2k LOOKS realistic BUT Live(after live 04) FEELS Realistic.
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: 2k LOOKS realistic BUT Live(after live 04) FEELS Realistic.
Originally posted by JOEdellisAny white boy who thinks he knows my struggle
Cause he listens to Pac and his adrenaline doubles
Now I ain't got problems with you being yourself
But when you front and use the N word, it just don't help
I might not trip, and your friends'll laugh at you
But I know some real ****** that'll straight up slap you
Now you could be down, but let's act growed up
Cause we ain't the same color when police show up
-Murs -
Re: 2k LOOKS realistic BUT Live(after live 04) FEELS Realistic.
Originally posted by JOEdellis2K defined perfectly, specially the LOOKED part. VC should focus on animation for their 2k series, it still looks sort of sluggish compared to Live's more fluid animation. it looks good do, but looks are not everything...SPECIALLY in gaming.Any white boy who thinks he knows my struggle
Cause he listens to Pac and his adrenaline doubles
Now I ain't got problems with you being yourself
But when you front and use the N word, it just don't help
I might not trip, and your friends'll laugh at you
But I know some real ****** that'll straight up slap you
Now you could be down, but let's act growed up
Cause we ain't the same color when police show up
-MursComment
-
Re: 2k LOOKS realistic BUT Live(after live 04) FEELS Realistic.
Originally posted by nba_ballerYou are so biased it's not even funny. THere's no way you can say that the 2k animations aren't fluid.Comment
-
Re: 2k LOOKS realistic BUT Live(after live 04) FEELS Realistic.
Originally posted by nba_ballerYou are so biased it's not even funny. THere's no way you can say that the 2k animations aren't fluid.Comment
-
Re: 2k LOOKS realistic BUT Live(after live 04) FEELS Realistic.
Originally posted by truballer4lifeLive plays more realistic in my opinion. Last year 2k4 felt wierd the isomotion moves were weak and i hate the isomotion defense and the shooting is ugly in last years and this year but i like th running shot they added and they need to fix the dunking period, someone with an eighty should do the some dunks as someone with a ninety.Comment
-
Re: 2k LOOKS realistic BUT Live(after live 04) FEELS Realistic.
Originally posted by truballer4lifeLive plays more realistic in my opinion. Last year 2k4 felt wierd the isomotion moves were weak and i hate the isomotion defense and the shooting is ugly in last years and this year but i like th running shot they added and they need to fix the dunking period, someone with an eighty should do the some dunks as someone with a ninety.Comment
-
Re: 2k LOOKS realistic BUT Live(after live 04) FEELS Realistic.
Originally posted by JOEdellis1 reason why>>>
10 MAN-MOCAP, 2k never has that so their animations are just random and not fluid like a real life 5-on-5 game.
Animation>>>>graphics and flash.
However, I don't think it truely takes 'realism' any higher. The key thing for that is authentic play sets.
Ie, in LIVE...you just never see screens and cuts.
The players just kind of ghost / slide all over the court.
You never see Iverson or RIP or Reggie sprint back...and forth...and cut etc.
The ball handler video of ESPN 2K5 shows Iverson doing this. Inside Drive used to have it also. Both "achieved" this through authentic play sets.
LIVE's mo cap is great, but it would be even better if they implemented real play books...Comment
-
Re: 2k LOOKS realistic BUT Live(after live 04) FEELS Realistic.
Originally posted by JOEdellis1 reason why>>>
10 MAN-MOCAP, 2k never has that so their animations are just random and not fluid like a real life 5-on-5 game.
Animation>>>>graphics and flash.
However, I don't think it truely takes 'realism' any higher. The key thing for that is authentic play sets.
Ie, in LIVE...you just never see screens and cuts.
The players just kind of ghost / slide all over the court.
You never see Iverson or RIP or Reggie sprint back...and forth...and cut etc.
The ball handler video of ESPN 2K5 shows Iverson doing this. Inside Drive used to have it also. Both "achieved" this through authentic play sets.
LIVE's mo cap is great, but it would be even better if they implemented real play books...Comment
-
Re: 2k LOOKS realistic BUT Live(after live 04) FEELS Realistic.
Originally posted by SylentKnytThey're definitely more fluid in 2K5 than in 2K4. But I don't think they're on Lives level. The graphics in ESPN are better no doubt, but they're still behind as far as the fluidity in the animations. Check out the tip-in video for Live, look at some of those putback dunks and you'll see what I mean.
oh man.. i dont know what kind of animations VC keeps year after year but putbacks are old, like 4 years old... and Live/EA say its "new"... VC does the same thing with hopstep but its just off as far as live is pushing the putbacks.. they were in nba 2k2... layup tip ins and dunk tip ins..
It's just the way the business is I guess.. to take an idea that isnt yours and say it is... thats a definition of plagerism... IMO ().
At least they feed off each others artist abilities and try to outdo one another. Except for the fact Live's graphics suck and they make way more money... i can never understand that.... seriously..Comment
-
Re: 2k LOOKS realistic BUT Live(after live 04) FEELS Realistic.
Originally posted by SylentKnytThey're definitely more fluid in 2K5 than in 2K4. But I don't think they're on Lives level. The graphics in ESPN are better no doubt, but they're still behind as far as the fluidity in the animations. Check out the tip-in video for Live, look at some of those putback dunks and you'll see what I mean.
oh man.. i dont know what kind of animations VC keeps year after year but putbacks are old, like 4 years old... and Live/EA say its "new"... VC does the same thing with hopstep but its just off as far as live is pushing the putbacks.. they were in nba 2k2... layup tip ins and dunk tip ins..
It's just the way the business is I guess.. to take an idea that isnt yours and say it is... thats a definition of plagerism... IMO ().
At least they feed off each others artist abilities and try to outdo one another. Except for the fact Live's graphics suck and they make way more money... i can never understand that.... seriously..Comment
-
Re: 2k LOOKS realistic BUT Live(after live 04) FEELS Realistic.
Originally posted by WallyHoppIIIoh man.. i dont know what kind of animations VC keeps year after year but putbacks are old, like 4 years old... and Live/EA say its "new"... VC does the same thing with hopstep but its just off as far as live is pushing the putbacks.. they were in nba 2k2... layup tip ins and dunk tip ins..
It's just the way the business is I guess.. to take an idea that isnt yours and say it is... thats a definition of plagerism... IMO ().
At least they feed off each others artist abilities and try to outdo one another. Except for the fact Live's graphics suck and they make way more money... i can never understand that.... seriously..
Live had Freestyle Air - then ESPN said Oh you can change your shot in midair..
Live had Franchise - then ESPN got Franchise...
Live had Authentic sneakers - now this year ESPN has Official Reebok sneakers and create your own shoe..
and as you said live has Pro Hop - now ESPN had Hop Step
hahaha
Live is Innovative and not scared to try new things, while ESPN waits for live to implement things and then copies them.....Last edited by rawdog805; 09-18-2004, 09:28 PM.PSN: duFFleBaG_rAn_
XBox One GT: rawdog805
Twitch: dufflebag_ran
Steam: rawdog805Comment
Comment