Dev question: I still want to know who asked for this?...

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GamingPractitioner
    Rookie
    • Apr 2016
    • 188

    #1

    Dev question: I still want to know who asked for this?...

    Let me first say that this is not "hating" or "bashing" because thats not what i'm here to do. I just simply want to know why out of all the past and present request for a PRIDE FC mode we instead got.....kumite. Now i am getting a feel of the 80's vibe of it and i DO enjoy it because its something different but I seriously want to know how something like this made it and Pride didn't.
  • aholbert32
    (aka Alberto)
    • Jul 2002
    • 33106

    #2
    Re: Dev question: I still want to know who asked for this?...

    Originally posted by GamingPractitioner
    Let me first say that this is not "hating" or "bashing" because thats not what i'm here to do. I just simply want to know why out of all the past and present request for a PRIDE FC mode we instead got.....kumite. Now i am getting a feel of the 80's vibe of it and i DO enjoy it because its something different but I seriously want to know how something like this made it and Pride didn't.
    I'm not a dev but the answer seems pretty obvious:

    1) A Pride mode requires money. EA would have to pay additional money to get the likeness rights to Pride fighters who arent in the game. 21 of the 33 fighters that were in Pride mode in UD3 would require EA to negotiate individual likness deals.

    2) The audience that EA is targeting likely doesnt know or care about Pride. EA isnt targeting hardcore MMA fans or OSers with this game. EA isnt going to put in resources to create a mode that the target audience they want doesnt know or care about.

    Comment

    • martialxd
      Rookie
      • Sep 2017
      • 301

      #3
      Re: Dev question: I still want to know who asked for this?...

      okay
      just add soccer kick 😂
      everything will be fun

      Comment

      • Haz____
        Omaewa mou shindeiru
        • Apr 2016
        • 4023

        #4
        Re: Dev question: I still want to know who asked for this?...

        Originally posted by aholbert32
        I'm not a dev but the answer seems pretty obvious:

        1) A Pride mode requires money. EA would have to pay additional money to get the likeness rights to Pride fighters who arent in the game. 21 of the 33 fighters that were in Pride mode in UD3 would require EA to negotiate individual likness deals.

        2) The audience that EA is targeting likely doesnt know or care about Pride. EA isnt targeting hardcore MMA fans or OSers with this game. EA isnt going to put in resources to create a mode that the target audience they want doesnt know or care about.
        Even if you don't have licensed Pride fighters, they still have rights to the brand don't they? Even if not a "Pride" branded ring, just an MMA arena in a Kickboxing style ring like Pride, Rizin, DREAM, One has done would be super cool, different, but still actually realistic and fitting of the sport.

        Instead we get full Mortal Kombat, with zany sound effects....


        *eyes roll so far back into my skull it literally hurts*
        Last edited by Haz____; 08-18-2020, 01:55 AM.
        PSN: Lord__Hazanko

        Just an average player, with a passion for Martial Arts & Combat Sports

        Comment

        • rabbitfistssaipailo
          MVP
          • Nov 2017
          • 1625

          #5
          Re: Dev question: I still want to know who asked for this?...

          Originally posted by Haz____
          Even if you don't have licensed Pride fighters, they still have rights to the brand don't they? Even if not a "Pride" branded ring, just an MMA arena in a Kickboxing style ring like Pride, Rizin, DREAM, One has done would be super cool, different, but still actually realistic and fitting of the sport.

          Instead we get full Mortal Kombat, with zany sound effects....


          *eyes roll so far back into my skull it literally hurts*
          The way the game is built , they can't put in a boxing ring to replace the octagon. The would have to make another game entirely for that. The devs have explained this before.



          Sent from my Infinix X604 using Operation Sports mobile app

          Comment

          • Find_the_Door
            Nogueira connoisseur
            • Jan 2012
            • 4051

            #6
            Re: Dev question: I still want to know who asked for this?...

            Originally posted by rabbitfistssaipailo
            The way the game is built , they can't put in a boxing ring to replace the octagon. The would have to make another game entirely for that. The devs have explained this before.



            Sent from my Infinix X604 using Operation Sports mobile app
            I don't buy that - all that literally changes is just the boundaries
            Antonio Rodrigo "Minotauro" Nogueira - UFC Hall of Fame

            Comment

            • ryangil23
              Rookie
              • May 2016
              • 418

              #7
              Re: Dev question: I still want to know who asked for this?...

              Is the Kumite ring, if you can call it a ring, not bigger than the normal octagon? It feels bigger anyway.

              Comment

              • Gion
                Rookie
                • Apr 2016
                • 490

                #8
                Re: Dev question: I still want to know who asked for this?...

                Originally posted by Find_the_Door
                I don't buy that - all that literally changes is just the boundaries
                Magical rope physics that require incredible amounts of time and money are also needed
                It's not like there was some boxing series developed by the same company that easily made rope physics in 2004 on a ps2 or anything

                Sent from my SM-G960U using Operation Sports mobile app

                Comment

                • rabbitfistssaipailo
                  MVP
                  • Nov 2017
                  • 1625

                  #9
                  Re: Dev question: I still want to know who asked for this?...

