Re: Looks like Inside Drive 2004 will once again hold the title for be
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
neovsmatrix said:
I already said sales have very little to do with the quality of the game. Drop it, it's not a valid argument. Even if it were, I doubt you could provide hard facts as to the sales of Id 2003 and the NBA 2k series when it was on the Dreamcast. There are a lot of factors you'd have to take into account, so it's not even worth getting into.
Why are you even debating the merits of Live, ID, and NBA 2k right now? We can get into this when the titles come out. Fact is, it's been done to death already, and I'm sick of it.
If you believe NBA 2k's better, that's your right. That doesn't mean anything to me, because I obviously don't hold the same opinion. I MAY hold that opinion when the new games are released, but right now I don't.
I liked ID 2003 better than any b-ball game so far. It has a great player editor that lets you edit player tendencies and make it play like its real life counterpart, or at least very close to it. Its off-the-ball movement is fantastic, as well as the adjustments it makes on offense and defense.
Granted, there are a few things missing in this game, such as fouls in the paint, more fouls in general, tougher D in the post, the passing is too accurate which hurts whatever good D there is.
I'd rather High Voltage fix these things than add extraneous features. I'd prefer better gameplay over better graphics. But then again, I'm not a shallow gamer, I buy my games to play them, not just look at them.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Amen.....neo knows his stuff when it comes to basketball
i for one share many of his opinions even if i dont articulate them as well
in my opinion neo is to basketball games
as hrudley32 is to hockey games
look as forward to your impressions this year neo as i do to the actual basketball games themselves
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
neovsmatrix said:
I already said sales have very little to do with the quality of the game. Drop it, it's not a valid argument. Even if it were, I doubt you could provide hard facts as to the sales of Id 2003 and the NBA 2k series when it was on the Dreamcast. There are a lot of factors you'd have to take into account, so it's not even worth getting into.
Why are you even debating the merits of Live, ID, and NBA 2k right now? We can get into this when the titles come out. Fact is, it's been done to death already, and I'm sick of it.
If you believe NBA 2k's better, that's your right. That doesn't mean anything to me, because I obviously don't hold the same opinion. I MAY hold that opinion when the new games are released, but right now I don't.
I liked ID 2003 better than any b-ball game so far. It has a great player editor that lets you edit player tendencies and make it play like its real life counterpart, or at least very close to it. Its off-the-ball movement is fantastic, as well as the adjustments it makes on offense and defense.
Granted, there are a few things missing in this game, such as fouls in the paint, more fouls in general, tougher D in the post, the passing is too accurate which hurts whatever good D there is.
I'd rather High Voltage fix these things than add extraneous features. I'd prefer better gameplay over better graphics. But then again, I'm not a shallow gamer, I buy my games to play them, not just look at them.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Amen.....neo knows his stuff when it comes to basketball
i for one share many of his opinions even if i dont articulate them as well
in my opinion neo is to basketball games
as hrudley32 is to hockey games
look as forward to your impressions this year neo as i do to the actual basketball games themselves
HMMMMMMMMM...Why is that?
Comment