ESPN's Power Rankings

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Misfit
    All Star
    • Mar 2003
    • 5766

    #61
    Re: ESPN\'s Power Rankings

    Seatle is getting old. Freddy Garcia has under-achieved for the last two years giving us no reason to say he will pitch as good as he did in 01. I think Aurilia will be a bust in Seatle and Spiezio isn't very good. I like their bullpen and the starting rotation is adequate. I'd put Toronto over them right now because Toronto has stellar offense and enough pitching to complement it. Lily pitched very well down the stretch last year and I think he'll be okay in Toronto. Batista had a great year last year and has looked just as good in the spring. And Hallday is one of the top pitchers in the game, for some reason a lot of people tend to overlook him when that discussion arises. If they can find someone to close out games they'll be very good. Meanwhile, Seatle's rotation is slightly above average and their offense is average at best with absolutely no power in it. Oakland has won the division two years in a row with mediocre offense so what reason do we have to say they can't do it again?

    Comment

    • 49ersrule23
      Banned
      • Apr 2003
      • 647

      #62
      Re: ESPN\'s Power Rankings

      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
      Clay_OS said:
      First of the season...

      Linkage

      Guess who's not in the Bottom 5!?!?!?

      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

      Giants are 13th and 12th in both polls which are good numbers.

      No complaints here.

      Comment

      • 49ersrule23
        Banned
        • Apr 2003
        • 647

        #63
        Re: ESPN\'s Power Rankings

        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
        Clay_OS said:
        First of the season...

        Linkage

        Guess who's not in the Bottom 5!?!?!?

        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

        Giants are 13th and 12th in both polls which are good numbers.

        No complaints here.

        Comment

        • 49ersrule23
          Banned
          • Apr 2003
          • 647

          #64
          Re: ESPN\'s Power Rankings

          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
          Clay_OS said:
          First of the season...

          Linkage

          Guess who's not in the Bottom 5!?!?!?

          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

          Giants are 13th and 12th in both polls which are good numbers.

          No complaints here.

          Comment

          • GCrusher23
            MVP
            • Dec 2002
            • 1170

            #65
            Re: ESPN\'s Power Rankings

            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
            Misfit said:
            Seatle is getting old. Freddy Garcia has under-achieved for the last two years giving us no reason to say he will pitch as good as he did in 01. I think Aurilia will be a bust in Seatle and Spiezio isn't very good. I like their bullpen and the starting rotation is adequate. I'd put Toronto over them right now because Toronto has stellar offense and enough pitching to complement it. Lily pitched very well down the stretch last year and I think he'll be okay in Toronto. Batista had a great year last year and has looked just as good in the spring. And Hallday is one of the top pitchers in the game, for some reason a lot of people tend to overlook him when that discussion arises. If they can find someone to close out games they'll be very good. Meanwhile, Seatle's rotation is slightly above average and their offense is average at best with absolutely no power in it. Oakland has won the division two years in a row with mediocre offense so what reason do we have to say they can't do it again?

            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

            Seattle's rotation: Moyer, Pineiro, Garcia, Meche, Franklin
            Oakland's rotation: Hudson, Zito, Mulder, Redman, Harden
            Anaheim's rotation: Washburn, Colon, Escobar, Lackey, Ortiz
            Toronto's rotation: Halladay, Batista, Hentgen, Lilly, Towers

            Rotation average Quality Starts in 2003

            Seattle: 18.8
            Oakland: 19.6
            Anaheim: 16.4
            Toronto: 15.2

            These numbers include a projected full 2003 year for Josh Towers and Rich Harden.


            Rotation average WHIP in 2003

            Seattle: 1.28
            Oakland: 1.19
            Anaheim: 1.37
            Toronto: 1.23

            Freddy Garcia had severe ear aches last year that hindered his balance on the mound. He said he has been pitching without any ear problems this spring, so I expect him to pitch similar to the first half of 2002. You then put Rafael Soriano and Hasegawa in before Guardado, and that's one deadly pitching staff up in the Pacific Northwest.

