***Official 2007 NBA Playoffs Discussion Thread***

[bkrich83]

Re: ***Official 2007 NBA Playoffs Discussion Thread***

Talking about why we can post anywhere, thats a waste of typing, dont ya think.

So is telling someone not to post in certain forums, because you don't like what they say. Wouldn't you agree?

[Gibbz]

Re: ***Official 2007 NBA Playoffs Discussion Thread***

its not sour grapes, i actually hate the jazz too, i wanted to see the warriors go all the way this year. but it gets ridiculious, dont listen to the commentators and watch for yourself sometimes

You keep changing your views. Earlier you were telling Ginobili to take a man-shower(which absolutely boggles my mind), you call him a puss(like Vlade Divac to be exact), and now you say you like the way he plays?

[23]

Re: ***Official 2007 NBA Playoffs Discussion Thread***

Anyhow, anyone thing the Jazz can win another game ?

[RobtAndProud]

Re: ***Official 2007 NBA Playoffs Discussion Thread***

At any rate, I personally belive a technical foul there was above and beyond what was needed.

i agree, I believe that it should have been a double foul or just let them continue to play.

[bkrich83]

Re: ***Official 2007 NBA Playoffs Discussion Thread***

I didn't say i don't like what you said...

I said, what's the point?

You said you don't watch the NBA anymore. So, why comment on it?

A - You don't watch it. Thus have no real way of commenting with any knowledge.

B - You're not watching, thus why care?

It would be like someone going into a forum about a TV show and saying "hey, I don't watch this show...but it's crap".

I mean...where's the point and logic to that?

Moving on........................................

Because I have been watching the playoffs? Because i can post here, if I choose?

Again you don't like what I say, simply ignore my posts. It's not rocket science, so I don't see the need to make this thread about me or my posting habits.

[GSW]

Re: ***Official 2007 NBA Playoffs Discussion Thread***

its not sour grapes, i actually hate the jazz too, i wanted to see the warriors go all the way this year. but it gets ridiculious, dont listen to the commentators and watch for yourself sometimes

i watched boozer push and hold my team all series man.. you dont have to tell me about fouling.

[bball_1523]

Re: ***Official 2007 NBA Playoffs Discussion Thread***

it's funny how we are all complaining about the horrible reffing in this game rather than the basketball that way played by both teams. And I think we have all the reason to complain. I wonder what stern is thinking right now.

anyways, spurs played well, they were probably gonna win this despite all the flopping or whatever.

[bkrich83]

Re: ***Official 2007 NBA Playoffs Discussion Thread***

i agree, I believe that it should have been a double foul or just let them continue to play.

Am I crazy, or would a simple no call have sufficed there? Was a foul call there even needed? Or am I missing something?

[Scottdau]

Re: ***Official 2007 NBA Playoffs Discussion Thread***

Anyhow, anyone thing the Jazz can win another game ?

Nope it is over, stick a fork in them they are done!

[ehh]

Re: ***Official 2007 NBA Playoffs Discussion Thread***

Ginobili has only Reggie Miller and Antoine Walker to pass on my least-favorite player of all-time list.

[darrenp1518]

Re: ***Official 2007 NBA Playoffs Discussion Thread***

You keep changing your views. Earlier you were telling Ginobili to take a man-shower(which absolutely boggles my mind), you call him a puss(like Vlade Divac to be exact), and now you say you like the way he plays?

sorry buddy ur gettin me mixed up w/ someone else about a shower? i never mentioned anything about a shower! and to me he is a puss, he's just a talented puss. flopping has nothing to do with the talent that someone has. u lose a lot of respect from ppl u play w/ if u flop all the time

[Pointguard]

Re: ***Official 2007 NBA Playoffs Discussion Thread***

Well I know I havent posted ever but I love basketball. Now maybe ginobili did act a little bit in response to derrick fisher but you gotta remember these guys are grown men. It is not like it is some 5'6 guy bumping into someone. Fisher is 6'1, 205lbs and Manu is the same weight but 5 inches taller. That is alot of mass on Fisher. Who knows what point im trying to make but um...GO SPURS! haha....

True, but there is no denying that Ginobli exaggerates alot contact, trying to draw fouls. He may not be a *****, and does take alot of hits inside, but when he does over exaggerate on drives, its a ***** like move.

[Brandon13]

Re: ***Official 2007 NBA Playoffs Discussion Thread***

Ginobili has only Reggie Miller and Antoine Walker to pass on my least-favorite player of all-time list.

I liked Reggie but I'm right there with you on Antoine.

[RobtAndProud]

Re: ***Official 2007 NBA Playoffs Discussion Thread***

Am I crazy, or would a simple no call have sufficed there? Was a foul call there even needed? Or am I missing something?

Well usually in that situation (heated play, emotions) they would do a double foul to cool everyone off and to regain a sort of control over the game. With the technical, they just add fuel to fire so to speak.

[23]

Re: ***Official 2007 NBA Playoffs Discussion Thread***

it's funny how we are all complaining about the horrible reffing in this game rather than the basketball that way played by both teams. And I think we have all the reason to complain. I wonder what stern is thinking right now.

anyways, spurs played well, they were probably gonna win this despite all the flopping or whatever.

Thing is, Pop is a far better coach than Van Gundy and he makes adjustments so teh Jazz's strategy of pull and scratch won't outdo San Antonio.

The Warrirors didn't have the inside game to keep up in the end, but the way the Jazz got here won't work anymore beyond what it has.