9/6 - 9/18 Game Discussion Thread
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
-
Re: 9/6 - 9/18 Game Discussion Thread
I would definitely take Montgomery over hammel.Wolverines Packers Cubs Celtics
Comment
-
Re: 9/6 - 9/18 Game Discussion Thread
The 1996 Tigers had 5 guys hit 20+ homers.Last edited by TripleCrown9; 09-07-2016, 03:32 PM.Boston Red Sox
1903 1912 1915 1916 1918 2004 2007 2013 2018
9 4 1 8 27 6 14 45 26 34
Comment
-
Re: 9/6 - 9/18 Game Discussion Thread
No shame losing to Cleveland, though the way they lost was heartbreaking. But ever since then,it's been a roller coaster of emotions.
Losing series to Angels
Rebounding by sweeping the Twins
Things looking up when taking 2/3 from O's
Losing 2/3 to Rays
On verge of getting swept by YankeesComment
-
Re: 9/6 - 9/18 Game Discussion Thread
If the Cubs feel that Hammel would be decent working in relief, he might make it. I'm not sure we have any evidence of him in a RP role. Maybe more importantly than that, Hammel is the one guy on the staff that, when he's not on, blows up spectacularly. I'm not sure we want a guy who has a history of completely losing it from time to time to be given a role and an opportunity to cost us a game somewhere.
The Cubs may also take an extra position player. 11 pitchers on hand seems to be plenty for a short series and Maddon might want an extra situational guy on the bench. Or he might want to take, like, 6 catchers.
All of this is contingent on injuries and performance down the stretch, too.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: 9/6 - 9/18 Game Discussion Thread
I probably take Smith and Montgomery over Pena and Hammel. Smith has been solid after going on the shelf with an injury earlier. He gives a funky look and has a lot of experience setting up. Montgomery has been ok lately. Not sure about Cahill.
If the Cubs feel that Hammel would be decent working in relief, he might make it. I'm not sure we have any evidence of him in a RP role. Maybe more importantly than that, Hammel is the one guy on the staff that, when he's not on, blows up spectacularly. I'm not sure we want a guy who has a history of completely losing it from time to time to be given a role and an opportunity to cost us a game somewhere.
The Cubs may also take an extra position player. 11 pitchers on hand seems to be plenty for a short series and Maddon might want an extra situational guy on the bench. Or he might want to take, like, 6 catchers.
All of this is contingent on injuries and performance down the stretch, too.Comment
-
Re: 9/6 - 9/18 Game Discussion Thread
Severino throwing gasss
Sent from my HTCD200LVWPP using TapatalkComment
-
Re: 9/6 - 9/18 Game Discussion Thread
Sweeeeeeppppp! Biggest game of the year for the Yankees.
Sent from my HTCD200LVWPP using TapatalkLast edited by DamnYanks2; 09-07-2016, 09:11 PM.Comment
-
-
Re: 9/6 - 9/18 Game Discussion Thread
Villar -2
Cubs -1
Cubs having some problems getting a certain Brewer out.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: 9/6 - 9/18 Game Discussion Thread
Sole possession of 1st place!Boston Red Sox
1903 1912 1915 1916 1918 2004 2007 2013 2018
9 4 1 8 27 6 14 45 26 34
Comment
-
Re: 9/6 - 9/18 Game Discussion Thread
Guy is slugging .767 in the 2nd half; last guy I remember suddenly lighting it up with HRs as a 2B was Brett Boone.Originally posted by Gibson88Anyone who asked for an ETA is not being Master of their Domain.
It's hard though...especially when I got my neighbor playing their franchise across the street...maybe I will occupy myself with Glamore Magazine.Comment
Comment