More Links

fossen · 09-05-2003, 10:39 AM

Quote:

TCrouch said:
I think that's the key, Foss. Sim a couple games instead of a season, or better yet, play a couple. I think the minimum tackles thing is big, but why you'd have to have X number of tackles to count for sacks is rough.

Yeah. Not to get all T-SQL on your a$$, but maybe it's a "SELECT TOP 300 * FROM players ORDER BY tackles".

I.E. Grabbing X number of players based on their tackles, then not re-querying on each sort, but just re-sorting the recordset they already have.

OK. Just bored myself.

rock85 · 09-05-2003, 10:41 AM

Thats my same question i have 4 min simm quaters but i play on 7 min quaters i think if u put it up to 9 or 10 min quaters u r going to have unrealilistic stats or am i wrong

evilive · 09-05-2003, 10:42 AM

There is another thread around where a guy simmed at 4 minutes and had some good stats. He compares them to last years NFL stats.

THe rushing totals were low as were the receptions, but everything else was ok.

Heelfan71 · 09-05-2003, 10:43 AM

I play on 9 and sim on 5 right now.

tigerx82 · 09-05-2003, 10:45 AM

same with passing also, I didnt have vick in the league leaders either cuz he didnt have enough attempts or completions after week 1. 11-17 156 yards. 2 tds.

I think they might have been trying to get rid of the problem where a player who has about 2 pass attempts ended up being the leader in QB rating.

So they implemented a qualifier or something.??

Jistic · 09-05-2003, 10:45 AM

Quote:

fossen said:

Quote:

TCrouch said:
I think that's the key, Foss. Sim a couple games instead of a season, or better yet, play a couple. I think the minimum tackles thing is big, but why you'd have to have X number of tackles to count for sacks is rough.

Yeah. Not to get all T-SQL on your a$$, but maybe it's a "SELECT TOP 300 * FROM players ORDER BY tackles".

I.E. Grabbing X number of players based on their tackles, then not re-querying on each sort, but just re-sorting the recordset they already have.

OK. Just bored myself.

rock85 · 09-05-2003, 10:46 AM

I'm saying i think the simmed quaters(4) are right but i think the 9 or 10 min quaters r to much am i right or r they realilistic enough Heel help me out here

MMan · 09-05-2003, 10:47 AM

Quote:

rock85 said:
I'm saying i think the simmed quaters(4) are right but i think the 9 or 10 min quaters r to much am i right or r they realilistic enough Heel help me out here

It depends how much time you take to pick a play... I started at 7, went to 8, went to 9 now I might go to 10

09-05-2003, 10:39 AM	#17
fossen Blbflth zp! OVR: 28* Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Salt Lake City, UT Posts: 7,098	Re: League Leaders Bug?? Quote: *TCrouch said:* I think that's the key, Foss. Sim a couple games instead of a season, or better yet, play a couple. I think the minimum tackles thing is big, but why you'd have to have X number of tackles to count for sacks is rough. Yeah. Not to get all T-SQL on your a$$, but maybe it's a "SELECT TOP 300 * FROM players ORDER BY tackles". I.E. Grabbing X number of players based on their tackles, then not re-querying on each sort, but just re-sorting the recordset they already have. OK. Just bored myself.

09-05-2003, 10:41 AM	#18
rock85 MVP OVR: 17 Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: New Jersey	Re: League Leaders Bug?? Thats my same question i have 4 min simm quaters but i play on 7 min quaters i think if u put it up to 9 or 10 min quaters u r going to have unrealilistic stats or am i wrong

09-05-2003, 10:42 AM	#19
evilive Rookie OVR: 2 Join Date: Oct 2002	Re: League Leaders Bug?? There is another thread around where a guy simmed at 4 minutes and had some good stats. He compares them to last years NFL stats. THe rushing totals were low as were the receptions, but everything else was ok.

09-05-2003, 10:43 AM	#20
Heelfan71 Hall Of Fame OVR: 44 Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Georgia Posts: 19,942 Blog Entries: 4	Re: League Leaders Bug?? I play on 9 and sim on 5 right now.

09-05-2003, 10:45 AM	#21
tigerx82 Banned OVR: 7 Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Atlanta	Re: League Leaders Bug?? same with passing also, I didnt have vick in the league leaders either cuz he didnt have enough attempts or completions after week 1. 11-17 156 yards. 2 tds. I think they might have been trying to get rid of the problem where a player who has about 2 pass attempts ended up being the leader in QB rating. So they implemented a qualifier or something.??

	MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
	New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
	Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?

09-05-2003, 10:45 AM	#22
Jistic Hall Of Fame OVR: 28 Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Chicago, ILL Posts: 16,404	Re: League Leaders Bug?? Quote: *fossen said:* Quote: *TCrouch said:* I think that's the key, Foss. Sim a couple games instead of a season, or better yet, play a couple. I think the minimum tackles thing is big, but why you'd have to have X number of tackles to count for sacks is rough. Yeah. Not to get all T-SQL on your a$$, but maybe it's a "SELECT TOP 300 * FROM players ORDER BY tackles". I.E. Grabbing X number of players based on their tackles, then not re-querying on each sort, but just re-sorting the recordset they already have. OK. Just bored myself.

09-05-2003, 10:46 AM	#23
rock85 MVP OVR: 17 Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: New Jersey	Re: League Leaders Bug?? I'm saying i think the simmed quaters(4) are right but i think the 9 or 10 min quaters r to much am i right or r they realilistic enough Heel help me out here

09-05-2003, 10:47 AM	#24
MMan The Broski OVR: 12 Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Minny Posts: 1,834	Re: League Leaders Bug?? Quote: *rock85 said:* I'm saying i think the simmed quaters(4) are right but i think the 9 or 10 min quaters r to much am i right or r they realilistic enough Heel help me out here It depends how much time you take to pick a play... I started at 7, went to 8, went to 9 now I might go to 10

More Links

League Leaders Bug??