Barnes will probably be the next to go if they make another move.
Yes Sabonis can be a positive addition to the Kings but not enough to justify the cost imo. It could be a great pairing if you surround them with shooters. Barnes isn't long for the team, leaving Holiday at 38%. So not a lot of shooters at all.
Sabonis will be getting paid around $19M.
Halibruton on a rookie contract is making $5, and potentially under team control for what, 6 years?
That's an important part of his trade value. Sabonis is the better player at this stage in their careers. But is he enough to pay him 4 times as much?
It goes beyond "getting 13 a night on a bad team." But even then he put up 16 ppg and 8 apg in December and January (slow start in November brings his averages down). Plus he is a solid defender.
This is a guy whose trade value was only going up. And because of that rookie contract (and also by all accounts he is a great culture guy) there was no need to trade him. Forget about other offers; when you have a guy whose arrow is clearly pointing up and on a team friendly contract you hold him unless you get an offer that blows you away. This ain't it. This has all the marks of a deal done because the Kings felt pressured to do something to end that playoff drought.
Of course I can be wrong and the duo of Sabonis and Fox takes the west by storm and in 2-3 years they can be a 4 seed. But this would be a boring board if we all take the wait and see approach.
Also makes me want to revisit the Simmons trade rumors and why the Kings balked at Philly's asking price.
Comment