Great post Grondar!
Humm...why do some people make it their mission to persuade others to their point of view? That is an age old question. I think it is human nature to be defensive of our property. So when you buy MVP or ESPN you will defend it (unless you buy both, then you are unbiased, mostly). It's like family, no matter how stupid your bothers, sisters, wife, children, mother and father are, when it comes down to it, instinct says wether they are right or wrong, to defend them at all costs!
So the key is to be unbiased in these things and always give every game the benefit of the dought until you have tried it. Also, there is ususally good and bad in almost every game. MVP has many good points and many bad points too. ESPN (whenever I get to try it) will have good points and bad points.
Unfortunately, we don't all have enough $$$ to buy every game, so we rely on reviews. The only deal with reviews is you gotta read them closely and find out why a game is being given praise or being bashed...it might be on an issue you don't give a rats cranny about. Links 2004 on XBOX certainly took some hits (as a good example), simply because the commentary stunk and the framerate was a bit off. To me, I cared how the game played and if the commentary was wacky, so what. But for others, maybe that is important.
Comment