NCAA Football '13-Team Ratings

[blkrptnt819]

hey does anybody know who is in the top 25 for the game??

I put it in the rating prediction thread if you wanna fish it out.

[VUFTBL1]

Re: NCAA Football '13-Team Ratings

I agree, Virginia would beat Vandy. A lot of people are buying into what their asinine coach is spewing. Whoo hoo. Vandy won more than 5 games for only the 5th time in over 60 years. They still finished with a losing record and lost to a lackluster Tennessee team late in the season. Their biggest win was Wake Forrest who lost 5 of their last 6 games. C'mon, Vandy will start the season 1-6. I doubt they win 5 games. Heck, UMass might beat them.

If you think Vandy is going 1-6 out of the gate, you're crazy. Under Rodgers (the last 8 games - UGA, Army, Arkansas, Florida, Kentucky, Tennessee, Wake Forest, and Cincinnati) we averaged 30.6 points per game and 406 yards per game.. and we have EVERYBODY back on offense except Barden who had a lackluster season. We get Warren Norman (starting RB in '09 and '10) back and believe me you will know who Josh Grady and Kris Kentera are after we beat South Carolina on Aug. 30. Yes we lost Marve, Hayward, and Richardson on defense but the guys replacing them played a ton of snaps last year (Garnham, Hal, Ladler). Our defense will be better than last year.. faster more athletic. VU is going 8-4.
Now.. about the ratings.. EA is out of their freaking mind. A 77 OVR for Vandy while UK and Ole Miss are 83 OVR?!?! We beat Ole Miss 30-7 and Kentucky 38-8 last year, and the scores of those games this year are going to be very similar. There isn't one skill player on UK or Ole Miss that I would take over any skill player on VU. That is beyond rediculous!!

[boilerup23]

Re: NCAA Football '13-Team Ratings

Looks like we've got our work cut out for us. Holy schnikees.


Purdue 87 OVR- only B1G teams worse are IU, and Minnesota. Enough said.

Purdue beat Ohio State last year (again) and won 7 games without their starting quarterback. They bring back almost everyone. Purdue and Wisconsin will compete for the Leaders division.

[The Kid 24]

Re: NCAA Football '13-Team Ratings

NCAA 13 TOP PLAYERS OVERALL

Montee Ball - 98 Overall
Matt Barkley - 98 Overall
Manti Te'o - 98 Overall
Marcus Lattimore - 97 Overall
Tyler Eifert - 97 Overall
Robert Woods - 96 Overall
Star Lotulelei - 95 Overall
Kawann Short - 95 Overall
Silas Reed - 95 Overall
Landry Jones - 95 Overall
Christine Michael - 94 Overall
Ryan Swope - 94 Overall
John Boyett - 94 Overall
Kenjon Barner - 94 Overall
Sam Schwartzstein- 94 Overall
Stepfan Taylor - 93 Overall

Damn I love seeing Montee as one of the best players in the nation! Absolutely agree with that!!

But how in the hell is Wisconsin rated as the 2nd best team in the Nation! Don't agree with that at all! Hopefully the PS3 rosters guys will fix that?

[Wildcats302]

Re: NCAA Football '13-Team Ratings

If you think Vandy is going 1-6 out of the gate, you're crazy. Under Rodgers (the last 8 games - UGA, Army, Arkansas, Florida, Kentucky, Tennessee, Wake Forest, and Cincinnati) we averaged 30.6 points per game and 406 yards per game.. and we have EVERYBODY back on offense except Barden who had a lackluster season. We get Warren Norman (starting RB in '09 and '10) back and believe me you will know who Josh Grady and Kris Kentera are after we beat South Carolina on Aug. 30. Yes we lost Marve, Hayward, and Richardson on defense but the guys replacing them played a ton of snaps last year (Garnham, Hal, Ladler). Our defense will be better than last year.. faster more athletic. VU is going 8-4.
Now.. about the ratings.. EA is out of their freaking mind. A 77 OVR for Vandy while UK and Ole Miss are 83 OVR?!?! We beat Ole Miss 30-7 and Kentucky 38-8 last year, and the scores of those games this year are going to be very similar. There isn't one skill player on UK or Ole Miss that I would take over any skill player on VU. That is beyond rediculous!!

Yeah, I defended your team earlier but slow your row a bit there sport. You are not coming into Lexington and beating us anywhere close to 30 this year. We will be much improved this year...you will win IMO, but more like 10 points I'd say, which is fine, a win is a win in the SEC on the road, regardless of opponent.

[T-Moar]

Re: NCAA Football '13-Team Ratings

Yeah, we definitely need a roster fix. How in blue blazes is Rice a 2*? They've won ONE bowl game in upwards of 50 years. They haven't had more than 4 wins in a season since Chase Clement and Jarrett Dillard left. This one's making the WSU guy look justified.

[Gotmadskillzson]

Re: NCAA Football '13-Team Ratings

Another year of re-rating rosters.......

How in the world can a 175 pound person have 70 strength but a 212 pound person have 63 strength ?

But yet that 212 pound person has 92 agility ?

Defensive Ends with 78 and 80 speed ?

Too many players once again have 90 plus speed. Ratings need to follow logic and match a player's position and weight.

[troy184]

Re: NCAA Football '13-Team Ratings

So, WVU is a 4 star and Clemson is a 5 star.....70-33 makes sense to me

[blkrptnt819]

So, WVU is a 4 star and Clemson is a 5 star.....70-33 makes sense to me

They made them a 6 star this year for whatever reason.

[ActLikeYouCrow]

Re: NCAA Football '13-Team Ratings

the vandy guy has a point, other than that insane win over south carolina prediction, have we ever seen a team have two 30 point wins over conference foes one year and then be drastically rated lower than them the next. vandy does get the shaft in the ratings year to year even for their all sec caliber players who are rated like average starters just because they play for vandy.

[Noble Evildoer]

Re: NCAA Football '13-Team Ratings

The teams that are 6 stars now are completely baffling. How do Clemson, Miami (FL), and Boise get 6? What did Miami do last year to push up like that?

On the bright side, for the first time ever, Arkansas State starts off as a 2 star. So that's pretty great I guess.

[SafetyGreen]

Re: NCAA Football '13-Team Ratings

My first dynasty is going to be with UMASS BABY!!!

[GruffyMcGuiness]

Re: NCAA Football '13-Team Ratings

I guess they really hate Georgia Tech. 7 teams ahead of us? We lost 4 starters and will be in the hunt for the ACC just like every year. NC State Virginia and UNC being ahead of us REALLY throws me off. Virginia beat us last year but we have the better team.

[Td1984]

Re: NCAA Football '13-Team Ratings

-_- how can EA's staff look each other and the eye and say that this year notre dame and clemson are as good as alabama? FAR to many teams are rated in the 90's TBH

That's what I was saying earlier. I'm a fan of both the Irish and Longhorns and think both are quite overrated by EA. Both will have solid to very good defenses, but their problems are on offense (both of which were rated way too high by EA/Tiburon).

[Td1984]

Re: NCAA Football '13-Team Ratings

The teams that are 6 stars now are completely baffling. How do Clemson, Miami (FL), and Boise get 6? What did Miami do last year to push up like that?

On the bright side, for the first time ever, Arkansas State starts off as a 2 star. So that's pretty great I guess.

They'd be fun to play with this year, if I ever get the game.