Live 2004 is plain ugly ......

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • trex3302
    Rookie
    • Aug 2003
    • 181

    #181
    Re: Live 2004 is plain ugly ......

    The graphics don't really matter from most decent camera angles. Why put EA out of business if they still make a good product. ESPN will likely be good, but so will Live. Live was fun to play last year even with all it's problems. That's all that really matters to most people. If ESPN is fun, people will buy it and play it. Nobody's head is in the sand because they like a game. Your head is more likely in the sand for making a post like that. You waste more time hating on things you don't know about than enjoying the game you bought. You probably miss out on a lot of good things in life that way. Good graphics will make a lot of people miss a lot of good games. Graphics aren't the only thing in a game. If they were, you wouldn't see so many people on these boards saying don't judge games til you play them. Live may be uglier than ESPN/ID and every other game, but that does not mean it will be inferior.

    Get over it. Play good games and fun games. If you can't live without players looking exactly like real life, I suggest you save $50 and get league pass or buy a ticket to a real game. Best graphics you will ever see.

    If you want to have fun with a game, give the games a chance and see what is actually fun and realistic. Not just what excites you visually. Graphics matter, but this isn't a Playboy game. Not much to look at in the NBA from my perspective. Learn to enjoy a game after you play it, not just looking at pretty pictures.

    Comment

    • TreyFury97
      Rookie
      • Sep 2002
      • 424

      #182
      Re: Live 2004 is plain ugly ......

      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
      trex3302 said:
      The graphics don't really matter from most decent camera angles. Why put EA out of business if they still make a good product. ESPN will likely be good, but so will Live. Live was fun to play last year even with all it's problems. That's all that really matters to most people. If ESPN is fun, people will buy it and play it. Nobody's head is in the sand because they like a game. Your head is more likely in the sand for making a post like that. You waste more time hating on things you don't know about than enjoying the game you bought. You probably miss out on a lot of good things in life that way. Good graphics will make a lot of people miss a lot of good games. Graphics aren't the only thing in a game. If they were, you wouldn't see so many people on these boards saying don't judge games til you play them. Live may be uglier than ESPN/ID and every other game, but that does not mean it will be inferior.

      Get over it. Play good games and fun games. If you can't live without players looking exactly like real life, I suggest you save $50 and get league pass or buy a ticket to a real game. Best graphics you will ever see.

      If you want to have fun with a game, give the games a chance and see what is actually fun and realistic. Not just what excites you visually. Graphics matter, but this isn't a Playboy game. Not much to look at in the NBA from my perspective. Learn to enjoy a game after you play it, not just looking at pretty pictures.

      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

      Amen to that

      Trey
      Trey's Teams to Watch:

      UCLA Bruins B-Ball
      American Eagles B-Ball
      LA Lakers
      Arsenal Gunners

      Comment

      • TreyFury97
        Rookie
        • Sep 2002
        • 424

        #183
        Re: Live 2004 is plain ugly ......

        </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
        trex3302 said:
        The graphics don't really matter from most decent camera angles. Why put EA out of business if they still make a good product. ESPN will likely be good, but so will Live. Live was fun to play last year even with all it's problems. That's all that really matters to most people. If ESPN is fun, people will buy it and play it. Nobody's head is in the sand because they like a game. Your head is more likely in the sand for making a post like that. You waste more time hating on things you don't know about than enjoying the game you bought. You probably miss out on a lot of good things in life that way. Good graphics will make a lot of people miss a lot of good games. Graphics aren't the only thing in a game. If they were, you wouldn't see so many people on these boards saying don't judge games til you play them. Live may be uglier than ESPN/ID and every other game, but that does not mean it will be inferior.

        Get over it. Play good games and fun games. If you can't live without players looking exactly like real life, I suggest you save $50 and get league pass or buy a ticket to a real game. Best graphics you will ever see.

        If you want to have fun with a game, give the games a chance and see what is actually fun and realistic. Not just what excites you visually. Graphics matter, but this isn't a Playboy game. Not much to look at in the NBA from my perspective. Learn to enjoy a game after you play it, not just looking at pretty pictures.

        <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

        Amen to that

        Trey
        Trey's Teams to Watch:

        UCLA Bruins B-Ball
        American Eagles B-Ball
        LA Lakers
        Arsenal Gunners

        Comment

        • TreyFury97
          Rookie
          • Sep 2002
          • 424

          #184
          Re: Live 2004 is plain ugly ......

          </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
          trex3302 said:
          The graphics don't really matter from most decent camera angles. Why put EA out of business if they still make a good product. ESPN will likely be good, but so will Live. Live was fun to play last year even with all it's problems. That's all that really matters to most people. If ESPN is fun, people will buy it and play it. Nobody's head is in the sand because they like a game. Your head is more likely in the sand for making a post like that. You waste more time hating on things you don't know about than enjoying the game you bought. You probably miss out on a lot of good things in life that way. Good graphics will make a lot of people miss a lot of good games. Graphics aren't the only thing in a game. If they were, you wouldn't see so many people on these boards saying don't judge games til you play them. Live may be uglier than ESPN/ID and every other game, but that does not mean it will be inferior.

          Get over it. Play good games and fun games. If you can't live without players looking exactly like real life, I suggest you save $50 and get league pass or buy a ticket to a real game. Best graphics you will ever see.

          If you want to have fun with a game, give the games a chance and see what is actually fun and realistic. Not just what excites you visually. Graphics matter, but this isn't a Playboy game. Not much to look at in the NBA from my perspective. Learn to enjoy a game after you play it, not just looking at pretty pictures.

          <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

          Amen to that

          Trey
          Trey's Teams to Watch:

          UCLA Bruins B-Ball
          American Eagles B-Ball
          LA Lakers
          Arsenal Gunners

          Comment

          Working...