Why are steroids so bad?

[glucklich]

Re: Why are steroids so bad?

lol. You're going to get a copy/paste of his previously stated views on illegality that have already had more holes punched in them than Swiss cheese, followed by an admonition to read his posts next time.

Holes punched in them? By whom? I guess its because you say so. LOL, whatever that means. Youre just posturing at this point and its fairly obvious.

[glucklich]

Re: Why are steroids so bad?

lol. You're going to get a copy/paste of his previously stated views on illegality that have already had more holes punched in them than Swiss cheese, followed by an admonition to read his posts next time.

Holes punched in them? By whom? I guess its because you say so. LOL, whatever that means. Youre just posturing at this point and its fairly obvious.

[MSRoble33]

Re: Why are steroids so bad?

lol. You're going to get a copy/paste of his previously stated views on illegality that have already had more holes punched in them than Swiss cheese, followed by an admonition to read his posts next time.

I know... lol

Which should make it obvious to him that his argument is weak at best.

[MSRoble33]

Re: Why are steroids so bad?

lol. You're going to get a copy/paste of his previously stated views on illegality that have already had more holes punched in them than Swiss cheese, followed by an admonition to read his posts next time.

I know... lol

Which should make it obvious to him that his argument is weak at best.

[MSRoble33]

Re: Why are steroids so bad?

Holes punched in them? By whom? I guess its because you say so. LOL, whatever that means. Youre just posturing at this point and its fairly obvious.

The problem with your argument is that when someone gives a logic rebuttal AGAINST it, you send out the same thing all over again, just reworded or else you use a different example that's not all that much different (if at all different) from your previous example. Hence makes your arguments seem pretty weak.

There's MANY reasons to say steroids are bad... there's a few reasons to "not care", there's NO reasons to say it's good.

[MSRoble33]

Re: Why are steroids so bad?

Holes punched in them? By whom? I guess its because you say so. LOL, whatever that means. Youre just posturing at this point and its fairly obvious.

The problem with your argument is that when someone gives a logic rebuttal AGAINST it, you send out the same thing all over again, just reworded or else you use a different example that's not all that much different (if at all different) from your previous example. Hence makes your arguments seem pretty weak.

There's MANY reasons to say steroids are bad... there's a few reasons to "not care", there's NO reasons to say it's good.

[jujuhound]

Re: Why are steroids so bad?

The problem with your argument is that when someone gives a logic rebuttal AGAINST it, you send out the same thing all over again, just reworded or else you use a different example that's not all that much different (if at all different) from your previous example. Hence makes your arguments seem pretty weak.

There's MANY reasons to say steroids are bad... there's a few reasons to "not care", there's NO reasons to say it's good.

But only his posts are new are compelling...lol

[jujuhound]

Re: Why are steroids so bad?

The problem with your argument is that when someone gives a logic rebuttal AGAINST it, you send out the same thing all over again, just reworded or else you use a different example that's not all that much different (if at all different) from your previous example. Hence makes your arguments seem pretty weak.

There's MANY reasons to say steroids are bad... there's a few reasons to "not care", there's NO reasons to say it's good.

But only his posts are new are compelling...lol

[glucklich]

Re: Why are steroids so bad?

I know... lol

Which should make it obvious to him that his argument is weak at best.

No, it makes it obvious you have nothing new or insightful to offer. I told jujuhound a while ago that I didnt want to have the same conversation over and over again. He has said nothing that CWood hasnt already said when he and I already had this discussion but I guess jujuhound thinks hes superior to CWood- that CWood didnt say it right or as well as he could. But the fact is CWood already hit on the points Ive seen from jujuhound yet jujuhound keeps reinventing the wheel and thinks hes accomplished something.

[glucklich]

Re: Why are steroids so bad?

I know... lol

Which should make it obvious to him that his argument is weak at best.

No, it makes it obvious you have nothing new or insightful to offer. I told jujuhound a while ago that I didnt want to have the same conversation over and over again. He has said nothing that CWood hasnt already said when he and I already had this discussion but I guess jujuhound thinks hes superior to CWood- that CWood didnt say it right or as well as he could. But the fact is CWood already hit on the points Ive seen from jujuhound yet jujuhound keeps reinventing the wheel and thinks hes accomplished something.

[MSRoble33]

Re: Why are steroids so bad?

But only his posts are new are compelling...lol

LOL.. for real!!

It's almost like, "I KNOW YOU ARE...BUT WHAT AM I?"

[MSRoble33]

Re: Why are steroids so bad?

But only his posts are new are compelling...lol

LOL.. for real!!

It's almost like, "I KNOW YOU ARE...BUT WHAT AM I?"

[glucklich]

Re: Why are steroids so bad?

LOL.. for real!!

It's almost like, "I KNOW YOU ARE...BUT WHAT AM I?"

See post 58.

[glucklich]

Re: Why are steroids so bad?

LOL.. for real!!

It's almost like, "I KNOW YOU ARE...BUT WHAT AM I?"

See post 58.

[jujuhound]

Re: Why are steroids so bad?

Holes punched in them? By whom?

I'll take a page out of your book, but at least it will make more sense considering that you have never responded to this argument.

"The part where I think you are wrong is that the government has been enforcing the law, maybe just not as strictly as you would like. Like other drugs, the government tries to go after the suppliers and the dealers moreso than the end users - in this case the athletes. Most of the steroid drug busts, you have never heard about and never will. The dealers and suppliers are not the guys in the limelight that you would have heard of and who make the news. Ineffective enforcement does not equal no enforcement. The war against all drugs including steroids has been a losing one and not always dealt with by the government in the most effective manner."

I guess its because you say so. LOL, whatever that means. Youre just posturing at this point and its fairly obvious

All of your arguments are "because you say so." You have provided poor logic, at best, and then not bothered to clarify or expand when called on it. You started a whole new thread that you had to know would cause disagreement and argument, yet you refuse (or more likely are unable) to bring any counterarguments. You are above responding, I guess. Your pompous way of ignoring others arguments only makes your lack of a valid argument all the more transparent.