WWE Netflix/Peacock/ESPN Discussion Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TheMatrix31
    RF
    • Jul 2002
    • 52927

    #2716
    Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

    How did they explain things poorly? You sign up, you log in, and you find **** to watch.

    Comment

    • SPTO
      binging
      • Feb 2003
      • 68046

      #2717
      Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

      If the WWE had made the Network available in NORTH America on launch day I bet you they'd have hit over a million subscribers easily. people tend to underestimate how strong the Canadian market for WWE has been through the years. Remember, in the early/mid '90s it was the Canadian side of the North American market that was keeping Vince afloat until creative hit its stride and the Monday Night Wars really went WWE's way.

      The way the Network is set up in Canada at least for the foreseeable future doesn't really help their subscriber base unless they're going to count the cable subscription rates coming from Rogers Communications.

      Anywho, I bet if Vince had to do it over again he'd have made it available on the continent at the very least.
      Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club

      "Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. Parker

      Comment

      • reyes the roof
        Hall Of Fame
        • Mar 2009
        • 11526

        #2718
        Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

        Originally posted by TheMatrix31
        How did they explain things poorly? You sign up, you log in, and you find **** to watch.
        Yeah if you can't figure out how it works, I think you have bigger problems to worry about

        Comment

        • SmashMan
          All Star
          • Dec 2004
          • 9749

          #2719
          Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

          Originally posted by TheMatrix31
          How did they explain things poorly? You sign up, you log in, and you find **** to watch.
          There are a lot of people who don't know what over-the-top delivery is. It took them months to start saying it was "like Netflix and Hulu" to describe it.

          Comment

          • WWF80sKid
            All Star
            • Nov 2008
            • 7095

            #2720
            Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

            Myself and a buddy of mine were discussing the Network. Our big thing is, Vince is too proud to go back to the way it was. He would have to go to Dish and whoever else dropped PPVs and ask them to pick them back up. I think he'll do whatever it takes to keep this thing going.

            MICHIGAN WOLVERINES
            1901 | 1902 | 1903 | 1904 | 1918 | 1923 | 1932 | 1933 | 1947 | 1948 | 1997 | 2023

            MONTREAL CANADIENS
            1916 | 1924 | 1930 | 1931 | 1944 | 1946 | 1953 | 1956 | 1957 | 1958 | 1959 | 1960 | 1965
            1966 | 1968 | 1971 | 1973 | 1976 | 1977 | 1978 | 1979 | 1986 | 1993

            Comment

            • Trevelyan
              MVP
              • Oct 2003
              • 1047

              #2721
              Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

              Originally posted by SmashMan
              I don't know that I'd call 700,000 in five months disappointing or a disaster. I think they oversold expectations during the initial announcement, but that's what companies do to enhance the perception. The number itself seems fine for a new service.

              I'll agree that they explained the delivery poorly and they need to make a variety of content available alongside the chronological Raw uploads.
              The problem is they're completely bonkers when it comes to the numbers they're expecting to hit one day. The CFO is so misinformed he gets on the phone with stockholders and says they're going to eventually have 3 MILLION SUBSCRIBERS. I'm more likely to get angry and turn into the Hulk. They'll be lucky if they even hit 1 million once its rolled out worldwide.

              I'm still betting they eventually settle in around 600k-700k, and jack the price up to compensate.

              Comment

              • Majingir
                Moderator
                • Apr 2005
                • 47670

                #2722
                Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

                Originally posted by SPTO
                If the WWE had made the Network available in NORTH America on launch day I bet you they'd have hit over a million subscribers easily. people tend to underestimate how strong the Canadian market for WWE has been through the years. Remember, in the early/mid '90s it was the Canadian side of the North American market that was keeping Vince afloat until creative hit its stride and the Monday Night Wars really went WWE's way.

                The way the Network is set up in Canada at least for the foreseeable future doesn't really help their subscriber base unless they're going to count the cable subscription rates coming from Rogers Communications.

                Anywho, I bet if Vince had to do it over again he'd have made it available on the continent at the very least.
                To be fair, WWE did have Bret Hart during that time period so it was even more obvious why they were so huge in Canada. Part of reason why I think popularity in Canada today isn't AS huge,though it still is real popular(Raw does similar ratings as Monday Night Football in Canada). WWE today doesn't have any big name Canadian. Before it was Bret,Owen and stuff and right after it was golden age of Canadian wrestling with Edge,Christian,Jericho,Trish and that other guy. Today you don't really have anyone(Jericho doesn't really count since he's part time guy and all), Sami Zayn and Tyson Kidd are prob the biggest.


