Which is the better stat line of these PGs

[RonnieG]

Re: Which is the better stat line of these PGs

I'll take C and D,probably because I want them to score more,but it really does depend on what team they are on,miami would want rondo because he plays good with lots of all stars(we'll see about how he plays when they leave). rose would be good on a sorry team that needs scoring,it depends on what team you have.

I think if any of those guys, played with a bunch of scoring options, they'd have a lot more assists.

[Chrisksaint]

Re: Which is the better stat line of these PGs

I think if any of those guys, played with a bunch of scoring options, they'd have a lot more assists.

The same could be said for B tho, cause he almost has the least support

[RonnieG]

Re: Which is the better stat line of these PGs

The same could be said for B tho, cause he almost has the least support

I just said it could be said for all of them. Someone said one of them is better suited for Miami because they play on a team thats similar to Miami. If A-D played on a team like Miami, all of them would have better assist numbers.

[Chrisksaint]

Re: Which is the better stat line of these PGs

I just said it could be said for all of them. Someone said one of them is better suited for Miami because they play on a team thats similar to Miami. If A-D played on a team like Miami, all of them would have better assist numbers.

Yeah sorry misread it thought you just meant c and D

[Yeah...THAT Guy]

Re: Which is the better stat line of these PGs

I like C, then B, then A, then D.

[Po Pimp]

Re: Which is the better stat line of these PGs

.1 rebound difference is covered by a whole point in steals.

The whole basis of your argument was you would take PG A because of his rebounding which he averages less than PG D.

A

9 characters



Player A's team is 6-4 without him 18-3 with him.

Like I said...they were doing fine without him. They only lost their last 2 games because their MVP PF got injured. They should have won their Christmas game also, which would have made them 7-1 without their PG and with their PF.

[Jukeman]

Re: Which is the better stat line of these PGs

The whole basis of your argument was you would take PG A because of his rebounding which he averages less than PG D.


Like I said...they were doing fine without him. They only lost their last 2 games because their MVP PF got injured. They should have won their Christmas game also, which would have made them 7-1 without their PG and with their PF.

Ok Im done...

[Po Pimp]

Re: Which is the better stat line of these PGs

Ok Im done...

Regardless, they are 6-2 with no Rondo and KG. They're 0-2 without both. Rondo should be back soon, so we'll see how well they play with just Rondo, Allen, Pierce and Shaq.

[ParisB]

Re: Which is the better stat line of these PGs

As I was trying to explain in another thread, one of the worst things you can do in picking a player is setting up a spreadsheet and comparing stats. Totally different players on different teams with different needs and different offenses and different roles. If Player A averages 14 assists, it doesn't mean he's a better passer than Player B or whatever. Geez some of you guys...

[ParisB]

Re: Which is the better stat line of these PGs

FWIW, Paul, Rose, and Deron all rank higher than Rondo in player efficiency (who is a staggering 9th).

[Jukeman]

Re: Which is the better stat line of these PGs

FWIW, Paul, Rose, and Deron all rank higher than Rondo in player efficiency (who is a staggering 9th).

NBA.com evaluates all players based on the efficiency formula: ((Points + Rebounds + Assists + Steals + Blocks) - ((Field Goals Att. - Field Goals Made) + (Free Throws Att. - Free Throws Made) + Turnovers))

Different roles right?

[ajf14]

Re: Which is the better stat line of these PGs

I'll take B or C, but if I had to choose it would probably be C, even if B has more steals. Not A, because of the turnovers.

[Yeah...THAT Guy]

Re: Which is the better stat line of these PGs

FWIW, Paul, Rose, and Deron all rank higher than Rondo in player efficiency (who is a staggering 9th).

Also for what it's worth, if you take their player efficiency and compare it to their matchup, the rankings would be like this (# in parentheses is how much higher their PER is than their matchup):
1. Paul (+16.3)
2. Rondo (+7.5-8)
3. Williams (+6)
4. Rose (+2.3)

[Yeah...THAT Guy]

Re: Which is the better stat line of these PGs

I'll take B or C, but if I had to choose it would probably be C, even if B has more steals. Not A, because of the turnovers.

I'm kinda scratching my head at this. You know A has the #2 Ast/TO ratio right?

[ex carrabba fan]

Re: Which is the better stat line of these PGs

FWIW, Paul, Rose, and Deron all rank higher than Rondo in player efficiency (who is a staggering 9th).

LOL. Care to post the other players on that list?

You saying there's 9 PG's better in the other thread than Rondo is great