            Comment

            • GCrusher23
              MVP
              • Dec 2002
              • 1170

              #66
              Re: ESPN\'s Power Rankings

              </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
              Misfit said:
              Seatle is getting old. Freddy Garcia has under-achieved for the last two years giving us no reason to say he will pitch as good as he did in 01. I think Aurilia will be a bust in Seatle and Spiezio isn't very good. I like their bullpen and the starting rotation is adequate. I'd put Toronto over them right now because Toronto has stellar offense and enough pitching to complement it. Lily pitched very well down the stretch last year and I think he'll be okay in Toronto. Batista had a great year last year and has looked just as good in the spring. And Hallday is one of the top pitchers in the game, for some reason a lot of people tend to overlook him when that discussion arises. If they can find someone to close out games they'll be very good. Meanwhile, Seatle's rotation is slightly above average and their offense is average at best with absolutely no power in it. Oakland has won the division two years in a row with mediocre offense so what reason do we have to say they can't do it again?

              <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

              Seattle's rotation: Moyer, Pineiro, Garcia, Meche, Franklin
              Oakland's rotation: Hudson, Zito, Mulder, Redman, Harden
              Anaheim's rotation: Washburn, Colon, Escobar, Lackey, Ortiz
              Toronto's rotation: Halladay, Batista, Hentgen, Lilly, Towers

              Rotation average Quality Starts in 2003

              Seattle: 18.8
              Oakland: 19.6
              Anaheim: 16.4
              Toronto: 15.2

              These numbers include a projected full 2003 year for Josh Towers and Rich Harden.


              Rotation average WHIP in 2003

              Seattle: 1.28
              Oakland: 1.19
              Anaheim: 1.37
              Toronto: 1.23

              Freddy Garcia had severe ear aches last year that hindered his balance on the mound. He said he has been pitching without any ear problems this spring, so I expect him to pitch similar to the first half of 2002. You then put Rafael Soriano and Hasegawa in before Guardado, and that's one deadly pitching staff up in the Pacific Northwest.

              Comment

              • GCrusher23
                MVP
                • Dec 2002
                • 1170

                #67
                Re: ESPN\'s Power Rankings

                </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                Misfit said:
                Seatle is getting old. Freddy Garcia has under-achieved for the last two years giving us no reason to say he will pitch as good as he did in 01. I think Aurilia will be a bust in Seatle and Spiezio isn't very good. I like their bullpen and the starting rotation is adequate. I'd put Toronto over them right now because Toronto has stellar offense and enough pitching to complement it. Lily pitched very well down the stretch last year and I think he'll be okay in Toronto. Batista had a great year last year and has looked just as good in the spring. And Hallday is one of the top pitchers in the game, for some reason a lot of people tend to overlook him when that discussion arises. If they can find someone to close out games they'll be very good. Meanwhile, Seatle's rotation is slightly above average and their offense is average at best with absolutely no power in it. Oakland has won the division two years in a row with mediocre offense so what reason do we have to say they can't do it again?

                <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                Seattle's rotation: Moyer, Pineiro, Garcia, Meche, Franklin
                Oakland's rotation: Hudson, Zito, Mulder, Redman, Harden
                Anaheim's rotation: Washburn, Colon, Escobar, Lackey, Ortiz
                Toronto's rotation: Halladay, Batista, Hentgen, Lilly, Towers

                Rotation average Quality Starts in 2003

                Seattle: 18.8
                Oakland: 19.6
                Anaheim: 16.4
                Toronto: 15.2

                These numbers include a projected full 2003 year for Josh Towers and Rich Harden.


                Rotation average WHIP in 2003

                Seattle: 1.28
                Oakland: 1.19
                Anaheim: 1.37
                Toronto: 1.23

                Freddy Garcia had severe ear aches last year that hindered his balance on the mound. He said he has been pitching without any ear problems this spring, so I expect him to pitch similar to the first half of 2002. You then put Rafael Soriano and Hasegawa in before Guardado, and that's one deadly pitching staff up in the Pacific Northwest.

                Comment

                • SubZ
                  MVP
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 1056

                  #68
                  Re: ESPN\'s Power Rankings

                  "#30...Rangers...
                  It's gonna be a loooong year."

                  No it isn't because I have already thrown in the towel after the past two horrible years of team management. Bring on Football season!

                  Comment

                  • SubZ
                    MVP
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 1056

                    #69
                    Re: ESPN\'s Power Rankings

                    "#30...Rangers...
                    It's gonna be a loooong year."

                    No it isn't because I have already thrown in the towel after the past two horrible years of team management. Bring on Football season!

                    Comment

                    • SubZ
                      MVP
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 1056

                      #70
                      Re: ESPN\'s Power Rankings

                      "#30...Rangers...
                      It's gonna be a loooong year."

                      No it isn't because I have already thrown in the towel after the past two horrible years of team management. Bring on Football season!

                      Comment

                      Working...