ESPN's Power Rankings

[GCrusher23]

Re: ESPN\'s Power Rankings

I'm really surprised the Blue Jays, Orioles, and Padres are so low.

[devilsjaw]

Re: ESPN\'s Power Rankings

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
GCrusher23 said:
I'm really surprised the Blue Jays, Orioles, and Padres are so low.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

The Orioles being rated low doesn't surprise me at all. The pitching staff is really young and in-experienced. They will have to outscore a lot of teams to suceed this year.

[devilsjaw]

Re: ESPN\'s Power Rankings

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
GCrusher23 said:
I'm really surprised the Blue Jays, Orioles, and Padres are so low.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

The Orioles being rated low doesn't surprise me at all. The pitching staff is really young and in-experienced. They will have to outscore a lot of teams to suceed this year.

[devilsjaw]

Re: ESPN\'s Power Rankings

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
GCrusher23 said:
I'm really surprised the Blue Jays, Orioles, and Padres are so low.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

The Orioles being rated low doesn't surprise me at all. The pitching staff is really young and in-experienced. They will have to outscore a lot of teams to suceed this year.

[MSUSPartanPride]

Re: ESPN\'s Power Rankings

OK, WTF.

All of NL West
23. Padres
24. Tigers

[MSUSPartanPride]

Re: ESPN\'s Power Rankings

OK, WTF.

All of NL West
23. Padres
24. Tigers

[MSUSPartanPride]

Re: ESPN\'s Power Rankings

OK, WTF.

All of NL West
23. Padres
24. Tigers

[Jwally]

Re: ESPN\'s Power Rankings

Wow, they have the Reds at 19th. That may be a little high since we don't have any proven starting pitching..but I'm keeping my hopes up some of these young prospects develop into some good pitchers.

[Jwally]

Re: ESPN\'s Power Rankings

Wow, they have the Reds at 19th. That may be a little high since we don't have any proven starting pitching..but I'm keeping my hopes up some of these young prospects develop into some good pitchers.

[Jwally]

Re: ESPN\'s Power Rankings

Wow, they have the Reds at 19th. That may be a little high since we don't have any proven starting pitching..but I'm keeping my hopes up some of these young prospects develop into some good pitchers.

[BatsareBugs]

Re: ESPN\'s Power Rankings

Does it really matter if the Padres got Maddux instead of Wells, they both put up similar stats last year. And why are they behind the Rockies and the Dodgers...

Whatever.

[BatsareBugs]

Re: ESPN\'s Power Rankings

Does it really matter if the Padres got Maddux instead of Wells, they both put up similar stats last year. And why are they behind the Rockies and the Dodgers...

Whatever.

[BatsareBugs]

Re: ESPN\'s Power Rankings

Does it really matter if the Padres got Maddux instead of Wells, they both put up similar stats last year. And why are they behind the Rockies and the Dodgers...

Whatever.

[GCrusher23]

Re: ESPN\'s Power Rankings

The true Top 10 Power Rankings:

1. New York
2. Boston
3. Philadelphia
4. Chicago Cubs
5. Seattle
6. Houston
7. Anaheim
8. Oakland
9. San Diego
10. Arizona

[GCrusher23]

Re: ESPN\'s Power Rankings

The true Top 10 Power Rankings:

1. New York
2. Boston
3. Philadelphia
4. Chicago Cubs
5. Seattle
6. Houston
7. Anaheim
8. Oakland
9. San Diego
10. Arizona