Weekly Dynamic Update Discussion

[Bigdmo9999]

Re: Weekly Dynamic Update Discussion

Can't you download the update, download rosters after that, start a dynasty, then delete the update? Won't you then not experience any of the update problems in your dynasty and have rosters/schedules?

[eamuscatuli15]

Re: Weekly Dynamic Update Discussion

i'm not sure how that would work. i think once you download the update and start the dynasty the update will be in the dynasty regardless of deleting the update (which is only deleting your game profile)...explain why it might work the way you're talking about...thanks for the feedback.

[Bigdmo9999]

Re: Weekly Dynamic Update Discussion

It was just a thought. My theory is that the update isn't tied into rosters and its in your profile, so if you start a dynasty with whatever rosters and get yourself a new profile, your dynasty shouldn't be effected.

[NoDakHusker]

Re: Weekly Dynamic Update Discussion

hey ndhusker what roster download are you using for the game? i haven't really played last couple days due to holiday so just curious which roster is most realistic at the moment????

I'm using the OS 360 community rosters done, the gamertag to look for is ACEMAB.

Can't you download the update, download rosters after that, start a dynasty, then delete the update? Won't you then not experience any of the update problems in your dynasty and have rosters/schedules?

Unfortunately no. The update goes into both the rosters and your profile, and I've found even after deleting my profile and leaving the rosters, it still plays that way. It's a good idea Bigd, but it doesn't work.
I really would like to know why it plays differently after the update, because I want the updates, but not the way the game plays after I get it. You just can't tell the difference between a Georgetown and a Delaware State.

[Omega Kid]

Re: Weekly Dynamic Update Discussion

U guys who tried it, suggest to apply the update? thx

[HustlinOwl]

Re: Weekly Dynamic Update Discussion

Wonder if we will see any player changes.

1. Kansas
2. Texas
3. Villanova
4. Purdue
5. Kentucky
6. Duke
7. West Virginia
8. Syracuse
9. Michigan State
10. North Carolina
11. Tennessee
12. Washington
13. Florida
14. Connecticut
15. Ohio State
16. Georgetown
17. Gonzaga
18. Clemson
19. Texas A&M
20. Louisville
21. Florida State
22. Cincinnati
23. Butler
24. UNLV
25. Portland

[Bigdmo9999]

Re: Weekly Dynamic Update Discussion

Portland ftw

[Caliparty Love]

Re: Weekly Dynamic Update Discussion

Portland ftw

Definitely, they smashed UCLA. Shot 60% as a team from 3PT range

[KleShreen]

Re: Weekly Dynamic Update Discussion

Definitely, they smashed UCLA. Shot 60% as a team from 3PT range

Who hasn't smashed UCLA? Losses to CS-Fullerton, Portland, Long Beach State...oof.

[Jason2112]

Re: Weekly Dynamic Update Discussion

Not sure about you all, but I'm not too confident in EA's "updates." I didn't see much, if any, improvement with player ratings. Yeah, it's all good and well that they update the top 25 and team statistics, but I want player ratings to be accurate. I'm finished, for now, with an early season roster re-rate so check it out in EA Locker. Filename is Jason2112Update.

[jake44np]

Re: Weekly Dynamic Update Discussion

Not sure about you all, but I'm not too confident in EA's "updates." I didn't see much, if any, improvement with player ratings. Yeah, it's all good and well that they update the top 25 and team statistics, but I want player ratings to be accurate. I'm finished, for now, with an early season roster re-rate so check it out in EA Locker. Filename is Jason2112Update.

Did you re-rate the 3pt ratings? If so for how many teams?

Are we getting a dynamic update today??

[hustle55]

Re: Weekly Dynamic Update Discussion

I would like to know if we are getting a dynamic update today as well.

[Jason2112]

Re: Weekly Dynamic Update Discussion

Did you re-rate the 3pt ratings? If so for how many teams?

Are we getting a dynamic update today??

The main area of my re-rate project was 3 point ratings because as you all know, they are all messed up. I did not go through every single player in the game, but I went through most starters and definitely all the important players in the game. They had Louisville's Reginald Delk like a 50 something from 3-pt range. He is shooting 61 percent from 3-land in 5 games and averaging 1.6 made 3s per game so I put him in the 90s. (Can't remember exactly what I rated him, but I know it was 90 something.) This is just one of the many examples I run across. I can't promise you that I have Nicholls St. (if theyre even in the game) or Eastern Washington's ratings exactly correct, but I can promise you that this roster is light years ahead of the default roster. Also, I can't speak for the new update that should come out today. Who knows? Maybe EA will surprise us?

[Hova57]

Re: Weekly Dynamic Update Discussion

The main area of my re-rate project was 3 point ratings because as you all know, they are all messed up. I did not go through every single player in the game, but I went through most starters and definitely all the important players in the game. They had Louisville's Reginald Delk like a 50 something from 3-pt range. He is shooting 61 percent from 3-land in 5 games and averaging 1.6 made 3s per game so I put him in the 90s. (Can't remember exactly what I rated him, but I know it was 90 something.) This is just one of the many examples I run across. I can't promise you that I have Nicholls St. (if theyre even in the game) or Eastern Washington's ratings exactly correct, but I can promise you that this roster is light years ahead of the default roster. Also, I can't speak for the new update that should come out today. Who knows? Maybe EA will surprise us?

are ur rosters named too using the community rosters

[Ironic]

Re: Weekly Dynamic Update Discussion

just got the update..(360) THUMBS DOWN....