                  Originally posted by ryangil23
                  Is the Kumite ring, if you can call it a ring, not bigger than the normal octagon? It feels bigger anyway.
                  A ring is square shaped , with sharp corners , the way the game is built won't allow it.

                  It would have to be rebuilt for that unless you want bugs and ****.

                  It's possible , don't get me wrong but I don't think we will see pride mode except with CAFs but it's stretch.

                  Sent from my Infinix X604 using Operation Sports mobile app

                  Comment

                  • ryangil23
                    Rookie
                    • May 2016
                    • 418

                    #10
                    Re: Dev question: I still want to know who asked for this?...

                    Originally posted by rabbitfistssaipailo
                    A ring is square shaped , with sharp corners , the way the game is built won't allow it.

                    It would have to be rebuilt for that unless you want bugs and ****.

                    It's possible , don't get me wrong but I don't think we will see pride mode except with CAFs but it's stretch.

                    Sent from my Infinix X604 using Operation Sports mobile app
                    I’m not a game dev so maybe it’s a lot more complicated than it sounds but would making the boundary a square rather than an octagon be that hard?
                    Last edited by ryangil23; 08-18-2020, 07:32 AM.

                    Comment

                    • rabbitfistssaipailo
                      MVP
                      • Nov 2017
                      • 1625

                      #11
                      Re: Dev question: I still want to know who asked for this?...

                      Originally posted by ryangil23
                      I’m not a game dev so maybe it’s a lot more complicated than it sounds but would making the boundary a square rather than an octagon be that hard?
                      From what I heard yes . But don't quote me .

                      Sent from my Infinix X604 using Operation Sports mobile app

                      Comment

                      • Irish0331
                        Banned
                        • Oct 2016
                        • 485

                        #12
                        Re: Dev question: I still want to know who asked for this?...

                        Originally posted by ryangil23
                        I’m not a game dev so maybe it’s a lot more complicated than it sounds but would making the boundary a square rather than an octagon be that hard?
                        It may not be as easy as just throwing it together over the weekend, but i'm not buying that it's some incredibly difficult thing to pull off seeing as how it's been pulled off already going back many years and a couple of consoles.

                        Comment

                        • WarMMA
                          MVP
                          • Apr 2016
                          • 4612

                          #13
                          Re: Dev question: I still want to know who asked for this?...

                          Originally posted by aholbert32
                          I'm not a dev but the answer seems pretty obvious:

                          1) A Pride mode requires money. EA would have to pay additional money to get the likeness rights to Pride fighters who arent in the game. 21 of the 33 fighters that were in Pride mode in UD3 would require EA to negotiate individual likness deals.

                          2) The audience that EA is targeting likely doesnt know or care about Pride. EA isnt targeting hardcore MMA fans or OSers with this game. EA isnt going to put in resources to create a mode that the target audience they want doesnt know or care about.
                          I understand your 1st point, but the 2nd isn't really a matter imo. What I mean is they dont have to know or care about it. Im sure they dont know wth Kumite is either. Its suppose to be just a fun mode right? Same thing Pride could have been to them. I feel like a casual audience would enjoy Pride more than this silly Kumite thing. Like if they had Pride instead of Kumite, you dont think casuals would enjoy the japanese ruleset where they can stomp and kick opponents in the face?
                          Last edited by WarMMA; 08-18-2020, 09:45 AM.

                          Comment

                          • johnmangala
                            MVP
                            • Apr 2016
                            • 4525

                            #14
                            Re: Dev question: I still want to know who asked for this?...

                            Originally posted by aholbert32
                            I'm not a dev but the answer seems pretty obvious:

                            1) A Pride mode requires money. EA would have to pay additional money to get the likeness rights to Pride fighters who arent in the game. 21 of the 33 fighters that were in Pride mode in UD3 would require EA to negotiate individual likness deals.

                            2) The audience that EA is targeting likely doesnt know or care about Pride. EA isnt targeting hardcore MMA fans or OSers with this game. EA isnt going to put in resources to create a mode that the target audience they want doesnt know or care about.
                            Couldn't they just do a pride rules without the fighters?

                            Comment

                            • KoryDub
                              Rookie
                              • Dec 2016
                              • 81

                              #15
                              Re: Dev question: I still want to know who asked for this?...

                              Originally posted by Find_the_Door
                              I don't buy that - all that literally changes is just the boundaries
                              It changes a LOT about the game in terms of a development standpoint.

                              It's pretty frustrating watching people type things like "it can't be that hard" while simultaneously NOT holding any type of computer science degree.

                              This isn't 'coding' they teach in Grade 2 - this is high level and extremely complicated stuff.

                              Lots of people brush it off because they just don't understand.


                              Originally posted by ryangil23
                              I’m not a game dev so maybe it’s a lot more complicated than it sounds but would making the boundary a square rather than an octagon be that hard?
                              Yes. It's incredibly difficult and time consuming.

                              Comment

                              Working...