2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Red Sox: 2018 World Series Champions!!!
Patriots: 2018 Super Bowl Champions!!!
Team USA
Red Sox
Patriots
Celtics
Bruins -
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
What are we going for? Virtual fairness and realness...or reality? You can't have it both ways.Check out my Houston Astros Dynasties:
Holdin' Onto Hope- Completed
Holdin' Onto Hope Part 2: Cranes, Trains, and Auto-Explosions- CompletedComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
I don't have Lind in my franchise any more. What about David Cooper and somebody else???Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
I'm talking about virtual ratings. Some things happen in real life that don't and will never happen in game (i.e. drug/alcohol issues, public anxiety, etc.) and we worry about that. Like say if I ask for Zack Grenkie, we won't put into consideration his anxiety issues because that doesn't matter. I have been pulling for MLB the show to do that, but don't think it'll happen until the PS4.Red Sox: 2018 World Series Champions!!!
Patriots: 2018 Super Bowl Champions!!!
Team USA
Red Sox
Patriots
Celtics
BruinsComment
-
Comment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
I'm talking about virtual ratings. Some things happen in real life that don't and will never happen in game (i.e. drug/alcohol issues, public anxiety, etc.) and we worry about that. Like say if I ask for Zack Grenkie, we won't put into consideration his anxiety issues because that doesn't matter. I have been pulling for MLB the show to do that, but don't think it'll happen until the PS4.
I'm still not sure what your issue is with the proposed trade ideas
Yessir"Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
What do you mean?Red Sox: 2018 World Series Champions!!!
Patriots: 2018 Super Bowl Champions!!!
Team USA
Red Sox
Patriots
Celtics
BruinsComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
If your team needs a power hitter and you don't need a high average and have the budget you can get Granderson from the Yanks for like two B potentials or an A and two Cs. It payed off for me with SF he hit .320 with 35 hrs and 100+ RBIs.Comment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
I'm talking about virtual ratings. Some things happen in real life that don't and will never happen in game (i.e. drug/alcohol issues, public anxiety, etc.) and we worry about that. Like say if I ask for Zack Grenkie, we won't put into consideration his anxiety issues because that doesn't matter. I have been pulling for MLB the show to do that, but don't think it'll happen until the PS4.
EDIT: Also, comparing something that is tangible on the field like Morneau's durability...and anxiety issues/drug or alcohol abuse is very short sighted and ridiculousCheck out my Houston Astros Dynasties:
Holdin' Onto Hope- Completed
Holdin' Onto Hope Part 2: Cranes, Trains, and Auto-Explosions- CompletedComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
That's why we have this and the Arbitration thread though...its for us guys who want these things in the game but cannot get them due to the obvious reasons (MLBPA doesn't want it, and I don't blame them.) The whole purpose of this thread is so that we can take these things into consideration when making our deals
EDIT: Also, comparing something that is tangible on the field like Morneau's durability...and anxiety issues/drug or alcohol abuse is very short sighted and ridiculous
EDIT: any durability is nowhere near as serious as drug/alcohol abuse and anxiety. I was using them fom a non realistic POVRed Sox: 2018 World Series Champions!!!
Patriots: 2018 Super Bowl Champions!!!
Team USA
Red Sox
Patriots
Celtics
BruinsComment
-
I know that's why we have it and that's a reason I'm here. But I'm talking for people who don't use that kind of realism (msuboy11). Anyway, I'm done arguing about something as stupid as w e are. It's a waste of thread space since I agree anyway.
EDIT: any durability is nowhere near as serious as drug/alcohol abuse and anxiety. I was using them fom a non realistic POV
Sent via TapatalkComment
-
Comment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Depends on what other options I could use at 1B"Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Yea, because I understand. I used to be one of the most unrealistic people you could find! I once traded Miggy and Verlander for a couple Cs and Bs! That was way back in MLB 10 though. Now I take various thing into consideration when trading. Like the amount of money for contracts, player moral (let's not start another argument on that), and depth at that position. I'm still starting to learn to start putting things like the thing we were just arguing about into affect, but I should have it in no time.Red Sox: 2018 World Series Champions!!!
Patriots: 2018 Super Bowl Champions!!!
Team USA
Red Sox
Patriots
Celtics
BruinsComment
Comment