NCAA Football '13-Team Ratings

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • blkrptnt819
    MVP
    • Feb 2011
    • 2055

    #136
    Originally posted by LucasWVU
    Makes no since. My Mountaineers have made 3 BCS bowls in 6 years and won them all.

    2005 Sugar Georgia 38-35 W
    2006 Gator Georgia Tech 38-35 W
    2007 Fiesta Oklahoma 48-28 W
    2008 Meineke Car Care North Carolina 31-30 W
    2009 Gator Florida State 21-33 L
    2010 Champs Sports N.C. State 7-23 L
    2011 Orange Clemson 70-33 W

    There has to be something else to it.
    Big East, your conference is what's holding you back.
    CFB: Ohio State, FSU
    CBB: DUKIE BLUE DEVILS!!!!!!!
    NBA: Cleveland Cavaliers

    If you can't tell I LOVE DUKE!!!!!!!!

    Comment

    • blkrptnt819
      MVP
      • Feb 2011
      • 2055

      #137
      Originally posted by AuburnAlumni
      LOL...If ND doesn't deserve it? Um, ND hasn't done anything in the last 20 years. That's a pretty bad comparison. Especially when Auburn has won a NC in 2010, gone undefeated in 2004, and has had one losing season in the last 10 years.

      Not that it even matters anyway. Prestige in the game is PURELY a recruiting attribute. That is all that it matters about in the game.

      Auburn's recruiting under Chizik has been Top 10 every single year he's had a full year to recruit. This coming class will be yet another Top 10 class as well.

      The 6* prestige is fine for AU.
      You dont compare recents compare overalls. And recruiting class mean nothing til they produce. Prestige is earned on the field though and if it's purely recruiting Boise wouldn't be a 5*. They don't recruit that level of player. And before the NC what were u guys doing? Cam Newton, one player doesn't make you a 6*.
      CFB: Ohio State, FSU
      CBB: DUKIE BLUE DEVILS!!!!!!!
      NBA: Cleveland Cavaliers

      If you can't tell I LOVE DUKE!!!!!!!!

      Comment

      • LucasWVU
        Banned
        • Jul 2011
        • 732

        #138
        Re: NCAA Football '13-Team Ratings

        Originally posted by blkrptnt819
        Big East, your conference is what's holding you back.
        We are now in the Big 12 sir.

        Comment

        • Melo_man28
          Rookie
          • Jun 2012
          • 37

          #139
          Re: NCAA Football '13-Team Ratings

          please tell me this is fake... what ******* has teams like texas ( maybe a top 20 team) with a better rating then bama and the same as LSU and USC.... i think they are trying to make us NOT want to buy the game now...

          Comment

          • LucasWVU
            Banned
            • Jul 2011
            • 732

            #140
            Re: NCAA Football '13-Team Ratings

            Originally posted by blkrptnt819
            You dont compare recents compare overalls. And recruiting class mean nothing til they produce. Prestige is earned on the field though and if it's purely recruiting Boise wouldn't be a 5*. They don't recruit that level of player. And before the NC what were u guys doing? Cam Newton, one player doesn't make you a 6*.
            So if im right, these are the 6 stars?

            Alabama - Worthy
            Auburn - Unworthy
            Florida - Worthy
            LSU - Worthy
            Michigan +1 - Unworthy
            Notre Dame +1 - Unworthy
            Ohio State - Worthy
            Oklahoma - Worthy
            Oregon - Worthy
            Texas - Worthy
            USC - Worthy

            My opinion.

            Comment

            • blkrptnt819
              MVP
              • Feb 2011
              • 2055

              #141
              Originally posted by LucasWVU
              So if im right, these are the 6 stars?

              Alabama - Worthy
              Auburn - Unworthy
              Florida - Worthy
              LSU - Worthy
              Michigan +1 - Unworthy
              Notre Dame +1 - Unworthy
              Ohio State - Worthy
              Oklahoma - Worthy
              Oregon - Worthy
              Texas - Worthy
              USC - Worthy

              My opinion.
              Oregon just won it's first BCS game last year. They have no history. If losing in the BCS gams stands for something the OSU jokes should stop then.
              CFB: Ohio State, FSU
              CBB: DUKIE BLUE DEVILS!!!!!!!
              NBA: Cleveland Cavaliers

              If you can't tell I LOVE DUKE!!!!!!!!

              Comment

              • blkrptnt819
                MVP
                • Feb 2011
                • 2055

                #142
                Originally posted by LucasWVU
                We are now in the Big 12 sir.
                But for years you were in the Big East. You can't move up prestige before you have played a game. You haven't shown you can compete.
                CFB: Ohio State, FSU
                CBB: DUKIE BLUE DEVILS!!!!!!!
                NBA: Cleveland Cavaliers

                If you can't tell I LOVE DUKE!!!!!!!!

