Why are steroids so bad?

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • glucklich
    Banned
    • Jun 2004
    • 4272

    #151
    Re: Why are steroids so bad?

    Originally posted by MSRoble33
    But never ONCE is it "enhancing"...
    See post 66.

    Comment

    • MSRoble33
      MVP
      • Aug 2002
      • 1840

      #152
      Re: Why are steroids so bad?

      Originally posted by glucklich
      See post 66.
      VERY weak argument... and a narrow-minded way to view meds such as cortizone.

      Comment

      • MSRoble33
        MVP
        • Aug 2002
        • 1840

        #153
        Re: Why are steroids so bad?

        Originally posted by glucklich
        See post 66.
        VERY weak argument... and a narrow-minded way to view meds such as cortizone.

        Comment

        • glucklich
          Banned
          • Jun 2004
          • 4272

          #154
          Re: Why are steroids so bad?

          Originally posted by MSRoble33
          VERY weak argument... and a narrow-minded way to view meds such as cortizone.

          So you say.

          Comment

          • glucklich
            Banned
            • Jun 2004
            • 4272

            #155
            Re: Why are steroids so bad?

            Originally posted by MSRoble33
            VERY weak argument... and a narrow-minded way to view meds such as cortizone.

            So you say.

            Comment

            • MSRoble33
              MVP
              • Aug 2002
              • 1840

              #156
              Re: Why are steroids so bad?

              Have you even PLAYED sports in an organized level?

              Comment

              • MSRoble33
                MVP
                • Aug 2002
                • 1840

                #157
                Re: Why are steroids so bad?

                Have you even PLAYED sports in an organized level?

                Comment

                • jujuhound
                  MVP
                  • Oct 2002
                  • 1040

                  #158
                  Re: Why are steroids so bad?

                  Originally posted by glucklich
                  Point 4 is not entirely accurate and to some degree point two. I dont think harm is irrelevant. My thing is that if you oppose steroids then it makes sense that you would also oppose cortisone since it has bad long term effects.
                  Point 4 was completely a joke.

                  The difference between cortisone and steroids is that cortisone can be beneficial if used sparingly as it is intended as a legitimate medical treatment. Steroids, when used in the context of athletics, are inherently meant to be abused. You don't take 2 or 3 steroids shots over your lifetime if you want to see any effect. You do cycles of constant steroid use which have terrible effects.

                  On the other hand, my late grandfather had such chronic problems with his hip that he was given a cortisone shot to ease the pain and remove some of the calcium deposits (or whatever was in there). He did not suffer the degenerative effects of cortisone that you are talking about b/c he didn't shoot cortisone into his hip every day. The people that shot Butkus up every day were abusing cortisone. I don't know that there is any way to use steroids without abusing them.

                  By the way, I'm not sure of this, but I don't think they knew the negative effects of using cortisone too often back when Butkus played.

                  Comment

                  • jujuhound
                    MVP
                    • Oct 2002
                    • 1040

                    #159
                    Re: Why are steroids so bad?

                    Originally posted by glucklich
                    Point 4 is not entirely accurate and to some degree point two. I dont think harm is irrelevant. My thing is that if you oppose steroids then it makes sense that you would also oppose cortisone since it has bad long term effects.
                    Point 4 was completely a joke.

                    The difference between cortisone and steroids is that cortisone can be beneficial if used sparingly as it is intended as a legitimate medical treatment. Steroids, when used in the context of athletics, are inherently meant to be abused. You don't take 2 or 3 steroids shots over your lifetime if you want to see any effect. You do cycles of constant steroid use which have terrible effects.

                    On the other hand, my late grandfather had such chronic problems with his hip that he was given a cortisone shot to ease the pain and remove some of the calcium deposits (or whatever was in there). He did not suffer the degenerative effects of cortisone that you are talking about b/c he didn't shoot cortisone into his hip every day. The people that shot Butkus up every day were abusing cortisone. I don't know that there is any way to use steroids without abusing them.

                    By the way, I'm not sure of this, but I don't think they knew the negative effects of using cortisone too often back when Butkus played.

