3/28 - 4/3 Game Discussion Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TheMatrix31
    RF
    • Jul 2002
    • 52936

    #196
    Re: 3/28 - 4/3 Game Discussion Thread

    It is his account. He follows me too. Awesome.

    And GOOD FOR HIM. Guaranteed his teammates pick up that fine if he's fined.

    Comment

    • ex carrabba fan
      I'll thank him for you
      • Oct 2004
      • 32744

      #197
      Re: 3/28 - 4/3 Game Discussion Thread

      It's probably never a good idea to say that about a boss on the internet. That's one of the dumbest things I've ever read a pro athlete [he's pro right?] say.

      What a tool.

      Comment

      • TheMatrix31
        RF
        • Jul 2002
        • 52936

        #198
        Re: 3/28 - 4/3 Game Discussion Thread

        Originally posted by ex carrabba fan
        It's probably never a good idea to say that about a boss on the internet. That's one of the dumbest things I've ever read a pro athlete [he's pro right?] say.

        What a tool.
        Yeah, yeah.

        Comment

        • ex carrabba fan
          I'll thank him for you
          • Oct 2004
          • 32744

          #199
          Re: 3/28 - 4/3 Game Discussion Thread

          Really though. Especially when you consider the context

          A. Dude is trying to break through into the league I'm guessing since the only reason we know his name is because of this incident

          and

          B. Stern is a known mafia style commish

          Dude dropped the ball on that one

          Comment

          • King_B_Mack
            All Star
            • Jan 2009
            • 24452

            #200
            Re: 3/28 - 4/3 Game Discussion Thread

            Originally posted by ex carrabba fan
            It's probably never a good idea to say that about a boss on the internet. That's one of the dumbest things I've ever read a pro athlete [he's pro right?] say.

            What a tool.
            I wouldn't call him a tool exactly. However that is just not smart at all. Does he not know who David Stern is? He will be lucky to see time in the league ever again fooling around with Don Sternleone

            Comment

            • TheMatrix31
              RF
              • Jul 2002
              • 52936

              #201
              Re: 3/28 - 4/3 Game Discussion Thread

              Originally posted by ex carrabba fan
              Really though. Especially when you consider the context

              A. Dude is trying to break through into the league I'm guessing since the only reason we know his name is because of this incident

              and

              B. Stern is a known mafia style commish

              Dude dropped the ball on that one
              I've known his name for a while....and the rest of the league will too. Dude is legit.

              But again I say, yeah yeah. I don't give a **** what the guy says. Ref does what he does in that situation and he deserves to get axed. Punk shouldn't even have a job to begin with. Good on anyone who speaks their mind regarding the NBA and their BULL****.

              Comment

              • ex carrabba fan
                I'll thank him for you
                • Oct 2004
                • 32744

                #202
                Re: 3/28 - 4/3 Game Discussion Thread

                Yeah I'll be waiting to hear his name Matrix. Good that you knew his name though considering he plays for the Suns haha.
                Originally posted by King_B_Mack
                I wouldn't call him a tool exactly. However that is just not smart at all. Does he not know who David Stern is? He will be lucky to see time in the league ever again fooling around with Don Sternleone
                Publicly saying you hope your boss dies? That's pretty toolish.

                Risking hundreds of thousands of dollars and your career to potentially make millions? That's pretty toolish.

                At the very least he had an idiot moment [won't call him an idiot since we have no clue as to who he is]

                You got ejected, deal with it kid. Or at the very least don't say you hope your boss dies.

                Comment

                • TheMatrix31
                  RF
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 52936

                  #203
                  Re: 3/28 - 4/3 Game Discussion Thread

                  Originally posted by ex carrabba fan

                  At the very least he had an idiot moment [won't call him an idiot since we have no clue as to who he is]

                  Goodness. Stop being so ****ing condescending.

                  Comment

                  • ex carrabba fan
                    I'll thank him for you
                    • Oct 2004
                    • 32744

                    #204
                    Re: 3/28 - 4/3 Game Discussion Thread

                    Originally posted by TheMatrix31
                    Goodness. Stop being so ****ing condescending.
                    Chill bro, I wasn't. We literally don't know who the kid is. Maybe you do, but the rest of America doesn't. So I didn't want to call him a JR Smith or anything like that.