                Comment

                • LucasWVU
                  Banned
                  • Jul 2011
                  • 732

                  #143
                  Re: NCAA Football '13-Team Ratings

                  Originally posted by Melo_man28
                  please tell me this is fake... what ******* has teams like texas ( maybe a top 20 team) with a better rating then bama and the same as LSU and USC.... i think they are trying to make us NOT want to buy the game now...


                  Comment

                  • gator3guy
                    MVP
                    • Jul 2004
                    • 2233

                    #144
                    Re: NCAA Football '13-Team Ratings

                    Notre Dame and Michigan are always going to be 6*. They are always going to be prestigious programs. Just look at the recruits they get each year. There is more history factored into prestige then anything and those two schools certainly have a storied history.

                    Comment

                    • AuburnAlumni
                      War Eagle
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 11939

                      #145
                      Originally posted by blkrptnt819
                      You dont compare recents compare overalls. And recruiting class mean nothing til they produce. Prestige is earned on the field though and if it's purely recruiting Boise wouldn't be a 5*. They don't recruit that level of player. And before the NC what were u guys doing? Cam Newton, one player doesn't make you a 6*.
                      IN THE GAME... Prestige is a recruiting attribute. Boise gets it for their 10+ win seasons every year so yes. But what does prestige affect in the game?

                      Recruiting. As I said, AU recruits at an elite level under Chiz so in that regard, the rating is fine.

                      If you don't like the rating, that's your prerogative. But regarding it's major functionality in the GAME, recruiting, it's very plausible.

                      Auburn has a NC and a boatload of 4 and 5 star talent on the depth chart (all underclassmen it seems as well). I don't see the reason for the hate.

                      UF has been mediocre to bad the last 3 years.

                      Ohio State isn't exactly in tip top shape right now BTW.
                      AUBURN TIGERS
                      MINNESOTA VIKINGS
                      INDIANA PACERS

                      Comment

                      • LucasWVU
                        Banned
                        • Jul 2011
                        • 732

                        #146
                        Re: NCAA Football '13-Team Ratings

                        Originally posted by blkrptnt819
                        But for years you were in the Big East. You can't move up prestige before you have played a game. You haven't shown you can compete.
                        So you are telling me that over the past 6 years that West Virginia has not been on the level of teams like Arkansas, Boise, Clemson, Miami, Nebraska, Oklahoma State, Penn State, Stanford, TCU, VT, and Wisconsin?

                        Well bless your heart.

                        The fact of the matter is, there are 4 stars that can be argued as 5 stars and some 5 stars should be 4 stars.

                        Comment

                        • The Kid 24
                          It's Show Time!
                          • Jan 2007
                          • 14762

                          #147
                          Re: NCAA Football '13-Team Ratings

                          Originally posted by LucasWVU


                          What are you trying to show?
                          Milwaukee Brewers | Green Bay Packers | North Carolina Tar Heels | Wisconsin Badgers

                          Comment

                          • LucasWVU
                            Banned
                            • Jul 2011
                            • 732

                            #148
                            Re: NCAA Football '13-Team Ratings

                            Originally posted by The Kid 24
                            What are you trying to show?
                            The Bama fan at the top of this page wondered why the Longhorns team ratings were so good that they were up there with Bama and LSU and I was just showing him the top ten players from UT and LSU so that he could compare if he had not already seen them.

                            Comment

                            • The Kid 24
                              It's Show Time!
                              • Jan 2007
                              • 14762

                              #149
                              Re: NCAA Football '13-Team Ratings

                              Originally posted by LucasWVU
                              The Bama fan at the top of this page wondered why the Longhorns team ratings were so good that they were up there with Bama and LSU and I was just showing him the top ten players from UT and LSU so that he could compare if he had not already seen them.
                              Oh I only saw the pic of LSU ratings.
                              Milwaukee Brewers | Green Bay Packers | North Carolina Tar Heels | Wisconsin Badgers

                              Comment

                              • LucasWVU
                                Banned
                                • Jul 2011
                                • 732

                                #150
                                Re: NCAA Football '13-Team Ratings

                                Originally posted by blkrptnt819
                                Oregon just won it's first BCS game last year. They have no history. If losing in the BCS gams stands for something the OSU jokes should stop then.
                                Here is the difference between Auburn and Oregon, Oregon has been consistent over the past 3 years.

                                No offense to Auburn fans, great recruiting with Chizik, but they only had one great year.

                                I never said anything about OSU.

                                Comment

                                Working...