MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Nulap
    Rookie
    • Jul 2013
    • 196

    #3706
    Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

    Brinson and Ortiz for Lucroy and Jeffress

    Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk

    Comment

    • Tmizzle
      Rookie
      • Aug 2012
      • 370

      #3707
      Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

      Twins got Hextor Santiago for Nolasco and Meyer...I'm really doing that deal in my franchise as the Twins
      Follow my Twins franchise http://www.operationsports.com/Tmizzle/dynasty/

      Comment

      • Daonlyjmo7
        MVP
        • May 2014
        • 1052

        #3708
        Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

        Originally posted by Nulap
        Brinson and Ortiz for Lucroy and Jeffress

        Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
        Rangers are crazy good, big steal here, I'm not sold on Brinson.
        Check out my dynasty: Rise to the Top: The Coaching Career of Joshua Morgan (NCAA 14)

        Comment

        • GamecocksLaw17
          MVP
          • Jun 2015
          • 1503

          #3709
          Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

          Originally posted by Tmizzle
          Twins got Hextor Santiago for Nolasco and Meyer...I'm really doing that deal in my franchise as the Twins
          Lucroy isn't a moron after all is he? Arlington is a hella good place to play plus no state income tax is like a tiny tiny pay bump

          Comment

          • KayOtic723
            Pro
            • Sep 2011
            • 794

            #3710
            Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

            And again all the prospect in the world and nats do nothing to help the bullpen we needed more then just a closer I would of gave up Ross or Lopez maybe Taylor only two I wouldn't have gave up was Lucas Giolito and Trea Turner


            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

            Comment

            • Nulap
              Rookie
              • Jul 2013
              • 196

              #3711
              Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

              Mets get Niese back from the Pirates

              Comment

              • GamecocksLaw17
                MVP
                • Jun 2015
                • 1503

                #3712
                Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                This last hour has been so awesome. I love the trade deadline

                Comment

                • GamecocksLaw17
                  MVP
                  • Jun 2015
                  • 1503

                  #3713
                  Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                  Fox, Matt Duffy and Chris Shaw for Matt Moore. That feels like an overpay

                  Comment

                  • redsox4evur
                    Hall Of Fame
                    • Jul 2013
                    • 18169

                    #3714
                    Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                    So now that Lucroy has moved. I'm thinking I can give up Francis Martes and Kyle Tucker for Lucroy straight up. That's my #3 & 4 prospects. And I don't feel a need for Jeffress (sp?).


                    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
                    Follow me on Twitter

                    Comment

                    • BDaniels20
                      Rookie
                      • Aug 2014
                      • 62

                      #3715
                      Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                      Originally posted by AC
                      Beltran and Guyer project for the same production RoS...
                      You'd know better than me but how much do these RoS projections change when you take out Beltrans huge negative on defense. Looking at Zips RoS the offensive projections dont even compare

                      Comment

                      • GamecocksLaw17
                        MVP
                        • Jun 2015
                        • 1503

                        #3716
                        Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                        Originally posted by redsox4evur
                        So now that Lucroy has moved. I'm thinking I can give up Francis Martes and Kyle Tucker for Lucroy straight up. That's my #3 & 4 prospects. And I don't feel a need for Jeffress (sp?).


                        Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
                        That seems reasonable to me. Maybe check and see if Daz Cameron or Tucker is performing better/has the higher Potential and go with whichever is better/higher POT

                        Comment

                        • AC
                          Win the East
                          • Sep 2010
                          • 14951

                          #3717
                          Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                          Originally posted by BDaniels20
                          You'd know better than me but how much do these RoS projections change when you take out Beltrans huge negative on defense. Looking at Zips RoS the offensive projections dont even compare
                          You mean move him to DH? They don't. His positional adjustment takes a hit and it evens out. He's not even projected that badly on defense. But they're 10% off offensively and similar defensively. They're pretty even.



                          So much dumn this trade deadline.
                          "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                          Comment

                          • redsox4evur
                            Hall Of Fame
                            • Jul 2013
                            • 18169

                            #3718
                            Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                            Originally posted by GamecocksLaw17
                            That seems reasonable to me. Maybe check and see if Daz Cameron or Tucker is performing better/has the higher Potential and go with whichever is better/higher POT

                            Well Cameron is the 9th best prospect in the system. So I don't think that would be enough.


                            Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
                            Follow me on Twitter

                            Comment

                            • GamecocksLaw17
                              MVP
                              • Jun 2015
                              • 1503

                              #3719
                              Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                              Originally posted by redsox4evur
                              Well Cameron is the 9th best prospect in the system. So I don't think that would be enough.


                              Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
                              I just wasn't sure which roster you used and I know Cameron has a high POT in some of the rosters.

                              To go on a completely different topic, I think the Dodgers are going to get unfairly **** on for "not going all in" I know there is injury stuff but Rich Hill has been elite when healthy and Reddick is a really good RF

                              Comment

                              • KayOtic723
                                Pro
                                • Sep 2011
                                • 794

                                #3720
                                Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

                                Originally posted by GamecocksLaw17
                                I just wasn't sure which roster you used and I know Cameron has a high POT in some of the rosters.



                                To go on a completely different topic, I think the Dodgers are going to get unfairly **** on for "not going all in" I know there is injury stuff but Rich Hill has been elite when healthy and Reddick is a really good RF


                                Do you think they should of made a package deal to White Sox to pull off the Sale trade that included Puig? IMO the trade with the A's works out better knowing they would had to pay "Kings Ransom" for Sale


                                Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                                Comment

                                Working...