Biggio had the longevity but he was a worse career hitter (122 wRC+ vs 115 wRC+) and something like 8 WINS worse on defense. Rolen's the better guy for me too.
Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
I would put Rolen ahead of Biggio as well. Biggio was a fringe guy for me because he only got to 3000 hits because he played so long. And was never really feared as a hitter like Bonds, Mcgwire, Sosa, Bagwell, Griffey, Pujols, etc. Also did we already have the discussion on Edmonds? And what was the consensus for him?Comment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
I would put Rolen ahead of Biggio as well. Biggio was a fringe guy for me because he only got to 3000 hits because he played so long. And was never really feared as a hitter like Bonds, Mcgwire, Sosa, Bagwell, Griffey, Pujols, etc. Also did we already have the discussion on Edmonds? And what was the consensus for him?
I'd put him in. Career 132 wRC+ with some of the best CF defense ever. Just shy of 400 dingers."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
Ok I thought we had discussed earlier and I agree he was a 4 tool CF from what I remember. He could hit for both power and avg. was a great fielder and had a good arm. I just don't remember him being a speedster. And I agree should be in the HOF probably on a second or third ballot though definitely not a first ballot type of guy.Comment
-
Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
Comment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
Would have liked to have seen a greater peak from a guy with < 60 WAR, so I'll lean towards no.
He won an MVP, made 9 All-Star games, and was considered one of the premiere offensive forces in the league during his time, so I think he'll hang around on the ballot for awhile.I write things on the Internet.
Comment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
Would have liked to have seen a greater peak from a guy with < 60 WAR, so I'll lean towards no.
He won an MVP, made 9 All-Star games, and was considered one of the premiere offensive forces in the league during his time, so I think he'll hang around on the ballot for awhile.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
I think he gets in (and I would vote him in, too), but it may be a tough pill to swallow for folks who do the minimum 60 or 70 WAR is required thing before they'll even consider a guy. I was a bit surprised to see Vlad with only 54 fWAR or thereabouts, but it was because he's on the other end of the spectrum from Andruw Jones where the defense weighs him down. With Vlad's O and Andruw's D, I wonder how many WAR that would make..
Gross math don't read
Spoiler
excuse any errors i literally just woke up
Vladdy: 464.8 wRAA/2147G
Jones: 2196 G
Vladdy: 475.4 wRAA/2196G
Jones: 161.3 wRAA
=314.1 extra wRAA = 33.9 extra WAR
A 101 WAR player."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
I would put Rolen ahead of Biggio as well. Biggio was a fringe guy for me because he only got to 3000 hits because he played so long. And was never really feared as a hitter like Bonds, Mcgwire, Sosa, Bagwell, Griffey, Pujols, etc. Also did we already have the discussion on Edmonds? And what was the consensus for him?
The whole "feared as a hitter" criteria needs to go away.Originally posted by Jay BilasThe question isn't whether UConn belongs with the elites, but over the last 20 years, whether the rest of the college basketball elite belongs with UConnComment
-
Comment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
I get what you're saying but the intimidation and focus a player can elicit is real.
Regardless of what HOF voters think, Edgar was to be reckoned with; I don't have any data to support but I wonder what Junior's numbers would've been without Edgar. Not saying Junior wouldn't have been a top-tier HOF but Edgar was tremendous support.Originally posted by Gibson88Anyone who asked for an ETA is not being Master of their Domain.
It's hard though...especially when I got my neighbor playing their franchise across the street...maybe I will occupy myself with Glamore Magazine.Comment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
There have been studies done and they are not on the side of lineup protection.
Pitching around guys is dumb anyway tbh. A walk is a guaranteed on base. Putting it in the zone isn't always going to result in a bad outcome on good hitters, but a walk will. I've never really understood the appeal to pitching around good hitters. Unless of course you have Ryan Goins or Brendan Ryan behind him but that's obviously an absolute extreme.
I'm just going off the top of my head, I think the data says it exists but not significantly."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?
Yup, studies have basically debunked protection theory.
If anything, it probably works the other way. Griffrey hitting in front of Martinez and getting on base opens up a hole on the right side of the infield since the first baseman has to hold the runner. And some guys are awful pitching from the stretch.Last edited by Chip Douglass; 07-20-2015, 03:40 PM.I write things on the Internet.
Comment
Comment