Good McGrady article..

[jmood88]

Re: Good McGrady article..

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
BigMike said:
I personally think T-MAC is a great player but magic management is sending out feelers for t-mac and the response isnt that good. Why? Because many people around the NBA have said the same thing: how many superstars would let their team lose 19 in row? Thats how I feel. Despite personal situations or quality of teammates, 19 in a row?

All this article does for me is clarify why tmac might mention things like depression and retirement, not taking a pretty decent team (on paper) and "leading" them to 19 straight losses.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

Michael Jordan didn't lead his team anywhere until he got some players around him. You can't say that tmac has good teammates on paper because that doesn't mean anything anyway. He's gone out and has had to do just about everything by himself and with his back problems. How is anyone supposed to do everything by himself?

[Tha_Kid]

Re: Good McGrady article..

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
jmood88 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
BigMike said:
I personally think T-MAC is a great player but magic management is sending out feelers for t-mac and the response isnt that good. Why? Because many people around the NBA have said the same thing: how many superstars would let their team lose 19 in row? Thats how I feel. Despite personal situations or quality of teammates, 19 in a row?

All this article does for me is clarify why tmac might mention things like depression and retirement, not taking a pretty decent team (on paper) and "leading" them to 19 straight losses.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

Michael Jordan didn't lead his team anywhere until he got some players around him. You can't say that tmac has good teammates on paper because that doesn't mean anything anyway. He's gone out and has had to do just about everything by himself and with his back problems. How is anyone supposed to do everything by himself?

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

and? Im not comparing anyone or putting down anyone. The argument is not about taking your team somewhere its about having superstar status and losing 19 in a row. I can say he has good teammates on paper because he does. why else would they get who they got??

[Tha_Kid]

Re: Good McGrady article..

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
jmood88 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
BigMike said:
I personally think T-MAC is a great player but magic management is sending out feelers for t-mac and the response isnt that good. Why? Because many people around the NBA have said the same thing: how many superstars would let their team lose 19 in row? Thats how I feel. Despite personal situations or quality of teammates, 19 in a row?

All this article does for me is clarify why tmac might mention things like depression and retirement, not taking a pretty decent team (on paper) and "leading" them to 19 straight losses.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

Michael Jordan didn't lead his team anywhere until he got some players around him. You can't say that tmac has good teammates on paper because that doesn't mean anything anyway. He's gone out and has had to do just about everything by himself and with his back problems. How is anyone supposed to do everything by himself?

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

and? Im not comparing anyone or putting down anyone. The argument is not about taking your team somewhere its about having superstar status and losing 19 in a row. I can say he has good teammates on paper because he does. why else would they get who they got??

[Tha_Kid]

Re: Good McGrady article..

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
jmood88 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
BigMike said:
I personally think T-MAC is a great player but magic management is sending out feelers for t-mac and the response isnt that good. Why? Because many people around the NBA have said the same thing: how many superstars would let their team lose 19 in row? Thats how I feel. Despite personal situations or quality of teammates, 19 in a row?

All this article does for me is clarify why tmac might mention things like depression and retirement, not taking a pretty decent team (on paper) and "leading" them to 19 straight losses.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

Michael Jordan didn't lead his team anywhere until he got some players around him. You can't say that tmac has good teammates on paper because that doesn't mean anything anyway. He's gone out and has had to do just about everything by himself and with his back problems. How is anyone supposed to do everything by himself?

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

and? Im not comparing anyone or putting down anyone. The argument is not about taking your team somewhere its about having superstar status and losing 19 in a row. I can say he has good teammates on paper because he does. why else would they get who they got??

[jmood88]

Re: Good McGrady article..

Obiviously his teammates aren't good because they aren't doing anything. He is the only one on the team that plays great every game. How is he suppose to win every game by himself?

[jmood88]

Re: Good McGrady article..

Obiviously his teammates aren't good because they aren't doing anything. He is the only one on the team that plays great every game. How is he suppose to win every game by himself?