                    Comment

                    • TheMatrix31
                      RF
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 52936

                      #205
                      Re: 3/28 - 4/3 Game Discussion Thread

                      Originally posted by ex carrabba fan
                      Chill bro, I wasn't. We literally don't know who the kid is. Maybe you do, but the rest of America doesn't. So I didn't want to call him a JR Smith or anything like that.
                      You said it four times already. We get it, you don't know who he is, and this dumb comment is the only way anyone will ever hear this scrub's name.

                      Comment

                      • ex carrabba fan
                        I'll thank him for you
                        • Oct 2004
                        • 32744

                        #206
                        Re: 3/28 - 4/3 Game Discussion Thread

                        Originally posted by TheMatrix31
                        You said it four times already. We get it, you don't know who he is, and this dumb comment is the only way anyone will ever hear this scrub's name.
                        Lol, ok you're the one who's cursing and bringing it up again. I was just responding to your claim.

                        Comment

                        • wwharton
                          *ll St*r
                          • Aug 2002
                          • 26949

                          #207
                          Re: 3/28 - 4/3 Game Discussion Thread

                          Originally posted by King_B_Mack
                          Oh don't get me wrong I know dude ain't doing nothing. I'm just talking about how wwharton was saying that we don't know what's being done and the refs having training camps over the summer and all this stuff. The kind of issues these NBA refs have a training camp isn't going to fix. These guys need to start losing big time cash, getting shipped to the D-League for extended periods of time or just flat out fired to get the message through to them. Instead the Joey Crawfords of the world are here calling games year after year after year. The same repeated screwups and issues of trying to inject themselves into the spotlight and allowing they're egos to blow up and nothing is being done to stop it because it's continuing to happen from the same dudes.
                          Ha, for the record maybe you didn't understand that I'm not against the general thought of there being a problem with refs. I look at it more as an overall issue actually. Players go WAY overboard when talking to refs. That's why they started with the quick techs but it's still subjective so instead of it putting a muzzle on the players, it creates more confusion.

                          None of this means that there is no system in place though, which is what I was saying. Refs suck at all levels, trust me on that. They're human, it's a fast paced game and almost every call is based on individual interpretation of the rules. It's like having a consistent strike zone across the league but for EVERY call. It will never be where people want it to be.

                          But the trash talk to AND from the refs is ridiculous and I don't think you can fix one and not the other... and not sure how you can fix both. So, in short, I agree with you for the most part, but still believe the refs are evaluated and checked.

                          Probably not the best thread to ask the question, but what exactly do you think allowing coaches and players talk bad about the refs to the media will do to help any of this?

                          Comment

                          • TheMatrix31
                            RF
                            • Jul 2002
                            • 52936

                            #208
                            Re: 3/28 - 4/3 Game Discussion Thread

                            Come fan with us. SB Nation is the largest independent sports media brand, consisting of SBNation.com, MMAFighting.com and over 300 fan-centric team communities.


                            Yeah we'll see if anything comes out of this "investigation"....lol

                            Comment

                            • King_B_Mack
                              All Star
                              • Jan 2009
                              • 24452

                              #209
                              Re: 3/28 - 4/3 Game Discussion Thread

                              Originally posted by wwharton
                              Ha, for the record maybe you didn't understand that I'm not against the general thought of there being a problem with refs. I look at it more as an overall issue actually. Players go WAY overboard when talking to refs. That's why they started with the quick techs but it's still subjective so instead of it putting a muzzle on the players, it creates more confusion.

                              None of this means that there is no system in place though, which is what I was saying. Refs suck at all levels, trust me on that. They're human, it's a fast paced game and almost every call is based on individual interpretation of the rules. It's like having a consistent strike zone across the league but for EVERY call. It will never be where people want it to be.

                              But the trash talk to AND from the refs is ridiculous and I don't think you can fix one and not the other... and not sure how you can fix both. So, in short, I agree with you for the most part, but still believe the refs are evaluated and checked.

