Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AC
    Win the East
    • Sep 2010
    • 14951

    #1126
    Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

    Biggio had the longevity but he was a worse career hitter (122 wRC+ vs 115 wRC+) and something like 8 WINS worse on defense. Rolen's the better guy for me too.
    "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

    Comment

    • redsox4evur
      Hall Of Fame
      • Jul 2013
      • 18169

      #1127
      Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

      I would put Rolen ahead of Biggio as well. Biggio was a fringe guy for me because he only got to 3000 hits because he played so long. And was never really feared as a hitter like Bonds, Mcgwire, Sosa, Bagwell, Griffey, Pujols, etc. Also did we already have the discussion on Edmonds? And what was the consensus for him?
      Follow me on Twitter

      Comment

      • AC
        Win the East
        • Sep 2010
        • 14951

        #1128
        Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

        Originally posted by redsox4evur
        I would put Rolen ahead of Biggio as well. Biggio was a fringe guy for me because he only got to 3000 hits because he played so long. And was never really feared as a hitter like Bonds, Mcgwire, Sosa, Bagwell, Griffey, Pujols, etc. Also did we already have the discussion on Edmonds? And what was the consensus for him?
        I remember an Edmonds decision, yeah.

        I'd put him in. Career 132 wRC+ with some of the best CF defense ever. Just shy of 400 dingers.
        "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

        Comment

        • redsox4evur
          Hall Of Fame
          • Jul 2013
          • 18169

          #1129
          Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

          Originally posted by AC
          I remember an Edmonds decision, yeah.

          I'd put him in. Career 132 wRC+ with some of the best CF defense ever. Just shy of 400 dingers.
          Ok I thought we had discussed earlier and I agree he was a 4 tool CF from what I remember. He could hit for both power and avg. was a great fielder and had a good arm. I just don't remember him being a speedster. And I agree should be in the HOF probably on a second or third ballot though definitely not a first ballot type of guy.
          Follow me on Twitter

          Comment

          • WaitTilNextYear
            Go Cubs Go
            • Mar 2013
            • 16830

            #1130
            Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

            What about Vlad?

            http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx...78&position=OF
            Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

            Comment

            • redsox4evur
              Hall Of Fame
              • Jul 2013
              • 18169

              #1131
              Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

              Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
              Need to quote Rev Theory on this one, HELL YEAH!!!! Another 4 tool guy without the speed, from my memories. He had a great bat, the greatest arm I have seen in my life (just over 20 years). Actually he doesn't have an arm he has a cannon instead.
              Follow me on Twitter

              Comment

              • Chip Douglass
                Hall Of Fame
                • Dec 2005
                • 12256

                #1132
                Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

                Would have liked to have seen a greater peak from a guy with < 60 WAR, so I'll lean towards no.

                He won an MVP, made 9 All-Star games, and was considered one of the premiere offensive forces in the league during his time, so I think he'll hang around on the ballot for awhile.
                I write things on the Internet.

                Comment

                • WaitTilNextYear
                  Go Cubs Go
                  • Mar 2013
                  • 16830

                  #1133
                  Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

                  Originally posted by Chip Douglass
                  Would have liked to have seen a greater peak from a guy with < 60 WAR, so I'll lean towards no.

                  He won an MVP, made 9 All-Star games, and was considered one of the premiere offensive forces in the league during his time, so I think he'll hang around on the ballot for awhile.
                  I think he gets in (and I would vote him in, too), but it may be a tough pill to swallow for folks who do the minimum 60 or 70 WAR is required thing before they'll even consider a guy. I was a bit surprised to see Vlad with only 54 fWAR or thereabouts, but it was because he's on the other end of the spectrum from Andruw Jones where the defense weighs him down. With Vlad's O and Andruw's D, I wonder how many WAR that would make..
                  Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                  Comment

                  • AC
                    Win the East
                    • Sep 2010
                    • 14951

                    #1134
                    Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

                    Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                    I think he gets in (and I would vote him in, too), but it may be a tough pill to swallow for folks who do the minimum 60 or 70 WAR is required thing before they'll even consider a guy. I was a bit surprised to see Vlad with only 54 fWAR or thereabouts, but it was because he's on the other end of the spectrum from Andruw Jones where the defense weighs him down. With Vlad's O and Andruw's D, I wonder how many WAR that would make..
                    Jones with Vladdy's bat makes...

                    Gross math don't read
                    Spoiler


                    A 101 WAR player.
                    "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                    Comment

                    • NYJets
                      Hall Of Fame
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 18637

                      #1135
                      Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

                      Originally posted by redsox4evur
                      I would put Rolen ahead of Biggio as well. Biggio was a fringe guy for me because he only got to 3000 hits because he played so long. And was never really feared as a hitter like Bonds, Mcgwire, Sosa, Bagwell, Griffey, Pujols, etc. Also did we already have the discussion on Edmonds? And what was the consensus for him?

                      The whole "feared as a hitter" criteria needs to go away.
                      Originally posted by Jay Bilas
                      The question isn't whether UConn belongs with the elites, but over the last 20 years, whether the rest of the college basketball elite belongs with UConn

                      Comment

                      • redsox4evur
                        Hall Of Fame
                        • Jul 2013
                        • 18169

                        #1136
                        Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

                        Originally posted by NYJets
                        The whole "feared as a hitter" criteria needs to go away.
                        Why? <url>
                        Follow me on Twitter

                        Comment

                        • ubernoob
                          ****
                          • Jul 2004
                          • 15522

                          #1137
                          Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

                          Originally posted by redsox4evur
                          Why? <url>
                          Because it is both asinine and completely beside the point?
                          bad

                          Comment

                          • Speedy
                            #Ace
                            • Apr 2008
                            • 16143

                            #1138
                            Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

                            Originally posted by ubernoob
                            Because it is both asinine and completely beside the point?
                            I get what you're saying but the intimidation and focus a player can elicit is real.

                            Regardless of what HOF voters think, Edgar was to be reckoned with; I don't have any data to support but I wonder what Junior's numbers would've been without Edgar. Not saying Junior wouldn't have been a top-tier HOF but Edgar was tremendous support.
                            Originally posted by Gibson88
                            Anyone who asked for an ETA is not being Master of their Domain.
                            It's hard though...especially when I got my neighbor playing their franchise across the street...maybe I will occupy myself with Glamore Magazine.

                            Comment

                            • AC
                              Win the East
                              • Sep 2010
                              • 14951

                              #1139
                              Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

                              There have been studies done and they are not on the side of lineup protection.

                              Pitching around guys is dumb anyway tbh. A walk is a guaranteed on base. Putting it in the zone isn't always going to result in a bad outcome on good hitters, but a walk will. I've never really understood the appeal to pitching around good hitters. Unless of course you have Ryan Goins or Brendan Ryan behind him but that's obviously an absolute extreme.

                              I'm just going off the top of my head, I think the data says it exists but not significantly.
                              "Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric Byrnes

                              Comment

                              • Chip Douglass
                                Hall Of Fame
                                • Dec 2005
                                • 12256

                                #1140
                                Re: Hall Of Fame: Yes Or No?

                                Yup, studies have basically debunked protection theory.

                                If anything, it probably works the other way. Griffrey hitting in front of Martinez and getting on base opens up a hole on the right side of the infield since the first baseman has to hold the runner. And some guys are awful pitching from the stretch.
                                Last edited by Chip Douglass; 07-20-2015, 03:40 PM.
                                I write things on the Internet.

                                Comment

                                Working...