                    Comment

                    • glucklich
                      Banned
                      • Jun 2004
                      • 4272

                      #160
                      Re: Why are steroids so bad?

                      Originally posted by MSRoble33
                      Have you even PLAYED sports in an organized level?
                      Yes, I have. And Ive also had injuries which required me to have morphine injections.

                      Comment

                      • glucklich
                        Banned
                        • Jun 2004
                        • 4272

                        #161
                        Re: Why are steroids so bad?

                        Originally posted by MSRoble33
                        Have you even PLAYED sports in an organized level?
                        Yes, I have. And Ive also had injuries which required me to have morphine injections.

                        Comment

                        • glucklich
                          Banned
                          • Jun 2004
                          • 4272

                          #162
                          Re: Why are steroids so bad?

                          Originally posted by jujuhound
                          Point 4 was completely a joke.

                          The difference between cortisone and steroids is that cortisone can be beneficial if used sparingly as it is intended as a legitimate medical treatment. Steroids, when used in the context of athletics, are inherently meant to be abused. You don't take 2 or 3 steroids shots over your lifetime if you want to see any effect. You do cycles of constant steroid use which have terrible effects.

                          On the other hand, my late grandfather had such chronic problems with his hip that he was given a cortisone shot to ease the pain and remove some of the calcium deposits (or whatever was in there). He did not suffer the degenerative effects of cortisone that you are talking about b/c he didn't shoot cortisone into his hip every day. The people that shot Butkus up every day were abusing cortisone. I don't know that there is any way to use steroids without abusing them.

                          By the way, I'm not sure of this, but I don't think they knew the negative effects of using cortisone too often back when Butkus played.
                          Its a little different when you are a professional athlete and money enters the equation. Sometimes they take them for sustained periods of time because of the pressures to play.

                          Steroids have medicinal purposes do they not? I think they are used for ailing backs a lot.

                          Comment

                          • glucklich
                            Banned
                            • Jun 2004
                            • 4272

                            #163
                            Re: Why are steroids so bad?

                            Originally posted by jujuhound
                            Point 4 was completely a joke.

                            The difference between cortisone and steroids is that cortisone can be beneficial if used sparingly as it is intended as a legitimate medical treatment. Steroids, when used in the context of athletics, are inherently meant to be abused. You don't take 2 or 3 steroids shots over your lifetime if you want to see any effect. You do cycles of constant steroid use which have terrible effects.

                            On the other hand, my late grandfather had such chronic problems with his hip that he was given a cortisone shot to ease the pain and remove some of the calcium deposits (or whatever was in there). He did not suffer the degenerative effects of cortisone that you are talking about b/c he didn't shoot cortisone into his hip every day. The people that shot Butkus up every day were abusing cortisone. I don't know that there is any way to use steroids without abusing them.

                            By the way, I'm not sure of this, but I don't think they knew the negative effects of using cortisone too often back when Butkus played.
                            Its a little different when you are a professional athlete and money enters the equation. Sometimes they take them for sustained periods of time because of the pressures to play.

                            Steroids have medicinal purposes do they not? I think they are used for ailing backs a lot.

                            Comment

                            • jujuhound
                              MVP
                              • Oct 2002
                              • 1040

                              #164
                              Re: Why are steroids so bad?

                              Originally posted by glucklich
                              Steroids have medicinal purposes do they not? I think they are used for ailing backs a lot.
                              Yes, they do. I believe they are a different kind though. I think there are quite a few different kinds of steroids and we are talking about a different kind than what these athletes are injecting into themselves. We need a doctor or someone with medical knowledge. I know I had to take an inhaled steroid for a time that helped with asthma.

                              Comment

                              • jujuhound
                                MVP
                                • Oct 2002
                                • 1040

                                #165
                                Re: Why are steroids so bad?

                                Originally posted by glucklich
                                Steroids have medicinal purposes do they not? I think they are used for ailing backs a lot.
                                Yes, they do. I believe they are a different kind though. I think there are quite a few different kinds of steroids and we are talking about a different kind than what these athletes are injecting into themselves. We need a doctor or someone with medical knowledge. I know I had to take an inhaled steroid for a time that helped with asthma.

                                Comment

                                Working...