                              Probably not the best thread to ask the question, but what exactly do you think allowing coaches and players talk bad about the refs to the media will do to help any of this?
                              I see what you're saying though I have to say, I don't agree with players going overboard and why the quick tech stuff started. That started more because people were tired of seeing guys complaining and what not after every single whistle. I wouldn't consider that going overboard with the refs. Maybe a little annoying, but they weren't crossing any lines. Not in my eyes anyway.

                              As for how it would help. I don't think it will really help much to make the refs any better, but I think the guys need to be able to vent and voice they're frustrations as opposed to getting hit with fines and suspensions repeatedly whenever they bring up the refs and not follow it up with how much they wanna have they're babies as Stern seems to think they should only be verbalized about.

                              The league may have some system in place but clearly it's not doing anything. My biggest beef as I've always maintained isn't even about blowing calls. They're humans, the game is quick, mistakes will be made. However it's the attitudes and the way they go about calling the games that piss me off. It's the fact that I can look at a ref look right at a blatant rule violation and not blow a whistle in the first quarter, look right at the same type of violation in the fourth quarter or hell a lot of times on the next possesion or two of that same first quarter and suddenly he calls it. That kind of crap is unnacceptable and when I watch NBA games year after year after year and the same refs are making that same mistake over and over again tells me that WHATEVER system (if any) that's in place for improving the refs just is not working and Stern continues to be a douche and act like everything is perfect when I hear him talk about the refs, if he doesn't cop an attitude with the interviewer and start giving him short answers first.

                              Comment

                              • wwharton
                                *ll St*r
                                • Aug 2002
                                • 26949

                                #210
                                Re: 3/28 - 4/3 Game Discussion Thread

                                Originally posted by King_B_Mack
                                I see what you're saying though I have to say, I don't agree with players going overboard and why the quick tech stuff started. That started more because people were tired of seeing guys complaining and what not after every single whistle. I wouldn't consider that going overboard with the refs. Maybe a little annoying, but they weren't crossing any lines. Not in my eyes anyway.

                                As for how it would help. I don't think it will really help much to make the refs any better, but I think the guys need to be able to vent and voice they're frustrations as opposed to getting hit with fines and suspensions repeatedly whenever they bring up the refs and not follow it up with how much they wanna have they're babies as Stern seems to think they should only be verbalized about.

                                The league may have some system in place but clearly it's not doing anything. My biggest beef as I've always maintained isn't even about blowing calls. They're humans, the game is quick, mistakes will be made. However it's the attitudes and the way they go about calling the games that piss me off. It's the fact that I can look at a ref look right at a blatant rule violation and not blow a whistle in the first quarter, look right at the same type of violation in the fourth quarter or hell a lot of times on the next possesion or two of that same first quarter and suddenly he calls it. That kind of crap is unnacceptable and when I watch NBA games year after year after year and the same refs are making that same mistake over and over again tells me that WHATEVER system (if any) that's in place for improving the refs just is not working and Stern continues to be a douche and act like everything is perfect when I hear him talk about the refs, if he doesn't cop an attitude with the interviewer and start giving him short answers first.
                                You don't consider complaining after every whistle as going overboard? I can't agree with that. And beyond that, players CLEARLY show up the refs. Even today, they still do because it happens so much that we say there are too many techs now and that's with letting a lot of crap go.

                                There is absolutely no sport that I know of (can't speak on anything outside of basketball, football and baseball but educated guess about others) that allows players/coaches to talk about officiating to the media. That's how it is, and imo how it should be. It serves no purpose. Whether or not they're allowed to voice complaints to the league is unknown but I'd be SHOCKED if they weren't. How effective is it? That's worth complaining about... but letting people "vent" is definitely not the solution.

                                The style of the game is significant. Alot of NFL rules have changed to make it very clear what should and shouldn't be called. The subjective calls that still exist are the ones that we all argue about every day. Human interpretation of anything is a problem and unfortunately the nature of basketball leaves A LOT to individual judgment.

                                You have a legit beef with that, but it's something that pretty much can't be changed. It will always be a problem. The attitudes? That's a different issue, but again it's an issue on both sides. Everyone involved feel more entitled to act a fool than they should be. That also will never change. After all, this is entertainment... guess it's just harder for some to check when/how they should be animated or over the top and when they shouldn't.

                                Comment

                                Working...