2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
-
Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread
I haven't been here in a while, so first I'll say, how's everyone doing?
Second, why is anyone even making a fuss of the cheap shots going around? It's about time another team takes a few shots at Philly players. Lol, obviously I'm kidding around but it's better like that, there is finally some hatred that will make this series more exciting to watch!
As for Philly, they better pick up their game as they have been pretty weak (yes, even in the games they won) and this Habs team is pretty confident now. The small change (crashing the net) in their game plan was very effective against Leighton. Also, Laperriere back in the lineup will probably give the Flyers a ton of energy, while helping them defensively.
Oh and for the ones complaining about putting the top line at the end of the game... stop them from scoring and you won't have a problem. If the game was 11-1 I would still put my top line to score the 12th goal against Philly!
In the end, I'm a Rangers fan (converted ever since I moved to NYC) coming from a Habs background. Mike Richards is absolutely my all time favorite player in the NHL right now and I would love to see him hoist a cup in his career. Oh and the Blackhawks will win the cup this year! So basically, I'm rooting for 3 out of the 4 teams! (sorry San Jose)
Comment
-
Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread
Huge goal!Comment
-
Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread
Sharks just can't win. They should have won game one, but didn't now they have 2 PPlays and can't get a goal. And now the Hawks get a goal. This is over. Good luck Hawks fans. I like the way the Sharks played tonight, but they just can't get it done. Oh well. There is always next year.Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread
Here's your season San Jose.....
I'm predicting Toews for Chicago and Pavelski for San Jose. Yeah I know, Captain Obvious over here.Originally posted by bradtxmaleI like 6 inches. Its not too thin and not too thick. You get the support your body needs.
Comment
-
Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread
I'll say Kane for Chicago and Marleau for SJ.
Hoping it's Kane.Comment
-
Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread
What a ****ing joke.
And here I thought some of you were nuts for basically saying the refs 'are in on it'.
The jerks are giving San Jose every opportunity in the damn book to win this game. Man....I knew Bettman conversed with Stern, but I didn't think it was like that.
****!!!Comment
-
Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread
What a ****ing joke.
And here I thought some of you were nuts for basically saying the refs 'are in on it'.
The jerks are giving San Jose every opportunity in the damn book to win this game. Man....I knew Bettman conversed with Stern, but I didn't think it was like that.
****!!!Originally posted by bradtxmaleI like 6 inches. Its not too thin and not too thick. You get the support your body needs.
Comment
-
Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread
not sure what game you and friends are watching then, cause most of these penalties are self-inflicted, not conspiracy.Comment
Comment