken. We want a realistic pass rush but if the lineman dont pick up everyone on every play then the pass blocking is broken. We want WR/DB interactions but now that they have worked on that it's not good enough. So what is it that we really want out of these GAMES that will make us happy?

[Joobieo]

Quote: Originally Posted by mcpheje

I'm an optomistic guy by nature so I too will hope for the best. However, looking at those numbers from a business perspective is troubling. If the numbers don't rebound, there are a couple of other possibilities that come into play: 1) some level of changes within the Development team or 2) discontinue making the game (as seen with the March Madness series). I would expect the company to go with option 1 prior to resorting to option 2. However at some point it'll cost the company more money to make the game than what they'll earn in revenue. The sales numbers are interesting but the profit numbers would be much more informative. All said and done I hope the series gets a chance to evolve onto the next generation of consoles.

I doubt they will ever get rid of NCAA Football , the fan base is much larger than march madness was . At least I hope it never gets to that point .