[jmood88]

Re: Good McGrady article..

Obiviously his teammates aren't good because they aren't doing anything. He is the only one on the team that plays great every game. How is he suppose to win every game by himself?

[Tha_Kid]

Re: Good McGrady article..

Noone is supposed to win every game by themself. but when you have a losing streak, the other players look to the star to step it up and pull out a win. all 19 losses werent blowouts. his teammates do play you must not know what youre talking about. There is one superstar on that team, and his name is Mcgrady. definition of a superstar IS one who plays great practically night in night out.

[Tha_Kid]

Re: Good McGrady article..

Noone is supposed to win every game by themself. but when you have a losing streak, the other players look to the star to step it up and pull out a win. all 19 losses werent blowouts. his teammates do play you must not know what youre talking about. There is one superstar on that team, and his name is Mcgrady. definition of a superstar IS one who plays great practically night in night out.

[Tha_Kid]

Re: Good McGrady article..

Noone is supposed to win every game by themself. but when you have a losing streak, the other players look to the star to step it up and pull out a win. all 19 losses werent blowouts. his teammates do play you must not know what youre talking about. There is one superstar on that team, and his name is Mcgrady. definition of a superstar IS one who plays great practically night in night out.

[jmood88]

Re: Good McGrady article..

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
BigMike said:
Noone is supposed to win every game by themself. but when you have a losing streak, the other players look to the star to step it up and pull out a win. all 19 losses werent blowouts. his teammates do play you must not know what youre talking about. There is one superstar on that team, and his name is Mcgrady. definition of a superstar IS one who plays great practically night in night out.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

That's what he does. How are you going to blame him for them losing 19 games? What team has had one great guy and the rest is a team of mediocre players?

[jmood88]

Re: Good McGrady article..

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
BigMike said:
Noone is supposed to win every game by themself. but when you have a losing streak, the other players look to the star to step it up and pull out a win. all 19 losses werent blowouts. his teammates do play you must not know what youre talking about. There is one superstar on that team, and his name is Mcgrady. definition of a superstar IS one who plays great practically night in night out.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

That's what he does. How are you going to blame him for them losing 19 games? What team has had one great guy and the rest is a team of mediocre players?

[jmood88]

Re: Good McGrady article..

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
BigMike said:
Noone is supposed to win every game by themself. but when you have a losing streak, the other players look to the star to step it up and pull out a win. all 19 losses werent blowouts. his teammates do play you must not know what youre talking about. There is one superstar on that team, and his name is Mcgrady. definition of a superstar IS one who plays great practically night in night out.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

That's what he does. How are you going to blame him for them losing 19 games? What team has had one great guy and the rest is a team of mediocre players?

[23]

Re: Good McGrady article..

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
jmood88 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
BigMike said:
Noone is supposed to win every game by themself. but when you have a losing streak, the other players look to the star to step it up and pull out a win. all 19 losses werent blowouts. his teammates do play you must not know what youre talking about. There is one superstar on that team, and his name is Mcgrady. definition of a superstar IS one who plays great practically night in night out.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

That's what he does. How are you going to blame him for them losing 19 games? What team has had one great guy and the rest is a team of mediocre players?

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


The loses are blamed on him alone, yet he's the only one doing anything. He scores 30 25 or 50 and they still lose, and it's his fault they lost right?

[23]

Re: Good McGrady article..

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
jmood88 said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
BigMike said:
Noone is supposed to win every game by themself. but when you have a losing streak, the other players look to the star to step it up and pull out a win. all 19 losses werent blowouts. his teammates do play you must not know what youre talking about. There is one superstar on that team, and his name is Mcgrady. definition of a superstar IS one who plays great practically night in night out.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

That's what he does. How are you going to blame him for them losing 19 games? What team has had one great guy and the rest is a team of mediocre players?

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">


The loses are blamed on him alone, yet he's the only one doing anything. He scores 30 25 or 50 and they still lose, and it's his fault they lost right?