2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BlueNGold
    Hall Of Fame
    • Aug 2009
    • 21817

    #2551
    Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

    Originally posted by Anavar
    Don't mind me. I'm drinking tonight and I'm on fire. I'm looking for a reason to get pissed. My apologies.
    Fair enough.
    Originally posted by bradtxmale
    I like 6 inches. Its not too thin and not too thick. You get the support your body needs.



    Comment

    • Evan_OS
      Go Titans..
      • Dec 2009
      • 3456

      #2552
      Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

      Despite the hawks winning, you gotta give props to the Sharks for putting up a good fight and not just laying down.

      Comment

      • Psyblast
        2023 National Champions
        • Jun 2003
        • 42584

        #2553
        Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

        Originally posted by DrJones
        The NBA analogy is lost on me. I'd love to hear a credible theory as to why the NHL would conspire against the Red Wings or Blackhawks for San Jose's benefit. That would be akin to screwing the Lakers or Celtics in favour of the Sacramento Kings.


        I'm not going to explain it because I'll be dismissed as a tinfoil hat wearing loon, but it's really not that difficult to figure out.

        Comment

        • Scottdau
          Banned
          • Feb 2003
          • 32580

          #2554
          Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

          I agree, I also think the Hawks being in the finals makes them very hungry, but they are better and have so much going for them. Any team that plays them will be in trouble, even Flyers.

          Comment

          • RealmK
            Banned
            • Sep 2003
            • 4198

            #2555
            Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

            Originally posted by ChaseB
            Sucks when you're flat wrong, too -- which you are.

            And just to clarify, I did not nor am I complaining about how the game was called, just that your view on the hit on Krejci especially is clouded.
            Fair enough Chase, though I do feel Richards tends to be a bit reckless at times. Wasn't wrong about Carcillo thou, pure classless a-hole that boy is.

            Comment

            • Anavar
              Banned
              • Feb 2010
              • 209

              #2556
              Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

              Originally posted by DrJones
              The NBA analogy is lost on me. I'd love to hear a credible theory as to why the NHL would conspire against the Red Wings or Blackhawks for San Jose's benefit. That would be akin to screwing the Lakers or Celtics in favour of the Sacramento Kings.

              I'll explain it. The more the series drags out, the more revenue to be made.<---Stern's bread and butter.

              It's not necessarily against either/or. I stand by my opinion tonight, but obviously it is a touchy subject, so I'll leave it alone.

              I agree that San Jose played excellent tonight; it's honestly that our defense is playing better and Niemi is stepping up his game.

              With all that said, I would not count out the Sharks. As much as Scott says this is over, it's not. San Jose has too much fire power and too much pride to just lay down and die right now.

              See you guys for Game 4. Good luck Scott.

              Comment

              • Piderman
                Banned
                • Apr 2009
                • 1953

                #2557
                Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

                What happened on the last goal? I think everyone lost track of what the hell happened and Dustin put in the net. Maybe it was one of those "right place, right time goals", well to me at least.

                Comment

                • tyler289
                  MVP
                  • Jul 2006
                  • 2933

                  #2558
                  Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

                  Hawks probably won the Cup tonight.

                  Comment

                  • Scottdau
                    Banned
                    • Feb 2003
                    • 32580

                    #2559
                    Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

                    Originally posted by Piderman
                    What happened on the last goal? I think everyone lost track of what the hell happened and Dustin put in the net. Maybe it was one of those "right place, right time goals", well to me at least.
                    Pretty much it happens. And it is over. The only way the come back is if the Joe's line go off big time it is possible, but it will take a lot. They are losing games the way they won this playoffs. Which is not good. Still the Hawks are playing better and it is showing. Still either game could have gone either way. So it is what it is. And for record the penalties were called right, except the first of the game that was not interferences.

                    Comment

                    • pietasterp
                      All Star
                      • Feb 2004
                      • 6246

                      #2560
                      Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

                      Ooph...tough break for the Sharks. Confusion leading to the goal by the 'Hawks. SJ needed it tonight to get back in the series, but notwithstanding what the Habs just did, there's really no coming back from 0-3.

                      Having said that, it ain't over 'til it's over, and all SJ can do is win one game at a time. The Blackhawks look unbeatable right now, though...

                      Comment

                      • RealmK
                        Banned
                        • Sep 2003
                        • 4198

                        #2561
                        Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

                        That puck came back out front quickly Nadivekov had no chance to even set up.

                        Comment

                        • Scottdau
                          Banned
                          • Feb 2003
                          • 32580

                          #2562
                          Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

                          Yep, it is just one of those plays, it sucks that it happen in game 3 OT, but what can you do. I will say this the Hawks won so the Sharks can too, but the way the games have ended I don't happening. Game 1 and Game 3 were really some fun games to watch!

                          Comment

                          • DrJones
                            All Star
                            • Mar 2003
                            • 9113

                            #2563
                            Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

                            Originally posted by Anavar
                            I'll explain it. The more the series drags out, the more revenue to be made.<---Stern's bread and butter.

                            It's not necessarily against either/or. I stand by my opinion tonight, but obviously it is a touchy subject, so I'll leave it alone.
                            If this was true, why didn't the Red Wings receive a ton of PP in Game 5? How would it benefit Bettman & co. to have its biggest US TV draw go out in a short series? If you've seen the TV ratings so far, Conference Finals ratings are down about 25% from DET/CHI and PIT/CAR last year.

                            And Stern must be losing his touch. There have been four sweeps in this year's NBA playoffs, with an excellent chance of both Conference Finals ending in 4 straight as well.
                            Originally posted by Thrash13
                            Dr. Jones was right in stating that. We should have believed him.
                            Originally posted by slickdtc
                            DrJones brings the stinky cheese is what we've all learned from this debacle.
                            Originally posted by Kipnis22
                            yes your fantasy world when your proven wrong about 95% of your post

                            Comment

                            • DrJones
                              All Star
                              • Mar 2003
                              • 9113

                              #2564
                              Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

                              Originally posted by Psyblast
                              I'm not going to explain it because I'll be dismissed as a tinfoil hat wearing loon, but it's really not that difficult to figure out.
                              PM me, then. I'm curious.
                              Originally posted by Thrash13
                              Dr. Jones was right in stating that. We should have believed him.
                              Originally posted by slickdtc
                              DrJones brings the stinky cheese is what we've all learned from this debacle.
                              Originally posted by Kipnis22
                              yes your fantasy world when your proven wrong about 95% of your post

                              Comment

                              • Tydis
                                Rookie
                                • Feb 2009
                                • 388

                                #2565
                                Re: 2010 Stanley Cup Playoffs Thread

                                Outside of a few Stars games I don't follow hockey a whole hell of a lot, but tonight's game was simply amazing to watch.

                                Comment

                                Working...