                I don't get how over 10% of the USA tv audience is bad for WWE Network subscriptions. Netflix has over 35M subscribers WORLDWIDE and that's the most popular thing out there which attracts fans of hundreds of past + current tv series/movies. WWE Network once it goes worldwide will get over 1M combined for sure(maybe even 2-3M,depending just how many fans are actually in the "WWE Universe" outside of USA) and WWE is just 1 brand. I'd consider those numbers good.

                Comment

                • DTX3
                  Hall Of Fame
                  • Jun 2003
                  • 13022

                  #2723
                  Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

                  I cannot wait until they start adding 1996-1997 RAWs. I need more whining ***** Bret Hart on my TV screen. I couldn't stand Hart back then and was a huge HBK and Austin fan, those were the best times.
                  XBL: DTX3
                  PSN: DTX987
                  WII U: DodgerBlue760

                  Comment

                  • cima
                    Hall Of Fame
                    • Sep 2004
                    • 13478

                    #2724
                    Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

                    Looks like all of the SNME episodes have been uploaded!

                    Comment

                    • TripleCrown9
                      Keep the Faith
                      • May 2010
                      • 23706

                      #2725
                      Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

                      No Way Out 2003 is a somewhat solid show.
                      Boston Red Sox
                      1903 1912 1915 1916 1918 2004 2007 2013 2018
                      9 4 1 8 27 6 14 45 26 34

                      Comment

                      • AirJordanFan93
                        Pro
                        • Jun 2012
                        • 788

                        #2726
                        Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

                        Originally posted by Trevelyan
                        The problem is they're completely bonkers when it comes to the numbers they're expecting to hit one day. The CFO is so misinformed he gets on the phone with stockholders and says they're going to eventually have 3 MILLION SUBSCRIBERS. I'm more likely to get angry and turn into the Hulk. They'll be lucky if they even hit 1 million once its rolled out worldwide.

                        I'm still betting they eventually settle in around 600k-700k, and jack the price up to compensate.
                        Due to massive cost cutting for the remainder of 2014 and for 2015 the break even point for the Network has been lowered from 1.4 Million to 500,000 subscribers. So even if they maintained between 600,700k they would make a small profit.

                        Comment

                        • Chrisksaint
                          $$$
                          • Apr 2010
                          • 19127

                          #2727
                          Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

                          Watched Wrestlemania 2000 yesterday. The triangle ladder match was great, Edge and Christian winning kind of felt anticlimatic because I forgot they were even in the match for like 10-15 minutes it felt like.

                          This was the first time i've seen Eddie and Benoit during my WWE PPV watch and it just made the whole viewing kind of weird when you notice how many of these wrestlers are no longer with us just on this one card. They even showed Michael Clarke Duncan ringside before the Main Event

                          Speaking of the Main Event, even though The Rock got screwed him rock bottoming all 3 of the McMahons to end the show was just great.
                          Saints, LSU, Seminoles, Pelicans, Marlins, Lightning

                          Comment

                          • TripleCrown9
                            Keep the Faith
                            • May 2010
                            • 23706

                            #2728
                            Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

                            WrestleMania X8 is a fun show, with all the hardcore matches.
                            Boston Red Sox
                            1903 1912 1915 1916 1918 2004 2007 2013 2018
                            9 4 1 8 27 6 14 45 26 34

                            Comment

                            • King_B_Mack
                              All Star
                              • Jan 2009
                              • 24450

                              #2729
                              Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

                              Just noticed Jacqueline in one of those Double J vignettes in a '93 RAW episode. Think the one after The Brain's last RAW. Looked like it was pre-enhancements too lol.

                              Comment

                              • jvalverde88
                                Moderator
                                • Jun 2008
                                • 11787

                                #2730
                                Re: WWE Network Discussion Thread

                                Originally posted by King_B_Mack
                                Just noticed Jacqueline in one of those Double J vignettes in a '93 RAW episode. Think the one after The Brain's last RAW. Looked like it was pre-enhancements too lol.
                                If notice in the early Raws, you'll see a lot of enhancement talents that had decent WWE careers in the future. For example, I saw Scotty Too Hotty AKA Scott Taylor.
                                Mets/Giants/Knicks/Rangers/Manchester United/Notre Dame Football

                                Never let fear determine who you are. Never let where you came from determine where you are going.

                                Comment

                                Working...