2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Thanks so much for the input I am pretty sure about the Cards deal probably going to shop Cargo a little bit longerComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
What do you guys think?Last edited by LifeOfAHooper27792; 04-23-2013, 04:59 PM. Reason: Just trying to figure out if I'm using the spreadsheet well.Mavericks
Cowboys
Rangers
Stars
FC Dallas
Texas LonghornsComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
PS you're using the spreadsheet just fine lol"Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Comment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Not bad ideas I do want pitching more than anything, but I have a ton of holes to fill so I'm hoping to try to grab at least one position prospect in each of these deals. I am really high on Wacha, Rosenthal, and Kelly, but I feel like I need a position prospect to complete the deal
As far as the Cargo trade, I actually am targeting a the Red Sox explicitly since they have a deep catching pool and Jackie Bradley Jr.Comment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
I don't think the Cards are going to trade Rosenthal and Kelly from an already terrible bullpen IRL. Since you like Kelly's sinker I think a better package would be Wacha, Martinez, Kelly and Adams/Wong. Adams makes more sense because other posters have commented about the weakness at 1st base that the Rockies have and with Adams being blocked by Craig, but it's really up to you.
Miller + Wong + Adams + Jenkins?"Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
What about Wacha, Martinez, Adams, Wong, and Kelly/Jenkins 2 low A's plus 3 B's. The OP said he wanted pitching and that adds 3 good pitching prospects to his system. You could throw in an outfielder like Anthony Garcia (B, with good power) also to sweeten the deal more and his power would translate well in Coors.Comment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
I just don't think offense is that big of a need for the Cardinals to part with Miller. I know Tulo is a stud, but we already put up a ton of runs. As for the bullpen thing, we've already blown 4-5 saves, and the closer role is far from certain, giving away Rosenthal and Kelly would mean we're basically trying to bash our way to wins.
What about Wacha, Martinez, Adams, Wong, and Kelly/Jenkins 2 low A's plus 3 B's. The OP said he wanted pitching and that adds 3 good pitching prospects to his system. You could throw in an outfielder like Anthony Garcia (B, with good power) also to sweeten the deal more and his power would translate well in Coors."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Last I saw with the OSFM rosters Wacha was a low A and so was Martinez. Has that changed with the newest roster set? My bad, I didn't see the should be part. Still they are both low A's in game though.Comment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
You're looking at at least one of Miller/Rosenthal for Tulo, he's a stud."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
The scouting reports I've seen have Martinez, Rosenthal, and Wacha all rated very close to each other, any particular reason you like Rose over the other two? And do you see him as a starter in the future or closer? If it came down to it we'd part with Rosenthal over Miller.Comment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
The scouting reports I've seen have Martinez, Rosenthal, and Wacha all rated very close to each other, any particular reason you like Rose over the other two? And do you see him as a starter in the future or closer? If it came down to it we'd part with Rosenthal over Miller.
Rosenthal + Wong + Adams + Jenkins + that OF you mentioned earlier?"Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
Comment