I wanted to solicit opinions on what you guys do in terms of what you tell your scouts to look for...
First, playing mostly as Arsenal, I use 5/5 scouts—or 4/4 at worst simply because that’s most realistic, and they can afford it. With that said, I typically do ‘any’ for player type, as that gives me the widest range of players in the reports each month.
After watching
BamaStriker9's video on scouting physically strong players, I did a test CM last night w/ Everton and sent 3 scouts all for physically strong, and got a lot of defenders, CM, and CDM (as the video implied we would!). Also had a couple of ST and CF, and one random RM (attacker…hm?). Physically strong players (per his findings) have higher physicals than others--which, can't be trained (but do actually grow this year!).
This brings me to my issue of work rates and WF/skill move ratings. It’s a real downer to scout a player for months or have him in the YA only to bring in a ST that has L/H WR, or 1*WF and 2*skills. So, what I’ve started doing is saving my career, then signing all players I’m interested in to the senior team to check their WR and WF/skill ratings. For example, I had an awesome looking CB last night, 6’4 or something, 16 years old, 58 rated, 85-94 pot, but was a L/L WR and 2*WF and 1* skills. UGH. Thoughts on this process/method?
I'll hang up and listen