MLB lockout

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • KingOfLanglade
    Pro
    • Feb 2018
    • 706

    #271
    Re: MLB lockout

    Originally posted by aholbert32
    Families can go to ML games if they want to. The issue is making them want to.

    Baseball is the one sport that is still economically feasible to take a family to relatively speaking. My wife, in-laws, and I went to Sox/Brewers and Giants/Brewers for $50 per person this summer. All four teams were in 1st place, and the weather was BEAUTIFUL!

    The reason I bring this up is because I sat next to a teenager during the Sox/Brewers Game. He maybe looked up from his phone 5 times the whole game, and asked if it was over in the 7th inning.

    Baseball may never recapture the nation, but it also doesn’t have to die with the next generation. Change should be embraced by those who claim to love the sport and all it has done for some of us.

    Comment

    • bryanm1982
      MVP
      • Nov 2016
      • 3788

      #272
      Re: MLB lockout

      They would never do this but the time between innings should be reduced. Local broadcasts are 2 minutes and 5 seconds. Cut that down to 90 seconds and you cut down 9 minutes there. They already do show split-screen commercials during mound visits or other dead ball times. So that will help offset the commercial money lost.
      Follow me on Twitch

      https://twitch.tv/bryanm1982

      Dodgers Franchise

      https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing

      Comment

      • ninertravel
        MVP
        • Aug 2015
        • 4833

        #273
        Re: MLB lockout

        I think the main problem that is happened in the last 5 years is the strikeout rate home runs and walks rather then 'balls in play'' where banning the shift is suppose to 'fix this' but a pull hitter is always gonna go that way regardless. the Ortiz of the world.

        Comment

        • aholbert32
          (aka Alberto)
          • Jul 2002
          • 33106

          #274
          Re: MLB lockout

          Originally posted by bryanm1982
          They would never do this but the time between innings should be reduced. Local broadcasts are 2 minutes and 5 seconds. Cut that down to 90 seconds and you cut down 9 minutes there. They already do show split-screen commercials during mound visits or other dead ball times. So that will help offset the commercial money lost.
          I dont think the players or union would agree to this. Split screen commercials generate less revenue. Less revenue for the TV networks equals smaller rights fees from TV networks in the next negotiation. Smaller rights fees equals less revenue to split amongst the teams and players. That equals lower salaries for the players.

          Comment

          • ninertravel
            MVP
            • Aug 2015
            • 4833

            #275
            Re: MLB lockout

            So now MLB are saying those 'games can be made up' if a deal is done tomorrow and season be pushed back just 1 week..

            seriously... the threat didn't work so now they are trying 'we will give you 6 or 7 games back if you make a deal now'

            Stop giving fans false hope here that there is a chance of a proper season!
            Last edited by ninertravel; 03-07-2022, 10:30 PM.

            Comment

            • Fullmetalpanic7
              Rookie
              • Mar 2009
              • 37

              #276
              Re: MLB lockout

              Let's also not forget the players response to the threat of a shortened season was they wouldn't agree to expanded playoffs...

              Honestly, both sides just sound like petulant children.

              Comment

              • lemarflacco
                Banned
                • Mar 2018
                • 1001

                #277
                Re: MLB lockout

                Originally posted by Fullmetalpanic7
                Let's also not forget the players response to the threat of a shortened season was they wouldn't agree to expanded playoffs...

                Honestly, both sides just sound like petulant children.
                Huh? Its negotiation. The playoff is the only leverage the players really have considered MLB already has a deal in place for the broadcast rights of these expanded playoffs.

                Comment

                • Jeffrey Smith
                  MVP
                  • Apr 2014
                  • 1925

                  #278
                  Re: MLB lockout

                  Originally posted by lemarflacco
                  Huh? Its negotiation. The playoff is the only leverage the players really have considered MLB already has a deal in place for the broadcast rights of these expanded playoffs.


                  Yeah, I don’t like any of the back and forth being played out on social media by both sides but I do understand that it is all part of the process.

                  Just wish they had the same sense of urgency earlier on and had worked out a deal by now.


                  Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports
                  MLB: TORONTO BLUE JAYS
                  NFL: MINNESOTA VIKINGS
                  NHL: TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS
                  NBA: TORONTO RAPTORS

                  Comment

                  • lemarflacco
                    Banned
                    • Mar 2018
                    • 1001

                    #279
                    Re: MLB lockout

                    Originally posted by Jeffrey Smith
                    Yeah, I don’t like any of the back and forth being played out on social media by both sides but I do understand that it is all part of the process.

                    Just wish they had the same sense of urgency earlier on and had worked out a deal by now.


                    Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports
                    Yea and everything is literally tied to the CBT. The owners use this as a salary cap. I was looking back and basically only 3 teams a year, at most, have exceeded the CBT. Thats 90% that don't spend over this amount.

                    The cardinals had a payroll of 183 mil in 2016, 7 years ago. Inflation has increased along with values of these franchise but yet 20+ teams payrolls are still under the amount today.

                    11 teams last year (over 30 percent of the league was 100 mil under the tax. Another 10 were over 26 mil under the tax and only one over. These payrolls do not reflect the revenues of the game.

