MLB 15 trade discussion thread

[AC]

Re: MLB 15 trade discussion thread

Based on the spreadsheet you're not getting Strasburg because he is a Cy Young and HoF material.

Not sure I see how those are equal.

I didn't make this spreadsheet and I just got back from a week long trip and I am in no way affiliated with this and isn't this from about 75 pages ago

jesus

[mills3669]

Re: MLB 15 trade discussion thread

OK, need some suggestions here. Looking for a good deal involving papelbon

[Bard]

Re: MLB 15 trade discussion thread

OK, need some suggestions here. Looking for a good deal involving papelbon

Tigers are who i'm thinking about dealing him off to, Rondon from Detroit is an interesting name due to injuries. Pair him up with a low C and I think there is a deal to be made.

[mills3669]

Re: MLB 15 trade discussion thread

Alright sounds good. Thanks

[doctorduck]

Re: MLB 15 trade discussion thread

I've just reached September in my Red Sox franchise and was thinking ahead to the off season. If I'm not able to resign Napoli or Ortiz retires, who would be a good trade candidate at 1st? Would Goldschmidt be attainable? Seems like a great fit for Fenway and the Dbacks have the 2nd worst record. The only prospect that's not available from me is Swihart since he's already the starter on the MLB team hitting .280

[redsox4evur]

Re: MLB 15 trade discussion thread

I've just reached September in my Red Sox franchise and was thinking ahead to the off season. If I'm not able to resign Napoli or Ortiz retires, who would be a good trade candidate at 1st? Would Goldschmidt be attainable? Seems like a great fit for Fenway and the Dbacks have the 2nd worst record. The only prospect that's not available from me is Swihart since he's already the starter on the MLB team hitting .280

Then you are not getting Goldy. I don't see anyway they give up a young MVP candidate without getting the team's most valuable prospect in return.

[QuestGAV]

Re: MLB 15 trade discussion thread

Then you are not getting Goldy. I don't see anyway they give up a young MVP candidate without getting the team's most valuable prospect in return.

The Sox have enough other prospects to make up for that, especially if you're willing to part with Moncada. It's tough but not completely impossible.

[doctorduck]

Re: MLB 15 trade discussion thread

The Sox have enough other prospects to make up for that, especially if you're willing to part with Moncada. It's tough but not completely impossible.

I don't think I would give up enough to get him. I was thinking of giving them 4 to 6 prospects instead of those two. Like Owens+Devers+Margot+ a few others. Who would be a good target with 1 or 2 of those three headlining the deal?

[QuestGAV]

Re: MLB 15 trade discussion thread

I don't think I would give up enough to get him. I was thinking of giving them 4 to 6 prospects instead of those two. Like Owens+Devers+Margot+ a few others. Who would be a good target with 1 or 2 of those three headlining the deal?

Yeah you're talking something crazy like Owens, Rodriguez, Devers, Margot, Kopech, and Cecchini. Even then I think it's tough for them to say yes without a ML ready bat.

[Totte]

Re: MLB 15 trade discussion thread

I've just reached September in my Red Sox franchise and was thinking ahead to the off season. If I'm not able to resign Napoli or Ortiz retires, who would be a good trade candidate at 1st? Would Goldschmidt be attainable? Seems like a great fit for Fenway and the Dbacks have the 2nd worst record. The only prospect that's not available from me is Swihart since he's already the starter on the MLB team hitting .280

Freddie Freeman was discussed a couple of pages back in this thread. That could be an option

[agentlaw13]

Re: MLB 15 trade discussion thread

Looking to make a move in my Indians chise. I'm 3 games under .500 but only about 7 games out of first in the division. Just brought up Lindor to big league club. Looking for a RH bat and a back of rotation starter. Prefer an outfielder with some moderate speed and some pop. Looking to platoon with Moss. Would like to move Raburn, Swish, and McAllister/Tomlin. Prefer to keep Lindor, Frazier, and Naquin. Just looking for some trade possibilities.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[doctorduck]

Re: MLB 15 trade discussion thread

Freddie Freeman was discussed a couple of pages back in this thread. That could be an option

I looked at him. Deal made sense but Napoli was cheaper to resign than I thought. Got him back on a 1 year 6 million deal with a team option for a second year. Plus Ortiz didn't retire so 1st/DH are taken care of for 2016. Might revisit Freeman after the next year

[HolyStroke3]

Re: MLB 15 trade discussion thread

Can we get the spreadsheet added to the OP??

Also, a few guys listed with the A's aren't in the organization anymore:
Jason Hammel, John Jaso, Josh Lindblom, Hiroyuki Nakajima, Derek Norris, and a few others I think

[Totte]

Re: MLB 15 trade discussion thread

Also, a few guys listed with the A's aren't in the organization anymore:

Jason Hammel, John Jaso, Josh Lindblom, Hiroyuki Nakajima, Derek Norris, and a few others I think

Thanks, I'll make sure they're updated

[nyqu1st]

Re: MLB 15 trade discussion thread

It's back - the 2015 OS Realism & Trade Value Spreadsheet: http://1drv.ms/1E9fo0C

I've gone back and updated last years version with the transactions that happened during the off-season, added guys missing from the 2015 40-man rosters AND added every single prospect that was in the 2014 BA Prospect Handbook.

Kudos to AC and 37 among others for helping me throughout last season and keeping the doc fresh with values and helpful insight.

To make the spreadsheet even better, please let me know if you stumble across a player that's changed teams and I'll correct that asap.

Don't forget that you can use CTRL+F to quickly search for players in the spreadsheet.

I've updated my sig with the link as well

Good work. I think just by looking over the first few names that Montero is misplaced. You still have him on the D'backs and he's now on the Cubs. If I see anything else I'll let you know.