Yoa Ming

[deadman]

Re: Yoa Ming

If you were discussing the topic it would be a different matter, what is going on are debates about past events that can't be changed. You want a discussion try: the series was entertaining and the outcome was a Lakers victory. You want a debate try: there were bad calls all for the Lakers (in who's opinion) or who's the better team (who's opinion). Try to understand the difference. As why participate, read the topic. The thread was about Ming (not the Lakers/Kings) and I gave my opinion on why he was a bad selection for a number 1 pick. Your opinion and reply was noted and the "debate" goes without saying. You have your opinion and I have my opinion.

[**DONOTDELETE**]

Re: Yoa Ming

</font><blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr />
Mad, I think we can agree then that the Kings outplayed the Lakers for a good majority, but the Lakers did what was needed when it was needed in order to win, and the Kings did what was needed when it was needed in order to lose. And the refs might, repeat MIGHT have possibly facilitated certain streaks and collapses throughout the series. I think we can just leave it at that.


<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

Bah! enough with this. I need to focus all of my energy on my Niners for tomorrow night's game. By the way, Lakers rule

P.S. Will, i really don't apprecaite the way you try to talk down to me, maybe it's unintentional, but I'm not a big fan of it. You should save that kind of talk for slow-witted people like ChiczDigMe. But hey, if you wanna engage in a battle of wits/intelligence, then i'll be ready.

[Will]

Re: Yoa Ming

Ok, so I can only talk about things in the past that can be changed. Hmm, ok. Well, that leaves me with nothing. Moving on...

Mad, I seriously wasn't talking down to you. I was just trying to state somethin we could both agree on in the most vanilla of language I could. I apologize if you thought I was talking down to you.