                    Comment

                    • bryanm1982
                      MVP
                      • Nov 2016
                      • 3788

                      #280
                      Re: MLB lockout

                      And I bet you if they do raise it, teams still won't go anywhere near that number. Or at least the same 3 teams will go near that number. Still going to be a top dollar. The owners could say lets raise it to $250. It doesn't mean teams will want or will go that high. And the smaller markets really can't complain that the Dodgers or Yankees are going to go that high cause they don't try to win anyway. LOL
                      Follow me on Twitch

                      https://twitch.tv/bryanm1982

                      Dodgers Franchise

                      https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharing

                      Comment

                      • aholbert32
                        (aka Alberto)
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 33106

                        #281
                        Re: MLB lockout

                        Originally posted by bryanm1982
                        And I bet you if they do raise it, teams still won't go anywhere near that number. Or at least the same 3 teams will go near that number. Still going to be a top dollar. The owners could say lets raise it to $250. It doesn't mean teams will want or will go that high. And the smaller markets really can't complain that the Dodgers or Yankees are going to go that high cause they don't try to win anyway. LOL
                        If the players really care about young and midlevel players, they would be focusing solely on a salary floor.

                        Comment

                        • JayhawkerStL
                          Banned
                          • Apr 2004
                          • 3644

                          #282
                          Re: MLB lockout

                          Honestly, as long as The Show comes out, I seriously don't care what MLB and MLBPA do. We have the NBA and NHL playoffs coming up. My favorite Premier League team has been on a massive hot streak, although they got smashed Saturday.

                          Also, the pandemic is essentially over, so I will just spend more money on concerts.

                          I grew up as baseball as my number one sport, from the moment I went to my first baseball game and my dad took me to the Stan Musial stature outside of Busch Stadium. Honestly, in the 70's, it's what made me a real fan. The Cards sucked, but I followed Lou Brock's chase for the stolen base title and then 3000 hits daily.

                          What made baseball so much more than all the other sports, to me, was the stats. It illuminated strategy and retold history in ways that other sports mostly lacked. Well, technology has changed, and now all the sports are as smart as baseball in using tech and data to make smarter decisions both on and off the field.

                          If MLB and the MLBPA don't want to play, my options are so much better now than during any previous work stoppage, that I literally don't care. I'll play the game when it comes out and watch baseball if they ever get around to playing. But I'm not wasting my time worrying about leagues that aren't playing.

                          Comment

                          • aholbert32
                            (aka Alberto)
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 33106

                            #283
                            Re: MLB lockout

                            Originally posted by JayhawkerStL
                            Honestly, as long as The Show comes out, I seriously don't care what MLB and MLBPA do. We have the NBA and NHL playoffs coming up. My favorite Premier League team has been on a massive hot streak, although they got smashed Saturday.

                            Also, the pandemic is essentially over, so I will just spend more money on concerts.

                            I grew up as baseball as my number one sport, from the moment I went to my first baseball game and my dad took me to the Stan Musial stature outside of Busch Stadium. Honestly, in the 70's, it's what made me a real fan. The Cards sucked, but I followed Lou Brock's chase for the stolen base title and then 3000 hits daily.

                            What made baseball so much more than all the other sports, to me, was the stats. It illuminated strategy and retold history in ways that other sports mostly lacked. Well, technology has changed, and now all the sports are as smart as baseball in using tech and data to make smarter decisions both on and off the field.

                            If MLB and the MLBPA don't want to play, my options are so much better now than during any previous work stoppage, that I literally don't care. I'll play the game when it comes out and watch baseball if they ever get around to playing. But I'm not wasting my time worrying about leagues that aren't playing.
                            I kinda feel the same way. The NHL and NBA playoffs have me covered until June. Football starts back in August. I'm good.

                            I'll miss not going to a game this summer but we are really only talking about a 2 mos sports drought for me.

                            I dont think we have to worry about that. This reminds me of the last NBA lockout where the owners really wouldnt engage in good faith until they had to start reimbursing the TV networks. That date is May 1 for MLB so I'm confident we are only going to miss about a month of games at most.

                            Comment

                            • lemarflacco
                              Banned
                              • Mar 2018
                              • 1001

                              #284
                              Re: MLB lockout

                              Originally posted by bryanm1982
                              And I bet you if they do raise it, teams still won't go anywhere near that number. Or at least the same 3 teams will go near that number. Still going to be a top dollar. The owners could say lets raise it to $250. It doesn't mean teams will want or will go that high. And the smaller markets really can't complain that the Dodgers or Yankees are going to go that high cause they don't try to win anyway. LOL
                              I disagree. That number does set the cap for a number of teams. Around 10 teams were right at the line or less than 10 mil below. And you kinda make the point. The Yankees didn't go over, They purposely mad e trade deadline deal giving up salary balance to make sure they stayed under the number.

                              Don't forget its a "tax". Once you go over you even more money in penalties. So a team may be willing to py 5 mil extra but they are not willing to pay the extra 5 plus the tax and then the added tax the next season if they are a repeat offender.
                              Last edited by lemarflacco; 03-08-2022, 03:37 PM.

                              Comment

                              • lemarflacco
                                Banned
                                • Mar 2018
                                • 1001

                                #285
                                Re: MLB lockout

                                Originally posted by aholbert32
                                If the players really care about young and midlevel players, they would be focusing solely on a salary floor.
                                They have addressed service time manipulation and they wanted a large bonus for pre arb/arb players. So it seems like they are addressing it.

                                But how is arguing that the players a solely concerned with younger players?

                                ITs jus ridiculous , even with salary caps, they make these things to protect owners from themselves, Same reasons they limited years on nba contracts. Like just don't sign bad contracts and id like to say if you don't have enough money to tip , you can't afford the restaurant. Same should be with sports, If you don't have the money to spend more than 40 mil on your payroll, than you shouldn't be owning the team

                                Comment

                                Working...